养育方式与后代使用药物的关系--系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Martin Pinquart, Jana Lauk
{"title":"养育方式与后代使用药物的关系--系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Martin Pinquart, Jana Lauk","doi":"10.1111/dar.13961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Issues: </strong>Parenting styles have been suggested to predict the use of psychoactive substances in the offspring, although the size of associations might vary between cultures. The present meta-analysis tested whether parenting styles show concurrent and longitudinal associations with substance use and whether this association is moderated by study characteristics.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>A systematic search in electronic data bases resulted in 184 studies that were included in multi-level meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>An authoritative parenting style correlated with lower substance use (r =-0.12, confidence interval [CI] -0.14 to -0.10) while the reverse was found for neglectful (r = 0.10, CI 0.08 to 0.13), permissive (r = 0.04, CI 0.01 to 0.07) and authoritarian parenting (r = 0.03, CI 0.00 to 0.05). Analysis of cross-lagged effects found only an effect of authoritative parenting on decline of substance use (r = -0.06, CI -0.12 to -0.00). The size of associations varied, in part, by levels of horizontal and vertical collectivism or individualism, assessment of three versus four parenting styles, type of substance, and use of same versus different informants for assessing parenting and substance use.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Parenting styles show small to very small associations with substance use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although parents are recommended to behave in an authoritative manner, we should have only modest expectations about the effects of parenting styles on substance use in the offspring.</p>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations of parenting styles with substance use in the offspring-A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Pinquart, Jana Lauk\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dar.13961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Issues: </strong>Parenting styles have been suggested to predict the use of psychoactive substances in the offspring, although the size of associations might vary between cultures. The present meta-analysis tested whether parenting styles show concurrent and longitudinal associations with substance use and whether this association is moderated by study characteristics.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>A systematic search in electronic data bases resulted in 184 studies that were included in multi-level meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>An authoritative parenting style correlated with lower substance use (r =-0.12, confidence interval [CI] -0.14 to -0.10) while the reverse was found for neglectful (r = 0.10, CI 0.08 to 0.13), permissive (r = 0.04, CI 0.01 to 0.07) and authoritarian parenting (r = 0.03, CI 0.00 to 0.05). Analysis of cross-lagged effects found only an effect of authoritative parenting on decline of substance use (r = -0.06, CI -0.12 to -0.00). The size of associations varied, in part, by levels of horizontal and vertical collectivism or individualism, assessment of three versus four parenting styles, type of substance, and use of same versus different informants for assessing parenting and substance use.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Parenting styles show small to very small associations with substance use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although parents are recommended to behave in an authoritative manner, we should have only modest expectations about the effects of parenting styles on substance use in the offspring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13961\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13961","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题:有人认为,养育方式可预测后代使用精神活性物质的情况,尽管不同文化之间的关联程度可能有所不同。本荟萃分析检验了养育方式是否与药物使用存在并发和纵向关联,以及这种关联是否受研究特征的调节:方法:在电子数据库中进行了系统搜索,结果有 184 项研究被纳入多层次荟萃分析:权威型养育方式与较低的药物使用率相关(r =-0.12,置信区间 [CI] -0.14至-0.10),而忽视型(r = 0.10,CI 0.08至0.13)、放任型(r = 0.04,CI 0.01至0.07)和专制型(r = 0.03,CI 0.00至0.05)则相反。对交叉滞后效应的分析发现,只有权威型养育方式对药物使用下降有影响(r = -0.06,CI -0.12至-0.00)。相关性的大小部分取决于横向和纵向集体主义或个人主义的水平、三种或四种养育方式的评估、物质类型以及使用相同或不同的信息提供者来评估养育方式和物质使用情况:影响:养育方式与药物使用的关系很小:结论:尽管建议父母以权威的方式行事,但我们对养育方式对后代药物使用的影响只能抱有适度的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations of parenting styles with substance use in the offspring-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Issues: Parenting styles have been suggested to predict the use of psychoactive substances in the offspring, although the size of associations might vary between cultures. The present meta-analysis tested whether parenting styles show concurrent and longitudinal associations with substance use and whether this association is moderated by study characteristics.

Approach: A systematic search in electronic data bases resulted in 184 studies that were included in multi-level meta-analysis.

Key findings: An authoritative parenting style correlated with lower substance use (r =-0.12, confidence interval [CI] -0.14 to -0.10) while the reverse was found for neglectful (r = 0.10, CI 0.08 to 0.13), permissive (r = 0.04, CI 0.01 to 0.07) and authoritarian parenting (r = 0.03, CI 0.00 to 0.05). Analysis of cross-lagged effects found only an effect of authoritative parenting on decline of substance use (r = -0.06, CI -0.12 to -0.00). The size of associations varied, in part, by levels of horizontal and vertical collectivism or individualism, assessment of three versus four parenting styles, type of substance, and use of same versus different informants for assessing parenting and substance use.

Implications: Parenting styles show small to very small associations with substance use.

Conclusions: Although parents are recommended to behave in an authoritative manner, we should have only modest expectations about the effects of parenting styles on substance use in the offspring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信