跨治理和粮食系统(Tr-GaF)促进粮食政策整合:澳大利亚粮食政策景观案例研究

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Lijun Summerhayes , Douglas Baker
{"title":"跨治理和粮食系统(Tr-GaF)促进粮食政策整合:澳大利亚粮食政策景观案例研究","authors":"Lijun Summerhayes ,&nbsp;Douglas Baker","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food policy integration is critical for sustainability as urban food policies become a new norm in the policy agenda. Yet, little research demonstrates how food policies are integrated with food systems and across governance to achieve urban sustainability.<!--> <!-->This paper presents the <strong><u>Tr</u></strong>ans-<strong><u>G</u></strong>overnance <u>a</u>nd <strong><u>F</u></strong>ood Systems (<em>Tr-GaF</em>) framework for food policy integration developed to evaluate the Australian food policy landscape. The analysis of 102 food-relevant policy documents sourced from multiple government institutions in Queensland, Western Australia, and Victoria identifies limited food policy integration in Australia, with little attention paid to food-related urban planning. Policy misalignments arise in the agrifood economy, health and well-being, and environment and ecology domains, with horizontal and vertical fragmentation across governance levels and sectors. Inadequate integration with food systems further jeopardises the efficiency of urban food supply chains and consumption activities. These three prominent issues collectively stifle urban sustainability by economically restraining food supply chain actors’ ability to innovate and compete. While environmental imbalance worsens, urbanites inevitably face barriers to maintaining health and social well-being. <em>Tr-GaF</em> provides an evidenced-based framework for policymakers to evaluate and integrate food policies anchored in food systems governed by collaborative multi-scalar government agencies, institutions, food industries, and civil society. In doing so, urban development can sustainably evolve economically, socially, and environmentally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 102736"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trans-Governance and Food Systems (Tr-GaF) for food policy integration: A case study of the Australian food policy landscape\",\"authors\":\"Lijun Summerhayes ,&nbsp;Douglas Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Food policy integration is critical for sustainability as urban food policies become a new norm in the policy agenda. Yet, little research demonstrates how food policies are integrated with food systems and across governance to achieve urban sustainability.<!--> <!-->This paper presents the <strong><u>Tr</u></strong>ans-<strong><u>G</u></strong>overnance <u>a</u>nd <strong><u>F</u></strong>ood Systems (<em>Tr-GaF</em>) framework for food policy integration developed to evaluate the Australian food policy landscape. The analysis of 102 food-relevant policy documents sourced from multiple government institutions in Queensland, Western Australia, and Victoria identifies limited food policy integration in Australia, with little attention paid to food-related urban planning. Policy misalignments arise in the agrifood economy, health and well-being, and environment and ecology domains, with horizontal and vertical fragmentation across governance levels and sectors. Inadequate integration with food systems further jeopardises the efficiency of urban food supply chains and consumption activities. These three prominent issues collectively stifle urban sustainability by economically restraining food supply chain actors’ ability to innovate and compete. While environmental imbalance worsens, urbanites inevitably face barriers to maintaining health and social well-being. <em>Tr-GaF</em> provides an evidenced-based framework for policymakers to evaluate and integrate food policies anchored in food systems governed by collaborative multi-scalar government agencies, institutions, food industries, and civil society. In doing so, urban development can sustainably evolve economically, socially, and environmentally.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Policy\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102736\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224001477\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224001477","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着城市粮食政策成为政策议程中的新规范,粮食政策整合对可持续性至关重要。然而,很少有研究表明粮食政策如何与粮食系统和跨治理相结合,以实现城市的可持续性。本文介绍了跨治理与粮食系统(Tr-GaF)粮食政策整合框架,该框架是为评估澳大利亚粮食政策状况而开发的。通过对来自昆士兰州、西澳大利亚州和维多利亚州多个政府机构的 102 份与食品相关的政策文件进行分析,发现澳大利亚的食品政策整合程度有限,与食品相关的城市规划很少受到关注。在农粮经济、健康与福利、环境与生态领域出现了政策错位,各治理层级和部门之间出现了横向和纵向的割裂。与粮食系统的整合不足进一步损害了城市粮食供应链和消费活动的效率。这三个突出问题在经济上限制了食品供应链参与者的创新和竞争能力,从而共同扼杀了城市的可持续发展。在环境失衡恶化的同时,城市居民在保持健康和社会福祉方面也不可避免地面临障碍。Tr-GaF 为政策制定者提供了一个以事实为基础的框架,用于评估和整合粮食政策,这些政策立足于由多级政府部门、机构、粮食行业和民间社会共同管理的粮食系统。这样,城市发展就能在经济、社会和环境方面实现可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trans-Governance and Food Systems (Tr-GaF) for food policy integration: A case study of the Australian food policy landscape
Food policy integration is critical for sustainability as urban food policies become a new norm in the policy agenda. Yet, little research demonstrates how food policies are integrated with food systems and across governance to achieve urban sustainability. This paper presents the Trans-Governance and Food Systems (Tr-GaF) framework for food policy integration developed to evaluate the Australian food policy landscape. The analysis of 102 food-relevant policy documents sourced from multiple government institutions in Queensland, Western Australia, and Victoria identifies limited food policy integration in Australia, with little attention paid to food-related urban planning. Policy misalignments arise in the agrifood economy, health and well-being, and environment and ecology domains, with horizontal and vertical fragmentation across governance levels and sectors. Inadequate integration with food systems further jeopardises the efficiency of urban food supply chains and consumption activities. These three prominent issues collectively stifle urban sustainability by economically restraining food supply chain actors’ ability to innovate and compete. While environmental imbalance worsens, urbanites inevitably face barriers to maintaining health and social well-being. Tr-GaF provides an evidenced-based framework for policymakers to evaluate and integrate food policies anchored in food systems governed by collaborative multi-scalar government agencies, institutions, food industries, and civil society. In doing so, urban development can sustainably evolve economically, socially, and environmentally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信