普通外科住院医师培训中的伦理方法:混合学习模块试验。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Ali Kagan Coskun MD, PhD , Irem Budakoglu MD, MSc , Ozlem Coskun MD, PhD , Canan Uluoglu MD, PhD
{"title":"普通外科住院医师培训中的伦理方法:混合学习模块试验。","authors":"Ali Kagan Coskun MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Irem Budakoglu MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Ozlem Coskun MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Canan Uluoglu MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>AIM</h3><div>This study aimed to develop a blended training module focusing on ethical approaches within general surgery residency training and to assess the impact of this training on participants.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Based on the literature review and input from both general surgery residents and trainers, 14 topics were identified, and corresponding learning objectives were formulated. The training was conducted through a blended learning module, which encompassed online video presentations alongside face-to-face sessions involving real-life cases. Assessment of the training involved administering test-formatted exams both before and after the training, which assessed the learning objectives of the 14 topics. These exams comprised multiple-choice questions and true/false inquiries based on case-based propositions. Additionally, feedback regarding the training was solicited from the residents.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>The study involved 20 general surgery residents. Assessment revealed a statistically significant increase in exam success among the residents after the training (p&lt;0.001). Additionally, feedback indicated that the training model was effective.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Developing a blended learning module that combines online and face-to-face education, supplemented with real-life case studies, and incorporating discussions on ethical dilemmas during face-to-face sessions, along with assessment through exams, will significantly enhance the proficiency of residents in surgical ethics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"81 12","pages":"Article 103291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical Approaches in General Surgery Residency Training: A Blended Learning Module Trial\",\"authors\":\"Ali Kagan Coskun MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Irem Budakoglu MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Ozlem Coskun MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Canan Uluoglu MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.09.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>AIM</h3><div>This study aimed to develop a blended training module focusing on ethical approaches within general surgery residency training and to assess the impact of this training on participants.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Based on the literature review and input from both general surgery residents and trainers, 14 topics were identified, and corresponding learning objectives were formulated. The training was conducted through a blended learning module, which encompassed online video presentations alongside face-to-face sessions involving real-life cases. Assessment of the training involved administering test-formatted exams both before and after the training, which assessed the learning objectives of the 14 topics. These exams comprised multiple-choice questions and true/false inquiries based on case-based propositions. Additionally, feedback regarding the training was solicited from the residents.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>The study involved 20 general surgery residents. Assessment revealed a statistically significant increase in exam success among the residents after the training (p&lt;0.001). Additionally, feedback indicated that the training model was effective.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Developing a blended learning module that combines online and face-to-face education, supplemented with real-life case studies, and incorporating discussions on ethical dilemmas during face-to-face sessions, along with assessment through exams, will significantly enhance the proficiency of residents in surgical ethics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":\"81 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 103291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193172042400429X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193172042400429X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在开发一个混合培训模块,重点是普外科住院医师培训中的伦理方法,并评估该培训对学员的影响:根据文献综述以及普外科住院医师和培训师的意见,确定了 14 个主题,并制定了相应的学习目标。培训通过混合学习模块进行,包括在线视频演示和涉及真实病例的面对面课程。培训评估包括在培训前后进行测试形式的考试,对 14 个主题的学习目标进行评估。这些考试包括基于案例命题的多项选择题和真/假问题。此外,还征求了住院医师对培训的反馈意见:研究涉及 20 名普外科住院医师。评估显示,经过培训后,住院医师的考试成功率有了统计学意义上的显著提高(p结论:开发一个混合学习模块,将在线教育和面对面教育结合起来,辅以真实案例研究,并在面对面课程中纳入伦理困境讨论,同时通过考试进行评估,这将显著提高住院医师在外科伦理学方面的熟练程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical Approaches in General Surgery Residency Training: A Blended Learning Module Trial

AIM

This study aimed to develop a blended training module focusing on ethical approaches within general surgery residency training and to assess the impact of this training on participants.

METHODS

Based on the literature review and input from both general surgery residents and trainers, 14 topics were identified, and corresponding learning objectives were formulated. The training was conducted through a blended learning module, which encompassed online video presentations alongside face-to-face sessions involving real-life cases. Assessment of the training involved administering test-formatted exams both before and after the training, which assessed the learning objectives of the 14 topics. These exams comprised multiple-choice questions and true/false inquiries based on case-based propositions. Additionally, feedback regarding the training was solicited from the residents.

RESULTS

The study involved 20 general surgery residents. Assessment revealed a statistically significant increase in exam success among the residents after the training (p<0.001). Additionally, feedback indicated that the training model was effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Developing a blended learning module that combines online and face-to-face education, supplemented with real-life case studies, and incorporating discussions on ethical dilemmas during face-to-face sessions, along with assessment through exams, will significantly enhance the proficiency of residents in surgical ethics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信