机器人生物组织肠吻合术的学习曲线:对外科培训课程的启示

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Benjamin Rail BS, Andres A. Abreu MD, Emile Farah MD, Daniel J. Scott MD, Ganesh Sankaranarayanan PhD, Herbert J. Zeh III MD, Patricio M. Polanco MD
{"title":"机器人生物组织肠吻合术的学习曲线:对外科培训课程的启示","authors":"Benjamin Rail BS,&nbsp;Andres A. Abreu MD,&nbsp;Emile Farah MD,&nbsp;Daniel J. Scott MD,&nbsp;Ganesh Sankaranarayanan PhD,&nbsp;Herbert J. Zeh III MD,&nbsp;Patricio M. Polanco MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>The integration of robotic surgical training in a time-scarce residency program is a challenge for surgical educators. Simulation-based training is a tool that allows residents to acquire the necessary robotic skills without compromising patient safety. This study aimed to assess the learning curve of a robotic inanimate intestinal anastomosis drill.</div></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><div>Two trained graders performed a video-based assessment of each attempt of a side-to-side intestinal anastomosis drill using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) scale. Residents who achieved a passing score of 28 were included in the study. We assessed the number of attempts required to achieve a passing score and evaluated technical performance on different OSATS domains. Data were analyzed using independent t-test, 1-way ANOVA, and binary logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><div>The University of Texas Southwestern</div></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANTS</h3><div>33 residents across 4 academic years</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Thirty-three residents performed 139 attempts with a mean of 4.2 ± 2 attempts per resident. On average, 3.3 attempts were required to achieve a passing score. Average OSATS score increased from 21.7 to 27.2 between the 1st and the 4th attempt, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). Of the OSATS subcategories, time and motion showed the greatest score improvement of 1.5 on a 5-point Likert scale, 95% CI [0.82, 2.18] (p &lt; 0.001). Despite varying baseline OSATS scores between residents on initial assessment, there was no significant difference in the final attempt score. On the initial attempt, a lower score and failure to finish were associated with greater odds of requiring 5 or more attempts to pass the drill.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>All OSATS metrics improved on an intestinal anastomosis drill after simulation training. A maximum of 6 attempts were required to achieve a passing score. Initial performance strongly predicts the number of attempts required to achieve a passing score. This feasible and effective drill provides trainees with robotic intestinal anastomosis training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"81 12","pages":"Article 103296"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Curve of a Robotic Bio-Tissue Intestinal Anastomosis: Implications for Surgical Training Curricula\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Rail BS,&nbsp;Andres A. Abreu MD,&nbsp;Emile Farah MD,&nbsp;Daniel J. Scott MD,&nbsp;Ganesh Sankaranarayanan PhD,&nbsp;Herbert J. Zeh III MD,&nbsp;Patricio M. Polanco MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.09.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>The integration of robotic surgical training in a time-scarce residency program is a challenge for surgical educators. Simulation-based training is a tool that allows residents to acquire the necessary robotic skills without compromising patient safety. This study aimed to assess the learning curve of a robotic inanimate intestinal anastomosis drill.</div></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><div>Two trained graders performed a video-based assessment of each attempt of a side-to-side intestinal anastomosis drill using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) scale. Residents who achieved a passing score of 28 were included in the study. We assessed the number of attempts required to achieve a passing score and evaluated technical performance on different OSATS domains. Data were analyzed using independent t-test, 1-way ANOVA, and binary logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><div>The University of Texas Southwestern</div></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANTS</h3><div>33 residents across 4 academic years</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Thirty-three residents performed 139 attempts with a mean of 4.2 ± 2 attempts per resident. On average, 3.3 attempts were required to achieve a passing score. Average OSATS score increased from 21.7 to 27.2 between the 1st and the 4th attempt, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). Of the OSATS subcategories, time and motion showed the greatest score improvement of 1.5 on a 5-point Likert scale, 95% CI [0.82, 2.18] (p &lt; 0.001). Despite varying baseline OSATS scores between residents on initial assessment, there was no significant difference in the final attempt score. On the initial attempt, a lower score and failure to finish were associated with greater odds of requiring 5 or more attempts to pass the drill.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>All OSATS metrics improved on an intestinal anastomosis drill after simulation training. A maximum of 6 attempts were required to achieve a passing score. Initial performance strongly predicts the number of attempts required to achieve a passing score. This feasible and effective drill provides trainees with robotic intestinal anastomosis training.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":\"81 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 103296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004355\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004355","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在时间紧缺的住院医师培训项目中融入机器人手术培训是外科教育工作者面临的一项挑战。基于模拟的培训是一种既能让住院医师掌握必要的机器人技能,又不影响患者安全的工具。本研究旨在评估机器人无生命肠道吻合术演练的学习曲线。设计两名经过培训的评分员使用技术技能客观结构化评估(OSATS)量表对每次侧向肠道吻合术演练尝试进行视频评估。获得 28 分及格分数的住院医师被纳入研究范围。我们评估了达到及格分数所需的尝试次数,并评估了不同 OSATS 领域的技术表现。采用独立 t 检验、单因素方差分析和二元逻辑回归分析数据。研究地点德克萨斯大学西南分校研究对象33名住院医师,共 4 个学年研究结果33 名住院医师共进行了 139 次尝试,平均每位住院医师尝试 4.2 次(± 2)。平均需要尝试 3.3 次才能获得及格分数。在第 1 次和第 4 次尝试之间,OSATS 平均得分分别从 21.7 分增至 27.2 分(p < 0.001)。在 OSATS 的子类别中,时间和运动的得分提高幅度最大,在 5 分李克特量表上提高了 1.5 分,95% CI [0.82, 2.18] (p < 0.001)。尽管住院医师在初次评估时的 OSATS 基线得分各不相同,但最终尝试得分却没有显著差异。结论模拟训练后,所有 OSATS 指标在肠吻合术演练中都有所提高。最多需要尝试 6 次才能达到及格分数。最初的表现能很好地预测达到及格分数所需的尝试次数。这种可行而有效的训练为学员提供了机器人肠道吻合训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning Curve of a Robotic Bio-Tissue Intestinal Anastomosis: Implications for Surgical Training Curricula

