Roee Hayek, Itai Gutman, Guy Baranes, Yaniv Nudelman, Shmuel Springer
{"title":"基于智能手机的 \"坐立分析\"，用于评估中年人的行动能力。","authors":"Roee Hayek, Itai Gutman, Guy Baranes, Yaniv Nudelman, Shmuel Springer","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igae079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Mobility can decline in middle age and growing evidence highlights the importance of assessing mobility at this stage of life. Smartphone-based accelerometry during sit-to-stand has been shown to identify mobility impairments, but its utility in detecting subtle mobility deterioration in middle age has not been tested. This study aimed to examine whether smartphone-based accelerometry data measured during sit-to-stand tests performed on a regular chair and a cushioned sofa could be useful for detecting subtle changes in mobility in middle age.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Twenty-three young (25.0 ± 2.5 years), 25 middle-aged (52.0 ± 5.2 years), and 17 older adults (70.0 ± 4.1 years) performed the 5-times sit-to-stand test on both a standard chair and a sofa. A smartphone attached to the participants' lower back was used to measure lower-limb muscle power, maximal vertical velocity (MVV) during rising, the duration of the total task and the subphase of transition from sitting to standing (SiToSt), and repetition variability using the dynamic time warping method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Middle-aged adults had reduced lower-limb muscle power compared to young adults (5.25 ± 1.08 vs 6.19 ± 1.38 W/kg, <i>p</i> = .034), being more pronounced on the sofa (6.23 ± 1.61 vs 8.08 ± 2.17 W/kg, <i>p</i> = .004). Differences between middle-aged and young adults in terms of MVV (<i>p</i> = .011) and SiToSt duration (<i>p</i> = .038) were only detected on the sofa, and the middle-aged adults showed less variability compared to the older adults on the chair (<i>p</i> = .018). There was no difference in total task duration between the middle-aged group and the young or older adults in either condition.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Most common tests are limited in their ability to detect early mobility deterioration in midlife due to a ceiling effect. Our results, which show the potential of smartphone-based sit-to-stand assessment in detecting subtle mobility decline in midlife, could serve as a screening tool for this purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smartphone-Based Sit-to-Stand Analysis for Mobility Assessment in Middle Age.\",\"authors\":\"Roee Hayek, Itai Gutman, Guy Baranes, Yaniv Nudelman, Shmuel Springer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igae079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Mobility can decline in middle age and growing evidence highlights the importance of assessing mobility at this stage of life. Smartphone-based accelerometry during sit-to-stand has been shown to identify mobility impairments, but its utility in detecting subtle mobility deterioration in middle age has not been tested. This study aimed to examine whether smartphone-based accelerometry data measured during sit-to-stand tests performed on a regular chair and a cushioned sofa could be useful for detecting subtle changes in mobility in middle age.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Twenty-three young (25.0 ± 2.5 years), 25 middle-aged (52.0 ± 5.2 years), and 17 older adults (70.0 ± 4.1 years) performed the 5-times sit-to-stand test on both a standard chair and a sofa. A smartphone attached to the participants' lower back was used to measure lower-limb muscle power, maximal vertical velocity (MVV) during rising, the duration of the total task and the subphase of transition from sitting to standing (SiToSt), and repetition variability using the dynamic time warping method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Middle-aged adults had reduced lower-limb muscle power compared to young adults (5.25 ± 1.08 vs 6.19 ± 1.38 W/kg, <i>p</i> = .034), being more pronounced on the sofa (6.23 ± 1.61 vs 8.08 ± 2.17 W/kg, <i>p</i> = .004). Differences between middle-aged and young adults in terms of MVV (<i>p</i> = .011) and SiToSt duration (<i>p</i> = .038) were only detected on the sofa, and the middle-aged adults showed less variability compared to the older adults on the chair (<i>p</i> = .018). There was no difference in total task duration between the middle-aged group and the young or older adults in either condition.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Most common tests are limited in their ability to detect early mobility deterioration in midlife due to a ceiling effect. Our results, which show the potential of smartphone-based sit-to-stand assessment in detecting subtle mobility decline in midlife, could serve as a screening tool for this purpose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465189/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae079\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Smartphone-Based Sit-to-Stand Analysis for Mobility Assessment in Middle Age.
Background and objectives: Mobility can decline in middle age and growing evidence highlights the importance of assessing mobility at this stage of life. Smartphone-based accelerometry during sit-to-stand has been shown to identify mobility impairments, but its utility in detecting subtle mobility deterioration in middle age has not been tested. This study aimed to examine whether smartphone-based accelerometry data measured during sit-to-stand tests performed on a regular chair and a cushioned sofa could be useful for detecting subtle changes in mobility in middle age.
Research design and methods: Twenty-three young (25.0 ± 2.5 years), 25 middle-aged (52.0 ± 5.2 years), and 17 older adults (70.0 ± 4.1 years) performed the 5-times sit-to-stand test on both a standard chair and a sofa. A smartphone attached to the participants' lower back was used to measure lower-limb muscle power, maximal vertical velocity (MVV) during rising, the duration of the total task and the subphase of transition from sitting to standing (SiToSt), and repetition variability using the dynamic time warping method.
Results: Middle-aged adults had reduced lower-limb muscle power compared to young adults (5.25 ± 1.08 vs 6.19 ± 1.38 W/kg, p = .034), being more pronounced on the sofa (6.23 ± 1.61 vs 8.08 ± 2.17 W/kg, p = .004). Differences between middle-aged and young adults in terms of MVV (p = .011) and SiToSt duration (p = .038) were only detected on the sofa, and the middle-aged adults showed less variability compared to the older adults on the chair (p = .018). There was no difference in total task duration between the middle-aged group and the young or older adults in either condition.
Discussion and implications: Most common tests are limited in their ability to detect early mobility deterioration in midlife due to a ceiling effect. Our results, which show the potential of smartphone-based sit-to-stand assessment in detecting subtle mobility decline in midlife, could serve as a screening tool for this purpose.
期刊介绍：
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
