{"title":"抑制控制共性的特异性:利用荟萃分析和回归分析确定精神障碍的关键脑区。","authors":"Li Wan, Pingting Pei, Qinghui Zhang, Wenxiang Gao","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The differential diagnosis of psychiatric disorders is relatively challenging for several reasons. In this context, we believe that task-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can serve as a tool for differential diagnosis. The aim of this study was to explore the commonalities in brain activities among individuals with psychiatric disorders and to identify the key brain regions that can distinguish between these disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar databases were searched for whole-brain functional MRI studies that compared psychiatric patients and normal controls. The psychiatric disorders included schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BD), major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive-compulsive disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Studies using go-nogo paradigms were selected, we then conducted activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis, factor analysis, and regression analysis on these studies subsequently.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 152 studies (108 with patients) were selected and a consistent pattern was found, that is, decreased activities in the same brain regions across six disorders. Factor analysis clustered six disorders into three pairs: SCZ and ASD, MDD and BD, and ADHD and BD. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of SCZ and ASD was located in the left and right thalamus; and the heterogeneity of MDD and BD was located in the thalamus, insula, and superior frontal gyrus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results can lead to a new classification method for psychiatric disorders, benefit the differential diagnosis at an early stage, and help to understand the biobasis of psychiatric disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":"67 1","pages":"e69"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Specificity in the commonalities of inhibition control: using meta-analysis and regression analysis to identify the key brain regions in psychiatric disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Li Wan, Pingting Pei, Qinghui Zhang, Wenxiang Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The differential diagnosis of psychiatric disorders is relatively challenging for several reasons. In this context, we believe that task-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can serve as a tool for differential diagnosis. The aim of this study was to explore the commonalities in brain activities among individuals with psychiatric disorders and to identify the key brain regions that can distinguish between these disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar databases were searched for whole-brain functional MRI studies that compared psychiatric patients and normal controls. The psychiatric disorders included schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BD), major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive-compulsive disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Studies using go-nogo paradigms were selected, we then conducted activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis, factor analysis, and regression analysis on these studies subsequently.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 152 studies (108 with patients) were selected and a consistent pattern was found, that is, decreased activities in the same brain regions across six disorders. Factor analysis clustered six disorders into three pairs: SCZ and ASD, MDD and BD, and ADHD and BD. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of SCZ and ASD was located in the left and right thalamus; and the heterogeneity of MDD and BD was located in the thalamus, insula, and superior frontal gyrus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results can lead to a new classification method for psychiatric disorders, benefit the differential diagnosis at an early stage, and help to understand the biobasis of psychiatric disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"e69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1785\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1785","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:由于多种原因,精神疾病的鉴别诊断相对具有挑战性。在这种情况下,我们认为基于任务的磁共振成像(MRI)可作为鉴别诊断的工具。本研究旨在探索精神疾病患者大脑活动的共性,并确定能够区分这些疾病的关键脑区:方法:我们在 PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science、Scopus、PsycINFO 和 Google Scholar 数据库中搜索了对比精神病患者和正常对照组的全脑功能磁共振成像研究。精神疾病包括精神分裂症 (SCZ)、双相情感障碍 (BD)、重度抑郁障碍 (MDD)、强迫症、注意力缺陷/多动障碍 (ADHD) 和自闭症谱系障碍 (ASD)。我们选择了使用go-nogo范式的研究,随后对这些研究进行了激活似然估计(ALE)荟萃分析、因素分析和回归分析:结果:共选取了 152 项研究(其中 108 项涉及患者),发现了一种一致的模式,即六种疾病的相同脑区活动减少。因子分析将六种疾病分为三对:SCZ和ASD、MDD和BD以及ADHD和BD。此外,SCZ和ASD的异质性位于左侧和右侧丘脑;MDD和BD的异质性位于丘脑、脑岛和额上回:结论:研究结果可为精神疾病的分类提供一种新方法,有利于早期鉴别诊断,并有助于了解精神疾病的生物基础。
Specificity in the commonalities of inhibition control: using meta-analysis and regression analysis to identify the key brain regions in psychiatric disorders.
Background: The differential diagnosis of psychiatric disorders is relatively challenging for several reasons. In this context, we believe that task-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can serve as a tool for differential diagnosis. The aim of this study was to explore the commonalities in brain activities among individuals with psychiatric disorders and to identify the key brain regions that can distinguish between these disorders.
Methods: The PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar databases were searched for whole-brain functional MRI studies that compared psychiatric patients and normal controls. The psychiatric disorders included schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BD), major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive-compulsive disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Studies using go-nogo paradigms were selected, we then conducted activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis, factor analysis, and regression analysis on these studies subsequently.
Results: A total of 152 studies (108 with patients) were selected and a consistent pattern was found, that is, decreased activities in the same brain regions across six disorders. Factor analysis clustered six disorders into three pairs: SCZ and ASD, MDD and BD, and ADHD and BD. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of SCZ and ASD was located in the left and right thalamus; and the heterogeneity of MDD and BD was located in the thalamus, insula, and superior frontal gyrus.
Conclusion: The results can lead to a new classification method for psychiatric disorders, benefit the differential diagnosis at an early stage, and help to understand the biobasis of psychiatric disorders.
期刊介绍:
European Psychiatry, the official journal of the European Psychiatric Association, is dedicated to sharing cutting-edge research, policy updates, and fostering dialogue among clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates in the fields of psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and neuroscience. This peer-reviewed, Open Access journal strives to publish the latest advancements across various mental health issues, including diagnostic and treatment breakthroughs, as well as advancements in understanding the biological foundations of mental, behavioral, and cognitive functions in both clinical and general population studies.