多组学揭示了阿尔茨海默病整个病程中将宏观结构协方差网络功能障碍与神经精神症状联系起来的生物机制。

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Jiwei Jiang, Kun Zhao, Wenyi Li, Peiyang Zheng, Shirui Jiang, Qiwei Ren, Yunyun Duan, Huiying Yu, Xiaopeng Kang, Junjie Li, Ke Hu, Tianlin Jiang, Min Zhao, Linlin Wang, Shiyi Yang, Huiying Zhang, Yaou Liu, Anxin Wang, Yong Liu, Jun Xu
{"title":"多组学揭示了阿尔茨海默病整个病程中将宏观结构协方差网络功能障碍与神经精神症状联系起来的生物机制。","authors":"Jiwei Jiang, Kun Zhao, Wenyi Li, Peiyang Zheng, Shirui Jiang, Qiwei Ren, Yunyun Duan, Huiying Yu, Xiaopeng Kang, Junjie Li, Ke Hu, Tianlin Jiang, Min Zhao, Linlin Wang, Shiyi Yang, Huiying Zhang, Yaou Liu, Anxin Wang, Yong Liu, Jun Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.08.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The highly heterogeneity of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs) hinder further exploration of their role in neurobiological mechanisms and Alzheimer's disease (AD). We aimed to delineate NPS patterns based on brain macroscale connectomics to understand the biological mechanisms of NPSs on the AD continuum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We constructed Regional Radiomics Similarity Networks (R2SN) for 550 participants (AD with NPSs [AD-NPS, n=376], AD without NPSs [AD-nNPS, n=111], and normal controls [n=63]) from CIBL study. We identified R2SN connections associated with NPSs, and then cluster distinct subtypes of AD-NPS. An independent dataset (n=189) and internal validation were performed to assess the robustness of the NPS subtypes. Subsequent multiomics analysis were performed to assess the distinct clinical phenotype and biological mechanisms in each NPS subtype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AD-NPS patients were clustered into severe (n=187), moderate (n=87), and mild NPS (n=102) subtypes, each exhibiting distinct brain network dysfunction patterns. A high level of consistency in clustering NPS was internally and externally validated. Severe and moderate NPSs showed significant cognitive impairment, increased plasma p-Tau<sub>181</sub> levels, extensive decreased brain volume and cortical thickness, and accelerated cognitive decline. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed enrichment of differentially expressed genes in ion transport and synaptic transmission with variations for each NPS subtype. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) analysis defined the specific gene loci for each subtype of AD-NPS (i.e, logical memory), aligning with clinical manifestations and progression patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified and validated three distinct NPS subtypes, underscoring the role of NPSs in neurobiological mechanisms and progression of the AD continuum.</p>","PeriodicalId":8918,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiomics Reveals Biological Mechanisms Linking Macroscale Structural Covariance Network Dysfunction With Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Across the Alzheimer's Disease Continuum.\",\"authors\":\"Jiwei Jiang, Kun Zhao, Wenyi Li, Peiyang Zheng, Shirui Jiang, Qiwei Ren, Yunyun Duan, Huiying Yu, Xiaopeng Kang, Junjie Li, Ke Hu, Tianlin Jiang, Min Zhao, Linlin Wang, Shiyi Yang, Huiying Zhang, Yaou Liu, Anxin Wang, Yong Liu, Jun Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.08.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The highly heterogeneity of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs) hinder further exploration of their role in neurobiological mechanisms and Alzheimer's disease (AD). We aimed to delineate NPS patterns based on brain macroscale connectomics to understand the biological mechanisms of NPSs on the AD continuum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We constructed Regional Radiomics Similarity Networks (R2SN) for 550 participants (AD with NPSs [AD-NPS, n=376], AD without NPSs [AD-nNPS, n=111], and normal controls [n=63]) from CIBL study. We identified R2SN connections associated with NPSs, and then cluster distinct subtypes of AD-NPS. An independent dataset (n=189) and internal validation were performed to assess the robustness of the NPS subtypes. Subsequent multiomics analysis were performed to assess the distinct clinical phenotype and biological mechanisms in each NPS subtype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AD-NPS patients were clustered into severe (n=187), moderate (n=87), and mild NPS (n=102) subtypes, each exhibiting distinct brain network dysfunction patterns. A high level of consistency in clustering NPS was internally and externally validated. Severe and moderate NPSs showed significant cognitive impairment, increased plasma p-Tau<sub>181</sub> levels, extensive decreased brain volume and cortical thickness, and accelerated cognitive decline. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed enrichment of differentially expressed genes in ion transport and synaptic transmission with variations for each NPS subtype. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) analysis defined the specific gene loci for each subtype of AD-NPS (i.e, logical memory), aligning with clinical manifestations and progression patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified and validated three distinct NPS subtypes, underscoring the role of NPSs in neurobiological mechanisms and progression of the AD continuum.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.08.027\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.08.027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经精神症状(NPSs)的高度异质性阻碍了对其在神经生物学机制和阿尔茨海默病(AD)中作用的进一步探索。我们的目的是根据大脑宏观尺度连接组学划分神经精神症状模式,以了解神经精神症状在阿尔茨海默病中的生物学机制:我们构建了CIBL研究中550名参与者(有NPS的AD患者[AD-NPS,n=376]、无NPS的AD患者[AD-nNPS,n=111]和正常对照组[n=63])的区域放射组学相似性网络(R2SN)。我们确定了与 NPSs 相关的 R2SN 连接,然后对 AD-NPS 的不同亚型进行了聚类。为了评估NPS亚型的稳健性,我们进行了独立数据集(n=189)和内部验证。随后进行的多组学分析评估了每种NPS亚型的不同临床表型和生物学机制:结果:AD-NPS患者被分为重度(187人)、中度(87人)和轻度NPS(102人)亚型,每种亚型都表现出不同的脑网络功能障碍模式。经内部和外部验证,NPS 的聚类具有高度一致性。重度和中度 NPS 表现出明显的认知障碍、血浆 p-Tau181 水平升高、脑容量和皮质厚度广泛减少以及认知能力加速衰退。基因组富集分析(Gene set enrichment analysis,GSEA)显示,离子转运和突触传递中的差异表达基因在每个 NPS 亚型中都有不同。全基因组关联研究(GWAS)分析确定了AD-NPS各亚型(即逻辑记忆)的特定基因位点,并与临床表现和进展模式相一致:本研究发现并验证了三种不同的NPS亚型,强调了NPS在神经生物学机制和AD进展中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiomics Reveals Biological Mechanisms Linking Macroscale Structural Covariance Network Dysfunction With Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Across the Alzheimer's Disease Continuum.

