改善外科教育体验:教育超时试点研究的 9 个月结果

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Jennifer E. Kaiser MD , Gentry Carter MS , Gary Sutkin MD , Susanna R. Cohen DNP, CNM , Heather Campbell MD
{"title":"改善外科教育体验:教育超时试点研究的 9 个月结果","authors":"Jennifer E. Kaiser MD ,&nbsp;Gentry Carter MS ,&nbsp;Gary Sutkin MD ,&nbsp;Susanna R. Cohen DNP, CNM ,&nbsp;Heather Campbell MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.103305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to: 1) create a Surgical Education Time-Out Tool (SET-OuT) checklist training module for faculty utilizing a highly-realistic simulation and 2) assess faculty and resident perioperative educational experiences pre- and post-SET-OuT intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3><div>We recruited gynecologic surgical faculty and PGY1 to PGY3 obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residents from the University of Utah. Each enrolled participant completed a baseline and 9-month survey about their educational experiences and SET-OuT satisfaction. Faculty enrollment required completion of highly-realistic SET-OuT simulation with a simulated resident actor. We compared individual measures and composite teacher self-efficacy scale and composite resident procedural self-confidence scale between time points using rank sum tests. We converted Likert-scale items to 5-point scales and used mixed linear models to investigate whether relationships persisted after accounting for individual surgeons’ and residents’ effects.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-five of 62 (40%) faculty and 15/17 (88%) residents enrolled with 100% baseline survey completion. Twenty of 25 (80%) faculty and 12/15 (80%) residents completed the 9-month survey. Faculty scored a median 34/45 points on the self-efficacy scale at baseline and 41/45 points at 9 months (p &lt; 0.01). Faculty demonstrated a 0.9-point improvement in teaching performance satisfaction (p &lt; 0.01). Residents’ procedural self-confidence was 16.5/30 at baseline and 22/30 at 9-months (p = 0.01) and felt their value and input in the surgical education experience improved. Residents reported improved satisfaction with feedback at 9-months compared to baseline (p = 0.01). Faculty and residents reported 85% and 100% satisfaction with the ETO as a teaching tool, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Implementation of a perioperative SET-OuT improved faculty teaching self-efficacy and resident procedural confidence. Both groups highly rated the SET-OuT as an acceptable perioperative teaching tool.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"81 12","pages":"Article 103305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Surgical Education Experience: 9-month Outcomes of an Education Time-Out Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer E. Kaiser MD ,&nbsp;Gentry Carter MS ,&nbsp;Gary Sutkin MD ,&nbsp;Susanna R. Cohen DNP, CNM ,&nbsp;Heather Campbell MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.103305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to: 1) create a Surgical Education Time-Out Tool (SET-OuT) checklist training module for faculty utilizing a highly-realistic simulation and 2) assess faculty and resident perioperative educational experiences pre- and post-SET-OuT intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3><div>We recruited gynecologic surgical faculty and PGY1 to PGY3 obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residents from the University of Utah. Each enrolled participant completed a baseline and 9-month survey about their educational experiences and SET-OuT satisfaction. Faculty enrollment required completion of highly-realistic SET-OuT simulation with a simulated resident actor. We compared individual measures and composite teacher self-efficacy scale and composite resident procedural self-confidence scale between time points using rank sum tests. We converted Likert-scale items to 5-point scales and used mixed linear models to investigate whether relationships persisted after accounting for individual surgeons’ and residents’ effects.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-five of 62 (40%) faculty and 15/17 (88%) residents enrolled with 100% baseline survey completion. Twenty of 25 (80%) faculty and 12/15 (80%) residents completed the 9-month survey. Faculty scored a median 34/45 points on the self-efficacy scale at baseline and 41/45 points at 9 months (p &lt; 0.01). Faculty demonstrated a 0.9-point improvement in teaching performance satisfaction (p &lt; 0.01). Residents’ procedural self-confidence was 16.5/30 at baseline and 22/30 at 9-months (p = 0.01) and felt their value and input in the surgical education experience improved. Residents reported improved satisfaction with feedback at 9-months compared to baseline (p = 0.01). Faculty and residents reported 85% and 100% satisfaction with the ETO as a teaching tool, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Implementation of a perioperative SET-OuT improved faculty teaching self-efficacy and resident procedural confidence. Both groups highly rated the SET-OuT as an acceptable perioperative teaching tool.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":\"81 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 103305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004537\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004537","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标我们的目的是1)利用高度逼真的模拟为教师创建外科教育超时工具(SET-OuT)检查表培训模块;2)评估教师和住院医师在 SET-OuT 干预前后的围手术期教育经验。设计、设置和参与者我们从犹他大学招募了妇科手术教师和 PGY1 至 PGY3 妇产科住院医师。每位参加者都完成了基线调查和为期 9 个月的调查,了解他们的教育经历和 SET-OuT 满意度。教师注册要求与模拟住院医师演员一起完成高度逼真的 SET-OuT 模拟。我们使用秩和检验比较了不同时间点之间的单项测量、综合教师自我效能量表和综合住院医师程序自信量表。我们将李克特量表项目转换为 5 点量表,并使用混合线性模型来研究在考虑了外科医生和住院医师的个体影响后,两者之间的关系是否仍然存在。25名教员中有20名(80%)和12/15名住院医师(80%)完成了为期9个月的调查。教员在自我效能感量表上的基线得分中位数为 34/45 分,9 个月时为 41/45 分(p < 0.01)。教员的教学表现满意度提高了 0.9 分(p < 0.01)。住院医师的手术自信心在基线时为 16.5/30,在 9 个月时为 22/30(p = 0.01),并认为自己在外科教育经验中的价值和投入得到了提高。与基线相比,住院医生在 9 个月时对反馈的满意度有所提高(p = 0.01)。教员和住院医师对 ETO 作为教学工具的满意度分别为 85% 和 100% 。两组居民都高度评价 SET-OuT 是一种可接受的围手术期教学工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the Surgical Education Experience: 9-month Outcomes of an Education Time-Out Pilot Study