OBJECTIVE

The integration of robotic surgical training in a time-scarce residency program is a challenge for surgical educators. Simulation-based training is a tool that allows residents to acquire the necessary robotic skills without compromising patient safety. This study aimed to assess the learning curve of a robotic inanimate intestinal anastomosis drill.

DESIGN

Two trained graders performed a video-based assessment of each attempt of a side-to-side intestinal anastomosis drill using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) scale. Residents who achieved a passing score of 28 were included in the study. We assessed the number of attempts required to achieve a passing score and evaluated technical performance on different OSATS domains. Data were analyzed using independent t-test, 1-way ANOVA, and binary logistic regression.

SETTING

The University of Texas Southwestern

PARTICIPANTS

33 residents across 4 academic years

RESULTS

Thirty-three residents performed 139 attempts with a mean of 4.2 ± 2 attempts per resident. On average, 3.3 attempts were required to achieve a passing score. Average OSATS score increased from 21.7 to 27.2 between the 1st and the 4th attempt, respectively (p < 0.001). Of the OSATS subcategories, time and motion showed the greatest score improvement of 1.5 on a 5-point Likert scale, 95% CI [0.82, 2.18] (p < 0.001). Despite varying baseline OSATS scores between residents on initial assessment, there was no significant difference in the final attempt score. On the initial attempt, a lower score and failure to finish were associated with greater odds of requiring 5 or more attempts to pass the drill.

CONCLUSION

All OSATS metrics improved on an intestinal anastomosis drill after simulation training. A maximum of 6 attempts were required to achieve a passing score. Initial performance strongly predicts the number of attempts required to achieve a passing score. This feasible and effective drill provides trainees with robotic intestinal anastomosis training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信