评估暴饮暴食情感调节模型中暴饮暴食计划和暴饮暴食必然性的作用。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Glen Forester , Lauren M. Schaefer , Jeffrey S. Johnson , Brianne N. Richson , Robert D. Dvorak , Ross D. Crosby , Carol B. Peterson , Stephen A. Wonderlich
{"title":"评估暴饮暴食情感调节模型中暴饮暴食计划和暴饮暴食必然性的作用。","authors":"Glen Forester ,&nbsp;Lauren M. Schaefer ,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. Johnson ,&nbsp;Brianne N. Richson ,&nbsp;Robert D. Dvorak ,&nbsp;Ross D. Crosby ,&nbsp;Carol B. Peterson ,&nbsp;Stephen A. Wonderlich","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Affect regulation models posit that aversive affective states drive binge-eating behavior, which then regulates negative emotions. However, recent findings among individuals with binge-eating disorder (BED) suggest that food-related anticipatory processes may precede and potentially explain the negative affect thought to drive binge eating. Specifically, studies using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) demonstrate that the negative affective state of “Guilt” (from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule) most strongly predicts later binge eating in the natural environment, and it has been hypothesized that planning a binge or feeling that a binge-eating episode is inventible may account for the increases in Guilt observed prior to binge episodes. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that binge planning or inevitability may contribute to feelings of shame (a key facet of the broader Guilt construct), which then predict binge-eating episodes, using EMA in 43 individuals with BED. Consistent with hypotheses, feelings of binge inevitability and planning prospectively predicted binge-eating episodes. Further, binge planning predicted subsequent increases in shame. However, shame did not predict subsequent increases in binge planning. Finally, a mediation model revealed that binge planning (Time 1) predicted future binge eating (Time 3) directly and indirectly through increases in shame (Time 2). The results provide novel evidence that individuals with BED anticipate and actively plan for binge-eating episodes, and that binge planning may explain the increased shame/guilt typically observed before binge eating. Overall, accruing evidence suggests that negative affect, although predictive of binge eating, may be better conceptualized as a consequence of the anticipatory processes that lead to binge eating, rather than the starting point, at least among some individuals with BED. Future experimental research is needed to more conclusively test this hypothesis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 107719"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the role of binge planning and binge inevitability within affect regulation models of binge eating\",\"authors\":\"Glen Forester ,&nbsp;Lauren M. Schaefer ,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. Johnson ,&nbsp;Brianne N. Richson ,&nbsp;Robert D. Dvorak ,&nbsp;Ross D. Crosby ,&nbsp;Carol B. Peterson ,&nbsp;Stephen A. Wonderlich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Affect regulation models posit that aversive affective states drive binge-eating behavior, which then regulates negative emotions. However, recent findings among individuals with binge-eating disorder (BED) suggest that food-related anticipatory processes may precede and potentially explain the negative affect thought to drive binge eating. Specifically, studies using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) demonstrate that the negative affective state of “Guilt” (from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule) most strongly predicts later binge eating in the natural environment, and it has been hypothesized that planning a binge or feeling that a binge-eating episode is inventible may account for the increases in Guilt observed prior to binge episodes. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that binge planning or inevitability may contribute to feelings of shame (a key facet of the broader Guilt construct), which then predict binge-eating episodes, using EMA in 43 individuals with BED. Consistent with hypotheses, feelings of binge inevitability and planning prospectively predicted binge-eating episodes. Further, binge planning predicted subsequent increases in shame. However, shame did not predict subsequent increases in binge planning. Finally, a mediation model revealed that binge planning (Time 1) predicted future binge eating (Time 3) directly and indirectly through increases in shame (Time 2). The results provide novel evidence that individuals with BED anticipate and actively plan for binge-eating episodes, and that binge planning may explain the increased shame/guilt typically observed before binge eating. Overall, accruing evidence suggests that negative affect, although predictive of binge eating, may be better conceptualized as a consequence of the anticipatory processes that lead to binge eating, rather than the starting point, at least among some individuals with BED. Future experimental research is needed to more conclusively test this hypothesis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\"203 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107719\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666324005233\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666324005233","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

情绪调节模型认为,厌恶情绪状态会驱动暴食行为,进而调节负面情绪。然而,最近在暴饮暴食症(BED)患者中的研究结果表明,与食物相关的预期过程可能先于并有可能解释被认为会驱动暴饮暴食的负面情绪。具体来说,使用生态瞬间评估(EMA)进行的研究表明,"内疚"(来自积极和消极情绪表)这种消极情绪状态最能预测日后在自然环境中的暴饮暴食行为,因此有人推测,计划暴饮暴食或感觉暴饮暴食是不可避免的,可能是暴饮暴食发作前 "内疚 "增加的原因。在本研究中,我们利用 43 名 BED 患者的 EMA 测试了狂欢计划或不可避免性可能会导致羞愧感(更广泛的内疚感结构的一个关键方面),进而预测狂欢饮食发作的假设。与假设一致的是,狂欢不可避免感和计划感会预测狂欢饮食发作。此外,狂欢计划还能预测随后羞耻感的增加。然而,羞耻感并不能预测随后狂欢计划的增加。最后,一个中介模型显示,狂欢计划(时间 1)直接预测了未来的狂欢进食(时间 3),并通过羞耻感的增加(时间 2)间接预测了未来的狂欢进食。这些结果提供了新的证据,表明患有 BED 的个体会预期并积极计划暴饮暴食发作,而暴饮暴食计划可以解释暴饮暴食前通常会出现的羞耻感/内疚感增加。总之,越来越多的证据表明,消极情绪虽然可以预测暴饮暴食,但至少在某些 BED 患者中,消极情绪最好被概念化为导致暴饮暴食的预期过程的结果,而不是暴饮暴食的起点。未来的实验研究需要对这一假设进行更确凿的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the role of binge planning and binge inevitability within affect regulation models of binge eating
Affect regulation models posit that aversive affective states drive binge-eating behavior, which then regulates negative emotions. However, recent findings among individuals with binge-eating disorder (BED) suggest that food-related anticipatory processes may precede and potentially explain the negative affect thought to drive binge eating. Specifically, studies using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) demonstrate that the negative affective state of “Guilt” (from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule) most strongly predicts later binge eating in the natural environment, and it has been hypothesized that planning a binge or feeling that a binge-eating episode is inventible may account for the increases in Guilt observed prior to binge episodes. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that binge planning or inevitability may contribute to feelings of shame (a key facet of the broader Guilt construct), which then predict binge-eating episodes, using EMA in 43 individuals with BED. Consistent with hypotheses, feelings of binge inevitability and planning prospectively predicted binge-eating episodes. Further, binge planning predicted subsequent increases in shame. However, shame did not predict subsequent increases in binge planning. Finally, a mediation model revealed that binge planning (Time 1) predicted future binge eating (Time 3) directly and indirectly through increases in shame (Time 2). The results provide novel evidence that individuals with BED anticipate and actively plan for binge-eating episodes, and that binge planning may explain the increased shame/guilt typically observed before binge eating. Overall, accruing evidence suggests that negative affect, although predictive of binge eating, may be better conceptualized as a consequence of the anticipatory processes that lead to binge eating, rather than the starting point, at least among some individuals with BED. Future experimental research is needed to more conclusively test this hypothesis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信