Benjamin Rail BS, Andres A. Abreu MD, Emile Farah MD, Daniel J. Scott MD, Ganesh Sankaranarayanan PhD, Herbert J. Zeh III MD, Patricio M. Polanco MD
{"title":"机器人生物组织肠吻合术的学习曲线:对外科培训课程的启示","authors":"Benjamin Rail BS, Andres A. Abreu MD, Emile Farah MD, Daniel J. Scott MD, Ganesh Sankaranarayanan PhD, Herbert J. Zeh III MD, Patricio M. Polanco MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>The integration of robotic surgical training in a time-scarce residency program is a challenge for surgical educators. Simulation-based training is a tool that allows residents to acquire the necessary robotic skills without compromising patient safety. This study aimed to assess the learning curve of a robotic inanimate intestinal anastomosis drill.</div></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><div>Two trained graders performed a video-based assessment of each attempt of a side-to-side intestinal anastomosis drill using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) scale. Residents who achieved a passing score of 28 were included in the study. We assessed the number of attempts required to achieve a passing score and evaluated technical performance on different OSATS domains. Data were analyzed using independent t-test, 1-way ANOVA, and binary logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><div>The University of Texas Southwestern</div></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANTS</h3><div>33 residents across 4 academic years</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Thirty-three residents performed 139 attempts with a mean of 4.2 ± 2 attempts per resident. On average, 3.3 attempts were required to achieve a passing score. Average OSATS score increased from 21.7 to 27.2 between the 1st and the 4th attempt, respectively (p < 0.001). Of the OSATS subcategories, time and motion showed the greatest score improvement of 1.5 on a 5-point Likert scale, 95% CI [0.82, 2.18] (p < 0.001). Despite varying baseline OSATS scores between residents on initial assessment, there was no significant difference in the final attempt score. On the initial attempt, a lower score and failure to finish were associated with greater odds of requiring 5 or more attempts to pass the drill.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>All OSATS metrics improved on an intestinal anastomosis drill after simulation training. A maximum of 6 attempts were required to achieve a passing score. Initial performance strongly predicts the number of attempts required to achieve a passing score. This feasible and effective drill provides trainees with robotic intestinal anastomosis training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"81 12","pages":"Article 103296"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Curve of a Robotic Bio-Tissue Intestinal Anastomosis: Implications for Surgical Training Curricula\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Rail BS, Andres A. Abreu MD, Emile Farah MD, Daniel J. Scott MD, Ganesh Sankaranarayanan PhD, Herbert J. Zeh III MD, Patricio M. Polanco MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.09.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>The integration of robotic surgical training in a time-scarce residency program is a challenge for surgical educators. Simulation-based training is a tool that allows residents to acquire the necessary robotic skills without compromising patient safety. This study aimed to assess the learning curve of a robotic inanimate intestinal anastomosis drill.</div></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><div>Two trained graders performed a video-based assessment of each attempt of a side-to-side intestinal anastomosis drill using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) scale. Residents who achieved a passing score of 28 were included in the study. We assessed the number of attempts required to achieve a passing score and evaluated technical performance on different OSATS domains. Data were analyzed using independent t-test, 1-way ANOVA, and binary logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><div>The University of Texas Southwestern</div></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANTS</h3><div>33 residents across 4 academic years</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Thirty-three residents performed 139 attempts with a mean of 4.2 ± 2 attempts per resident. On average, 3.3 attempts were required to achieve a passing score. Average OSATS score increased from 21.7 to 27.2 between the 1st and the 4th attempt, respectively (p < 0.001). Of the OSATS subcategories, time and motion showed the greatest score improvement of 1.5 on a 5-point Likert scale, 95% CI [0.82, 2.18] (p < 0.001). Despite varying baseline OSATS scores between residents on initial assessment, there was no significant difference in the final attempt score. On the initial attempt, a lower score and failure to finish were associated with greater odds of requiring 5 or more attempts to pass the drill.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>All OSATS metrics improved on an intestinal anastomosis drill after simulation training. A maximum of 6 attempts were required to achieve a passing score. Initial performance strongly predicts the number of attempts required to achieve a passing score. This feasible and effective drill provides trainees with robotic intestinal anastomosis training.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":\"81 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 103296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004355\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004355","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Learning Curve of a Robotic Bio-Tissue Intestinal Anastomosis: Implications for Surgical Training Curricula
OBJECTIVE
The integration of robotic surgical training in a time-scarce residency program is a challenge for surgical educators. Simulation-based training is a tool that allows residents to acquire the necessary robotic skills without compromising patient safety. This study aimed to assess the learning curve of a robotic inanimate intestinal anastomosis drill.
DESIGN
Two trained graders performed a video-based assessment of each attempt of a side-to-side intestinal anastomosis drill using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) scale. Residents who achieved a passing score of 28 were included in the study. We assessed the number of attempts required to achieve a passing score and evaluated technical performance on different OSATS domains. Data were analyzed using independent t-test, 1-way ANOVA, and binary logistic regression.
SETTING
The University of Texas Southwestern
PARTICIPANTS
33 residents across 4 academic years
RESULTS
Thirty-three residents performed 139 attempts with a mean of 4.2 ± 2 attempts per resident. On average, 3.3 attempts were required to achieve a passing score. Average OSATS score increased from 21.7 to 27.2 between the 1st and the 4th attempt, respectively (p < 0.001). Of the OSATS subcategories, time and motion showed the greatest score improvement of 1.5 on a 5-point Likert scale, 95% CI [0.82, 2.18] (p < 0.001). Despite varying baseline OSATS scores between residents on initial assessment, there was no significant difference in the final attempt score. On the initial attempt, a lower score and failure to finish were associated with greater odds of requiring 5 or more attempts to pass the drill.
CONCLUSION
All OSATS metrics improved on an intestinal anastomosis drill after simulation training. A maximum of 6 attempts were required to achieve a passing score. Initial performance strongly predicts the number of attempts required to achieve a passing score. This feasible and effective drill provides trainees with robotic intestinal anastomosis training.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.