通过改进的自适应 II 型渐进式删减计划分析倒 Lomax 模型的可靠性指标及其应用

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Complexity Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1155/2024/4848673
Refah Alotaibi, Mazen Nassar, Ahmed Elshahhat
{"title":"通过改进的自适应 II 型渐进式删减计划分析倒 Lomax 模型的可靠性指标及其应用","authors":"Refah Alotaibi,&nbsp;Mazen Nassar,&nbsp;Ahmed Elshahhat","doi":"10.1155/2024/4848673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Employing an improved adaptive Type-II progressively censored sample, this paper provides various point and interval estimations when the parent distribution of the population to be studied is the inverted Lomax distribution. The estimations include both the model parameters and two reliability metrics, namely, the reliability and failure rate functions. Both maximum likelihood and maximum product of spacing are studied from the conventional estimation standpoint. Along with the point estimations utilizing the two traditional approaches, the approximate confidence intervals based on both are also examined. The Bayesian point estimations with the squared error loss function and credible intervals for various parameters are investigated. Depending on the source of observed data, Bayesian estimations are obtained using two different types of posterior distributions. Numerous censoring designs are looked at in the simulation study to compare the accuracy of classical and Bayesian estimations. Using both conventional methodologies, several optimality metrics are suggested to identify the best removal design. One chemical and a pair of engineering actual data sets are examined to support the significance of the indicated methodologies. The analysis showed that the Bayesian estimation, using the likelihood function, is preferable when compared to other classical and Bayesian methods.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50653,"journal":{"name":"Complexity","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4848673","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Reliability Indicators for Inverted Lomax Model via Improved Adaptive Type-II Progressive Censoring Plan with Applications\",\"authors\":\"Refah Alotaibi,&nbsp;Mazen Nassar,&nbsp;Ahmed Elshahhat\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/4848673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Employing an improved adaptive Type-II progressively censored sample, this paper provides various point and interval estimations when the parent distribution of the population to be studied is the inverted Lomax distribution. The estimations include both the model parameters and two reliability metrics, namely, the reliability and failure rate functions. Both maximum likelihood and maximum product of spacing are studied from the conventional estimation standpoint. Along with the point estimations utilizing the two traditional approaches, the approximate confidence intervals based on both are also examined. The Bayesian point estimations with the squared error loss function and credible intervals for various parameters are investigated. Depending on the source of observed data, Bayesian estimations are obtained using two different types of posterior distributions. Numerous censoring designs are looked at in the simulation study to compare the accuracy of classical and Bayesian estimations. Using both conventional methodologies, several optimality metrics are suggested to identify the best removal design. One chemical and a pair of engineering actual data sets are examined to support the significance of the indicated methodologies. The analysis showed that the Bayesian estimation, using the likelihood function, is preferable when compared to other classical and Bayesian methods.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complexity\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4848673\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complexity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/4848673\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/4848673","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用改进的自适应 II 型逐步删减样本,在待研究群体的母分布为倒 Lomax 分布时,提供了各种点和区间估计。这些估计包括模型参数和两个可靠性指标,即可靠性和故障率函数。最大似然法和最大间距积法都是从传统估计的角度进行研究的。除了利用这两种传统方法进行点估算外,还研究了基于这两种方法的近似置信区间。还研究了使用平方误差损失函数的贝叶斯点估计以及各种参数的可信区间。根据观测数据的来源,使用两种不同类型的后验分布进行贝叶斯估计。在模拟研究中考察了许多删减设计,以比较经典估计和贝叶斯估计的准确性。利用这两种传统方法,提出了几种优化指标,以确定最佳的剔除设计。对一个化学数据集和一对工程实际数据集进行了研究,以支持所述方法的重要性。分析表明,与其他经典方法和贝叶斯方法相比,使用似然函数的贝叶斯估算方法更为可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Analysis of Reliability Indicators for Inverted Lomax Model via Improved Adaptive Type-II Progressive Censoring Plan with Applications

Analysis of Reliability Indicators for Inverted Lomax Model via Improved Adaptive Type-II Progressive Censoring Plan with Applications

Employing an improved adaptive Type-II progressively censored sample, this paper provides various point and interval estimations when the parent distribution of the population to be studied is the inverted Lomax distribution. The estimations include both the model parameters and two reliability metrics, namely, the reliability and failure rate functions. Both maximum likelihood and maximum product of spacing are studied from the conventional estimation standpoint. Along with the point estimations utilizing the two traditional approaches, the approximate confidence intervals based on both are also examined. The Bayesian point estimations with the squared error loss function and credible intervals for various parameters are investigated. Depending on the source of observed data, Bayesian estimations are obtained using two different types of posterior distributions. Numerous censoring designs are looked at in the simulation study to compare the accuracy of classical and Bayesian estimations. Using both conventional methodologies, several optimality metrics are suggested to identify the best removal design. One chemical and a pair of engineering actual data sets are examined to support the significance of the indicated methodologies. The analysis showed that the Bayesian estimation, using the likelihood function, is preferable when compared to other classical and Bayesian methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Complexity
Complexity 综合性期刊-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
595
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Complexity is a cross-disciplinary journal focusing on the rapidly expanding science of complex adaptive systems. The purpose of the journal is to advance the science of complexity. Articles may deal with such methodological themes as chaos, genetic algorithms, cellular automata, neural networks, and evolutionary game theory. Papers treating applications in any area of natural science or human endeavor are welcome, and especially encouraged are papers integrating conceptual themes and applications that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. Complexity is not meant to serve as a forum for speculation and vague analogies between words like “chaos,” “self-organization,” and “emergence” that are often used in completely different ways in science and in daily life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信