丛集性头痛诊断中的神经和系统性误区:基于病例的回顾。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ansu Sen, Angshuman Mukherjee, Ambar Chakravarty
{"title":"丛集性头痛诊断中的神经和系统性误区:基于病例的回顾。","authors":"Ansu Sen, Angshuman Mukherjee, Ambar Chakravarty","doi":"10.1007/s11910-024-01381-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To describe different pitfalls in the diagnosis of primary cluster headaches (CHs) with the guidance of seven case vignettes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The question of whether primary CHs and migraines are totally different entities has been long debated. Autonomic features can be detected in as many as 60% of migraine patients. Although some genetic similarities have been found, CACNA1A mutations have not been detected among CH patients with hemimotor aura in contrast to hemiplegic migraine. Recently, functional MRI studies have shown that the left thalamic network was the most discriminative MRI feature in distinguishing migraine from CH patients. Compared to migraine, CH patients showed decreased functional interaction between the left thalamus and cortical areas mediating interception and sensory integration. However, clinically the most significant feature had been the restlessness and agitation seen during headache attacks patients with CHs. This feature is also important in distinguishing cluster patients from other patients having other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias except for a subset of patients with hemicrania continua. CH is an important member of the group of headache disorders characterized by their association with one or more autonomic features in the trigeminal nerve distribution and termed Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias (TACs). Although CH is a relatively rare condition, judged by the distress it generally causes to the affected individual, early diagnosis and institution of appropriate therapy seem mandatory. Correct diagnosis of CHs needs avoidance of pitfalls. Such pitfalls generally include differentiation from migraine, differentiation from other side locked headache disorders, from other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs), and lastly, recognition of rare presentations of cluster-like manifestations with hemiplegic aura and simulating trigeminal and glossopharyngeal neuralgias. Differentiation between primary and symptomatic CHs related to sellar pathologies and systemic medical conditions is of equal importance. In the present review such issues are discussed with the assistance of seven case vignettes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10831,"journal":{"name":"Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports","volume":" ","pages":"581-592"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurological and Systemic Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Cluster Headaches: A Case-Based Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ansu Sen, Angshuman Mukherjee, Ambar Chakravarty\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11910-024-01381-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To describe different pitfalls in the diagnosis of primary cluster headaches (CHs) with the guidance of seven case vignettes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The question of whether primary CHs and migraines are totally different entities has been long debated. Autonomic features can be detected in as many as 60% of migraine patients. Although some genetic similarities have been found, CACNA1A mutations have not been detected among CH patients with hemimotor aura in contrast to hemiplegic migraine. Recently, functional MRI studies have shown that the left thalamic network was the most discriminative MRI feature in distinguishing migraine from CH patients. Compared to migraine, CH patients showed decreased functional interaction between the left thalamus and cortical areas mediating interception and sensory integration. However, clinically the most significant feature had been the restlessness and agitation seen during headache attacks patients with CHs. This feature is also important in distinguishing cluster patients from other patients having other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias except for a subset of patients with hemicrania continua. CH is an important member of the group of headache disorders characterized by their association with one or more autonomic features in the trigeminal nerve distribution and termed Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias (TACs). Although CH is a relatively rare condition, judged by the distress it generally causes to the affected individual, early diagnosis and institution of appropriate therapy seem mandatory. Correct diagnosis of CHs needs avoidance of pitfalls. Such pitfalls generally include differentiation from migraine, differentiation from other side locked headache disorders, from other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs), and lastly, recognition of rare presentations of cluster-like manifestations with hemiplegic aura and simulating trigeminal and glossopharyngeal neuralgias. Differentiation between primary and symptomatic CHs related to sellar pathologies and systemic medical conditions is of equal importance. In the present review such issues are discussed with the assistance of seven case vignettes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"581-592\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-024-01381-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-024-01381-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述的目的:以七个病例为指导,描述原发性丛集性头痛(CHs)诊断中的不同误区:原发性丛集性头痛和偏头痛是否是完全不同的实体这一问题争论已久。多达 60% 的偏头痛患者可检测到自主神经特征。虽然发现了一些遗传相似性,但与偏瘫性偏头痛相比,在有偏运动先兆的CH患者中并未发现CACNA1A突变。最近,功能磁共振成像研究表明,左丘脑网络是区分偏头痛和CH患者的最具鉴别力的磁共振成像特征。与偏头痛相比,CH 患者的左丘脑与介导截取和感觉整合的皮质区域之间的功能交互作用减弱。然而,在临床上,CHs 患者在头痛发作时最显著的特征是烦躁不安。这一特征也是区分丛集性头痛患者与其他三叉神经自律性头痛患者的重要依据,但部分持续性头痛患者除外。头痛性颅内压增高症是头痛疾病中的一个重要成员,其特征是与三叉神经分布的一种或多种自主神经特征有关,被称为三叉神经自主神经性头痛(TACs)。虽然三叉神经自律性头痛是一种相对罕见的疾病,但从它通常给患者造成的痛苦来看,早期诊断和采取适当的治疗似乎是必须的。正确诊断头痛需要避免误区。这些误区一般包括与偏头痛的鉴别、与其他侧锁性头痛疾病的鉴别、与其他三叉神经自律性头痛(TAC)的鉴别,最后是识别罕见的伴有偏瘫先兆的群集样表现以及模拟三叉神经痛和舌咽神经痛的表现。区分与蝶窦病变和全身性疾病相关的原发性 CH 和症状性 CH 同样重要。在本综述中,将通过七个病例讨论这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neurological and Systemic Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Cluster Headaches: A Case-Based Review.

Purpose of review: To describe different pitfalls in the diagnosis of primary cluster headaches (CHs) with the guidance of seven case vignettes.

Recent findings: The question of whether primary CHs and migraines are totally different entities has been long debated. Autonomic features can be detected in as many as 60% of migraine patients. Although some genetic similarities have been found, CACNA1A mutations have not been detected among CH patients with hemimotor aura in contrast to hemiplegic migraine. Recently, functional MRI studies have shown that the left thalamic network was the most discriminative MRI feature in distinguishing migraine from CH patients. Compared to migraine, CH patients showed decreased functional interaction between the left thalamus and cortical areas mediating interception and sensory integration. However, clinically the most significant feature had been the restlessness and agitation seen during headache attacks patients with CHs. This feature is also important in distinguishing cluster patients from other patients having other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias except for a subset of patients with hemicrania continua. CH is an important member of the group of headache disorders characterized by their association with one or more autonomic features in the trigeminal nerve distribution and termed Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias (TACs). Although CH is a relatively rare condition, judged by the distress it generally causes to the affected individual, early diagnosis and institution of appropriate therapy seem mandatory. Correct diagnosis of CHs needs avoidance of pitfalls. Such pitfalls generally include differentiation from migraine, differentiation from other side locked headache disorders, from other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs), and lastly, recognition of rare presentations of cluster-like manifestations with hemiplegic aura and simulating trigeminal and glossopharyngeal neuralgias. Differentiation between primary and symptomatic CHs related to sellar pathologies and systemic medical conditions is of equal importance. In the present review such issues are discussed with the assistance of seven case vignettes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports provides in-depth review articles contributed by international experts on the most significant developments in the field. By presenting clear, insightful, balanced reviews that emphasize recently published papers of major importance, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of neurological disease and disorders. Presents the views of experts on current advances in neurology and neuroscience Gathers and synthesizes important recent papers on the topic Includes reviews of recently published clinical trials, valuable web sites, and commentaries from well-known figures in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信