Lin Guo, Li Xia, Qiuting Zheng, Bin Zheng, Stefan Jaeger, Maryellen L Giger, Jordan Fuhrman, Hui Li, Fleming Y M Lure, Hongjun Li, Li Li
{"title":"人工智能能否生成诊断报告,供放射医师审批 CXR 图像?多阅读器和多病例观察者性能研究。","authors":"Lin Guo, Li Xia, Qiuting Zheng, Bin Zheng, Stefan Jaeger, Maryellen L Giger, Jordan Fuhrman, Hui Li, Fleming Y M Lure, Hongjun Li, Li Li","doi":"10.3233/XST-240051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurately detecting a variety of lung abnormalities from heterogenous chest X-ray (CXR) images and writing radiology reports is often difficult and time-consuming.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To access the utility of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) system (MOM-ClaSeg) in enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of radiologists in detecting heterogenous lung abnormalities through a multi-reader and multi-case (MRMC) observer performance study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over 36,000 CXR images were retrospectively collected from 12 hospitals over 4 months and used as the experiment group and the control group. In the control group, a double reading method is used in which two radiologists interpret CXR to generate a final report, while in the experiment group, one radiologist generates the final reports based on AI-generated reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with double reading, the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of single reading with AI increases significantly by 1.49% and 10.95%, respectively (P < 0.001), while the difference in specificity is small (0.22%) and without statistical significance (P = 0.255). Additionally, the average image reading and diagnostic time in the experimental group is reduced by 54.70% (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This MRMC study demonstrates that MOM-ClaSeg can potentially serve as the first reader to generate the initial diagnostic reports, with a radiologist only reviewing and making minor modifications (if needed) to arrive at the final decision. It also shows that single reading with AI can achieve a higher diagnostic accuracy and efficiency than double reading.</p>","PeriodicalId":49948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can AI generate diagnostic reports for radiologist approval on CXR images? A multi-reader and multi-case observer performance study.\",\"authors\":\"Lin Guo, Li Xia, Qiuting Zheng, Bin Zheng, Stefan Jaeger, Maryellen L Giger, Jordan Fuhrman, Hui Li, Fleming Y M Lure, Hongjun Li, Li Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/XST-240051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurately detecting a variety of lung abnormalities from heterogenous chest X-ray (CXR) images and writing radiology reports is often difficult and time-consuming.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To access the utility of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) system (MOM-ClaSeg) in enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of radiologists in detecting heterogenous lung abnormalities through a multi-reader and multi-case (MRMC) observer performance study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over 36,000 CXR images were retrospectively collected from 12 hospitals over 4 months and used as the experiment group and the control group. In the control group, a double reading method is used in which two radiologists interpret CXR to generate a final report, while in the experiment group, one radiologist generates the final reports based on AI-generated reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with double reading, the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of single reading with AI increases significantly by 1.49% and 10.95%, respectively (P < 0.001), while the difference in specificity is small (0.22%) and without statistical significance (P = 0.255). Additionally, the average image reading and diagnostic time in the experimental group is reduced by 54.70% (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This MRMC study demonstrates that MOM-ClaSeg can potentially serve as the first reader to generate the initial diagnostic reports, with a radiologist only reviewing and making minor modifications (if needed) to arrive at the final decision. It also shows that single reading with AI can achieve a higher diagnostic accuracy and efficiency than double reading.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/XST-240051\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/XST-240051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can AI generate diagnostic reports for radiologist approval on CXR images? A multi-reader and multi-case observer performance study.
Background: Accurately detecting a variety of lung abnormalities from heterogenous chest X-ray (CXR) images and writing radiology reports is often difficult and time-consuming.
Objective: To access the utility of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) system (MOM-ClaSeg) in enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of radiologists in detecting heterogenous lung abnormalities through a multi-reader and multi-case (MRMC) observer performance study.
Methods: Over 36,000 CXR images were retrospectively collected from 12 hospitals over 4 months and used as the experiment group and the control group. In the control group, a double reading method is used in which two radiologists interpret CXR to generate a final report, while in the experiment group, one radiologist generates the final reports based on AI-generated reports.
Results: Compared with double reading, the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of single reading with AI increases significantly by 1.49% and 10.95%, respectively (P < 0.001), while the difference in specificity is small (0.22%) and without statistical significance (P = 0.255). Additionally, the average image reading and diagnostic time in the experimental group is reduced by 54.70% (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: This MRMC study demonstrates that MOM-ClaSeg can potentially serve as the first reader to generate the initial diagnostic reports, with a radiologist only reviewing and making minor modifications (if needed) to arrive at the final decision. It also shows that single reading with AI can achieve a higher diagnostic accuracy and efficiency than double reading.
期刊介绍:
Research areas within the scope of the journal include:
Interaction of x-rays with matter: x-ray phenomena, biological effects of radiation, radiation safety and optical constants
X-ray sources: x-rays from synchrotrons, x-ray lasers, plasmas, and other sources, conventional or unconventional
Optical elements: grazing incidence optics, multilayer mirrors, zone plates, gratings, other diffraction optics
Optical instruments: interferometers, spectrometers, microscopes, telescopes, microprobes