Background: The highly heterogeneity of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs) hinder further exploration of their role in neurobiological mechanisms and Alzheimer's disease (AD). We aimed to delineate NPS patterns based on brain macroscale connectomics to understand the biological mechanisms of NPSs on the AD continuum.

Methods: We constructed Regional Radiomics Similarity Networks (R2SN) for 550 participants (AD with NPSs [AD-NPS, n=376], AD without NPSs [AD-nNPS, n=111], and normal controls [n=63]) from CIBL study. We identified R2SN connections associated with NPSs, and then cluster distinct subtypes of AD-NPS. An independent dataset (n=189) and internal validation were performed to assess the robustness of the NPS subtypes. Subsequent multiomics analysis were performed to assess the distinct clinical phenotype and biological mechanisms in each NPS subtype.

Results: AD-NPS patients were clustered into severe (n=187), moderate (n=87), and mild NPS (n=102) subtypes, each exhibiting distinct brain network dysfunction patterns. A high level of consistency in clustering NPS was internally and externally validated. Severe and moderate NPSs showed significant cognitive impairment, increased plasma p-Tau181 levels, extensive decreased brain volume and cortical thickness, and accelerated cognitive decline. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed enrichment of differentially expressed genes in ion transport and synaptic transmission with variations for each NPS subtype. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) analysis defined the specific gene loci for each subtype of AD-NPS (i.e, logical memory), aligning with clinical manifestations and progression patterns.

Conclusions: This study identified and validated three distinct NPS subtypes, underscoring the role of NPSs in neurobiological mechanisms and progression of the AD continuum.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Psychiatry
Biological Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
18.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
1398
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Biological Psychiatry is an official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatry and was established in 1969. It is the first journal in the Biological Psychiatry family, which also includes Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging and Biological Psychiatry: Global Open Science. The Society's main goal is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in the fields related to the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders pertaining to thought, emotion, and behavior. To fulfill this mission, Biological Psychiatry publishes peer-reviewed, rapid-publication articles that present new findings from original basic, translational, and clinical mechanistic research, ultimately advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal also encourages the submission of reviews and commentaries on current research and topics of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信