Josef S Smolen, Jakub Trefler, Artur Racewicz, Janusz Jaworski, Agnieszka Zielińska, Marek Krogulec, Sławomir Jeka, Rafał Wojciechowski, Katarzyna Kolossa, Anna Dudek, Magdalena Krajewska-Włodarczyk, Paweł Hrycaj, Piotr Adrian Klimiuk, Gerd R Burmester, SungHyun Kim, YunJu Bae, GoEun Yang, YooBin Jung, JiWoo Hong, Edward Keystone
{"title":"CT-P47与参考药物托西珠单抗的疗效和安全性对比:一项针对类风湿关节炎患者的随机、主动对照、双盲、III期研究的32周结果,包括从参考药物托珠单抗到CT-P47的8周转换数据。","authors":"Josef S Smolen, Jakub Trefler, Artur Racewicz, Janusz Jaworski, Agnieszka Zielińska, Marek Krogulec, Sławomir Jeka, Rafał Wojciechowski, Katarzyna Kolossa, Anna Dudek, Magdalena Krajewska-Włodarczyk, Paweł Hrycaj, Piotr Adrian Klimiuk, Gerd R Burmester, SungHyun Kim, YunJu Bae, GoEun Yang, YooBin Jung, JiWoo Hong, Edward Keystone","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To demonstrate efficacy equivalence of CT-P47 and EU-approved reference tocilizumab (r-TCZ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind, phase III study randomised (1:1) patients to receive CT-P47 or r-TCZ (8 mg/kg) every 4 weeks until week 20 during treatment period (TP) 1. Prior to week 24 dosing, patients receiving r-TCZ were randomised (1:1) to continue r-TCZ or switch to CT-P47; patients receiving CT-P47 continued CT-P47 (TP2, 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks until week 48). The dual primary endpoints (for different regulatory requirements) were mean changes from baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28; erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) at week 12 and week 24. Efficacy equivalence was determined if CIs for the treatment difference were within predefined equivalence margins: (95% CI -0.6, 0.6 (analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)) at week 12 or 90% CI -0.6, 0.5 (ANCOVA with multiple imputation) at week 24). Additional efficacy, pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety endpoints, including immunogenicity, were investigated. Findings up to week 32 are presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In TP1, 471 patients were randomised (234 CT-P47; 237 r-TCZ). The 95% and 90% CIs for the estimated treatment differences were contained within the predefined equivalence margins; the estimated difference in DAS28-ESR at week 12 was -0.01 (95% CI -0.26, 0.24) and at week 24 was -0.10 (90% CI -0.30, 0.10). Secondary efficacy endpoints, PKs and overall safety were comparable between groups up to week 32.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efficacy equivalence, alongside comparable PK, safety and immunogenicity profiles, was determined between CT-P47 and r-TCZ in adults with RA, including after switching from r-TCZ to CT-P47.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of CT-P47 versus reference tocilizumab: 32-week results of a randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, phase III study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, including 8 weeks of switching data from reference tocilizumab to CT-P47.\",\"authors\":\"Josef S Smolen, Jakub Trefler, Artur Racewicz, Janusz Jaworski, Agnieszka Zielińska, Marek Krogulec, Sławomir Jeka, Rafał Wojciechowski, Katarzyna Kolossa, Anna Dudek, Magdalena Krajewska-Włodarczyk, Paweł Hrycaj, Piotr Adrian Klimiuk, Gerd R Burmester, SungHyun Kim, YunJu Bae, GoEun Yang, YooBin Jung, JiWoo Hong, Edward Keystone\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To demonstrate efficacy equivalence of CT-P47 and EU-approved reference tocilizumab (r-TCZ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind, phase III study randomised (1:1) patients to receive CT-P47 or r-TCZ (8 mg/kg) every 4 weeks until week 20 during treatment period (TP) 1. Prior to week 24 dosing, patients receiving r-TCZ were randomised (1:1) to continue r-TCZ or switch to CT-P47; patients receiving CT-P47 continued CT-P47 (TP2, 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks until week 48). The dual primary endpoints (for different regulatory requirements) were mean changes from baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28; erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) at week 12 and week 24. Efficacy equivalence was determined if CIs for the treatment difference were within predefined equivalence margins: (95% CI -0.6, 0.6 (analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)) at week 12 or 90% CI -0.6, 0.5 (ANCOVA with multiple imputation) at week 24). Additional efficacy, pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety endpoints, including immunogenicity, were investigated. Findings up to week 32 are presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In TP1, 471 patients were randomised (234 CT-P47; 237 r-TCZ). The 95% and 90% CIs for the estimated treatment differences were contained within the predefined equivalence margins; the estimated difference in DAS28-ESR at week 12 was -0.01 (95% CI -0.26, 0.24) and at week 24 was -0.10 (90% CI -0.30, 0.10). Secondary efficacy endpoints, PKs and overall safety were comparable between groups up to week 32.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efficacy equivalence, alongside comparable PK, safety and immunogenicity profiles, was determined between CT-P47 and r-TCZ in adults with RA, including after switching from r-TCZ to CT-P47.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RMD Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492937/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RMD Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004514\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004514","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:证明CT-P47与欧盟批准的参考药物托昔单抗(r-TCZ)在类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者中的疗效相当:证明CT-P47和欧盟批准的托珠单抗(r-TCZ)在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中的疗效等同性:这项双盲III期研究随机(1:1)分配患者接受CT-P47或r-TCZ(8 mg/kg)治疗,每4周一次,直至治疗期(TP)1的第20周。在第24周用药前,接受r-TCZ治疗的患者被随机(1:1)分配到继续接受r-TCZ或改用CT-P47治疗;接受CT-P47治疗的患者继续接受CT-P47治疗(TP2,每4周一次,每次8毫克/千克,直到第48周)。双重主要终点(针对不同的监管要求)是第12周和第24周28个关节疾病活动评分(DAS28;红细胞沉降率(ESR))与基线相比的平均变化。如果治疗差异的 CI 值在预定义的等效范围内,则确定疗效等效:(第 12 周时,95% CI -0.6,0.6(协方差分析 (ANCOVA));第 24 周时,90% CI -0.6,0.5(多重归因 ANCOVA))。此外,还研究了其他疗效、药代动力学 (PK) 和安全性终点,包括免疫原性。结果:在 TP1 中,471 名患者接受了随机治疗(234 名 CT-P47;237 名 r-TCZ)。估计治疗差异的 95% 和 90% CI 均在预定的等效范围内;第 12 周 DAS28-ESR 的估计差异为-0.01(95% CI -0.26,0.24),第 24 周为-0.10(90% CI -0.30,0.10)。截至第 32 周,各组间的次要疗效终点、PK 和总体安全性相当:CT-P47和r-TCZ在成人RA患者中的疗效相当,同时PK、安全性和免疫原性也相当,包括从r-TCZ转为CT-P47之后。
Efficacy and safety of CT-P47 versus reference tocilizumab: 32-week results of a randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, phase III study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, including 8 weeks of switching data from reference tocilizumab to CT-P47.
Objectives: To demonstrate efficacy equivalence of CT-P47 and EU-approved reference tocilizumab (r-TCZ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Methods: This double-blind, phase III study randomised (1:1) patients to receive CT-P47 or r-TCZ (8 mg/kg) every 4 weeks until week 20 during treatment period (TP) 1. Prior to week 24 dosing, patients receiving r-TCZ were randomised (1:1) to continue r-TCZ or switch to CT-P47; patients receiving CT-P47 continued CT-P47 (TP2, 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks until week 48). The dual primary endpoints (for different regulatory requirements) were mean changes from baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28; erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) at week 12 and week 24. Efficacy equivalence was determined if CIs for the treatment difference were within predefined equivalence margins: (95% CI -0.6, 0.6 (analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)) at week 12 or 90% CI -0.6, 0.5 (ANCOVA with multiple imputation) at week 24). Additional efficacy, pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety endpoints, including immunogenicity, were investigated. Findings up to week 32 are presented.
Results: In TP1, 471 patients were randomised (234 CT-P47; 237 r-TCZ). The 95% and 90% CIs for the estimated treatment differences were contained within the predefined equivalence margins; the estimated difference in DAS28-ESR at week 12 was -0.01 (95% CI -0.26, 0.24) and at week 24 was -0.10 (90% CI -0.30, 0.10). Secondary efficacy endpoints, PKs and overall safety were comparable between groups up to week 32.
Conclusions: Efficacy equivalence, alongside comparable PK, safety and immunogenicity profiles, was determined between CT-P47 and r-TCZ in adults with RA, including after switching from r-TCZ to CT-P47.
期刊介绍:
RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.