Objective

We aimed to: 1) create a Surgical Education Time-Out Tool (SET-OuT) checklist training module for faculty utilizing a highly-realistic simulation and 2) assess faculty and resident perioperative educational experiences pre- and post-SET-OuT intervention.

Design, Setting, and Participants

We recruited gynecologic surgical faculty and PGY1 to PGY3 obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residents from the University of Utah. Each enrolled participant completed a baseline and 9-month survey about their educational experiences and SET-OuT satisfaction. Faculty enrollment required completion of highly-realistic SET-OuT simulation with a simulated resident actor. We compared individual measures and composite teacher self-efficacy scale and composite resident procedural self-confidence scale between time points using rank sum tests. We converted Likert-scale items to 5-point scales and used mixed linear models to investigate whether relationships persisted after accounting for individual surgeons’ and residents’ effects.

Results

Twenty-five of 62 (40%) faculty and 15/17 (88%) residents enrolled with 100% baseline survey completion. Twenty of 25 (80%) faculty and 12/15 (80%) residents completed the 9-month survey. Faculty scored a median 34/45 points on the self-efficacy scale at baseline and 41/45 points at 9 months (p < 0.01). Faculty demonstrated a 0.9-point improvement in teaching performance satisfaction (p < 0.01). Residents’ procedural self-confidence was 16.5/30 at baseline and 22/30 at 9-months (p = 0.01) and felt their value and input in the surgical education experience improved. Residents reported improved satisfaction with feedback at 9-months compared to baseline (p = 0.01). Faculty and residents reported 85% and 100% satisfaction with the ETO as a teaching tool, respectively.

Conclusions

Implementation of a perioperative SET-OuT improved faculty teaching self-efficacy and resident procedural confidence. Both groups highly rated the SET-OuT as an acceptable perioperative teaching tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信