北方芬兰牛与荷斯坦牛青贮谷物饲粮的生长性能、胴体特征和肉质比较

JSFA reports Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1002/jsf2.218
Liisa Keto, Katariina Manni, Anne Tuomivaara, Päivi Soppela, Arto Huuskonen
{"title":"北方芬兰牛与荷斯坦牛青贮谷物饲粮的生长性能、胴体特征和肉质比较","authors":"Liisa Keto,&nbsp;Katariina Manni,&nbsp;Anne Tuomivaara,&nbsp;Päivi Soppela,&nbsp;Arto Huuskonen","doi":"10.1002/jsf2.218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Finnish beef production is largely based on dairy breeds. Eastern Finncattle, Western Finncattle, and Northern Finncattle (NFC) are native breeds, whereas Holstein (HO) and Nordic Red are the most important commercial dairy breeds. The NFC has been the closest to extinction among Finnish native cattle breeds. The objective of the experiment was to provide data on meat quality of NFC compared to HO. To our knowledge no previously published scientific data about the meat quality traits of NFC is available.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The targeted slaughter age was 600 days for both NFC and HO. The carcass gain of the HO steers was 60% higher compared to NFC steers. No breed differences in dressing proportion, carcass conformation, or carcass fat score were observed. Breed had no effect on the pH, color, drip loss, chemical composition, shear force value, or sensory tenderness of the <i>longissimus lumborum</i> muscle. However, beef flavor of the NFC steers was evaluated 7% better compared to the HO steers. In addition, the <i>longissimus lumborum</i> muscle of the NFC steers tended to be juicier than that of the HO steers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Only little variability in meat quality traits was observed between the breeds. However, NFC requires a longer growing period than HO when targeting the same carcass weight. To promote the use of the NFC in beef production, it is necessary to find other than economic production efficiency features, which would provide added value for premium meat quality to compensate the lower production efficiency.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93795,"journal":{"name":"JSFA reports","volume":"4 10","pages":"362-369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jsf2.218","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Northern Finncattle steers compared to Holstein steers offered grass silage-grain-based ration\",\"authors\":\"Liisa Keto,&nbsp;Katariina Manni,&nbsp;Anne Tuomivaara,&nbsp;Päivi Soppela,&nbsp;Arto Huuskonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jsf2.218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Finnish beef production is largely based on dairy breeds. Eastern Finncattle, Western Finncattle, and Northern Finncattle (NFC) are native breeds, whereas Holstein (HO) and Nordic Red are the most important commercial dairy breeds. The NFC has been the closest to extinction among Finnish native cattle breeds. The objective of the experiment was to provide data on meat quality of NFC compared to HO. To our knowledge no previously published scientific data about the meat quality traits of NFC is available.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The targeted slaughter age was 600 days for both NFC and HO. The carcass gain of the HO steers was 60% higher compared to NFC steers. No breed differences in dressing proportion, carcass conformation, or carcass fat score were observed. Breed had no effect on the pH, color, drip loss, chemical composition, shear force value, or sensory tenderness of the <i>longissimus lumborum</i> muscle. However, beef flavor of the NFC steers was evaluated 7% better compared to the HO steers. In addition, the <i>longissimus lumborum</i> muscle of the NFC steers tended to be juicier than that of the HO steers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Only little variability in meat quality traits was observed between the breeds. However, NFC requires a longer growing period than HO when targeting the same carcass weight. To promote the use of the NFC in beef production, it is necessary to find other than economic production efficiency features, which would provide added value for premium meat quality to compensate the lower production efficiency.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSFA reports\",\"volume\":\"4 10\",\"pages\":\"362-369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jsf2.218\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSFA reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsf2.218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSFA reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsf2.218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 芬兰的牛肉生产主要以奶牛品种为基础。东部芬卡牛、西部芬卡牛和北部芬卡牛(NFC)是本土品种,而荷斯坦牛(HO)和北欧红牛则是最重要的商业奶牛品种。在芬兰本土牛种中,NFC最接近灭绝。实验的目的是提供 NFC 与荷斯坦牛相比的肉质数据。据我们所知,目前还没有关于 NFC 肉质特征的科学数据。 结果 NFC 和 HO 的目标屠宰日龄均为 600 天。与 NFC 牛相比,HO 牛的胴体增重高出 60%。在拌料比例、胴体构型或胴体脂肪评分方面没有观察到品种差异。牛种对腰长肌的 pH 值、颜色、滴水损失、化学成分、剪切力值或感觉柔软度没有影响。然而,NFC 牛的牛肉风味比 HO 牛好 7%。此外,NFC 牛的腰长肌往往比 HO 牛的腰长肌更加多汁。 结论 在不同品种之间,肉质性状的差异很小。然而,在胴体重量相同的情况下,NFC 比 HO 需要更长的生长期。为了在牛肉生产中推广使用 NFC,有必要找到除经济生产效率以外的其他特征,以提供优质肉质的附加值来弥补较低的生产效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Northern Finncattle steers compared to Holstein steers offered grass silage-grain-based ration

Background

Finnish beef production is largely based on dairy breeds. Eastern Finncattle, Western Finncattle, and Northern Finncattle (NFC) are native breeds, whereas Holstein (HO) and Nordic Red are the most important commercial dairy breeds. The NFC has been the closest to extinction among Finnish native cattle breeds. The objective of the experiment was to provide data on meat quality of NFC compared to HO. To our knowledge no previously published scientific data about the meat quality traits of NFC is available.

Results

The targeted slaughter age was 600 days for both NFC and HO. The carcass gain of the HO steers was 60% higher compared to NFC steers. No breed differences in dressing proportion, carcass conformation, or carcass fat score were observed. Breed had no effect on the pH, color, drip loss, chemical composition, shear force value, or sensory tenderness of the longissimus lumborum muscle. However, beef flavor of the NFC steers was evaluated 7% better compared to the HO steers. In addition, the longissimus lumborum muscle of the NFC steers tended to be juicier than that of the HO steers.

Conclusions

Only little variability in meat quality traits was observed between the breeds. However, NFC requires a longer growing period than HO when targeting the same carcass weight. To promote the use of the NFC in beef production, it is necessary to find other than economic production efficiency features, which would provide added value for premium meat quality to compensate the lower production efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信