新生儿术前局部防腐:评估皮肤损伤风险因素的系统性综述。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Carly Mulinda, Sana Suhail, Bronwyn Sutherland, Christine T Lauren, Raegan D Hunt
{"title":"新生儿术前局部防腐:评估皮肤损伤风险因素的系统性综述。","authors":"Carly Mulinda, Sana Suhail, Bronwyn Sutherland, Christine T Lauren, Raegan D Hunt","doi":"10.1111/pde.15773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pre-procedural antisepsis is a critical component of hospital-acquired infection prevention in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). However, broadly utilized topical antiseptic agents pose an elevated risk of disruption to neonatal skin integrity, and evidence-based guidelines are lacking. This systematic review of the literature sought to assess and characterize the predisposing risk factors for and types of neonatal skin injury from topical antiseptic agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of Medline Ovid, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library was conducted, including academic literature providing data on neonatal skin injuries related to topical antisepsis in the NICU.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 articles (99 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Of the available data, most reported skin injuries were described in extremely preterm (98.1%) and very low birth weight (98.4%) infants. The majority of reported adverse cutaneous events were attributed to chlorhexidine preparations (74.8%), followed by octenidine (18.2%), povidone-iodine (6.1%), and isopropyl alcohol (2.0%). Erythema (40.1%), skin breakdown (23.4%), and chemical burns (17.5%) were the skin reactions reported most frequently, followed by skin irritation (8.3%), and skin necrosis (2.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that both extremely preterm and very low birth weight infants are particularly susceptible to skin toxicities from pre-procedural antiseptic preparations. These data underscore the need for future research to support the development of guidelines which minimize iatrogenic cutaneous injuries in the neonatal population, specifically for the care of infants under 2 months of age, for whom current recommendations are lacking due to a paucity of data.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-procedural Topical Antisepsis in the Neonate: A Systematic Review Evaluating Risk Factors for Skin Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Carly Mulinda, Sana Suhail, Bronwyn Sutherland, Christine T Lauren, Raegan D Hunt\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pde.15773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pre-procedural antisepsis is a critical component of hospital-acquired infection prevention in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). However, broadly utilized topical antiseptic agents pose an elevated risk of disruption to neonatal skin integrity, and evidence-based guidelines are lacking. This systematic review of the literature sought to assess and characterize the predisposing risk factors for and types of neonatal skin injury from topical antiseptic agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of Medline Ovid, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library was conducted, including academic literature providing data on neonatal skin injuries related to topical antisepsis in the NICU.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 articles (99 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Of the available data, most reported skin injuries were described in extremely preterm (98.1%) and very low birth weight (98.4%) infants. The majority of reported adverse cutaneous events were attributed to chlorhexidine preparations (74.8%), followed by octenidine (18.2%), povidone-iodine (6.1%), and isopropyl alcohol (2.0%). Erythema (40.1%), skin breakdown (23.4%), and chemical burns (17.5%) were the skin reactions reported most frequently, followed by skin irritation (8.3%), and skin necrosis (2.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that both extremely preterm and very low birth weight infants are particularly susceptible to skin toxicities from pre-procedural antiseptic preparations. These data underscore the need for future research to support the development of guidelines which minimize iatrogenic cutaneous injuries in the neonatal population, specifically for the care of infants under 2 months of age, for whom current recommendations are lacking due to a paucity of data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.15773\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.15773","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手术前消毒是新生儿重症监护室(NICU)预防院内感染的关键环节。然而,广泛使用的局部杀菌剂会增加破坏新生儿皮肤完整性的风险,而且缺乏循证指南。本系统性文献综述旨在评估和描述局部杀菌剂导致新生儿皮肤损伤的诱发风险因素和类型:方法:对 Medline Ovid、Embase、Web of Science、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了系统性检索,包括提供与新生儿重症监护室局部消毒相关的新生儿皮肤损伤数据的学术文献:共有 19 篇文章(99 名患者)符合纳入标准。在现有数据中,大多数报告的皮肤损伤发生在极早产儿(98.1%)和极低出生体重儿(98.4%)身上。大多数报告的皮肤不良事件是由洗必泰制剂引起的(74.8%),其次是辛烯胺(18.2%)、聚维酮碘(6.1%)和异丙醇(2.0%)。红斑(40.1%)、皮肤破损(23.4%)和化学灼伤(17.5%)是最常见的皮肤反应,其次是皮肤刺激(8.3%)和皮肤坏死(2.8%):我们的研究结果表明,极早产儿和出生体重极轻的婴儿特别容易受到术前消毒制剂的皮肤毒性影响。这些数据强调了未来研究的必要性,以支持最大限度减少新生儿先天性皮肤损伤的指南的制定,特别是针对 2 个月以下婴儿的护理,由于数据匮乏,目前还没有针对这些婴儿的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pre-procedural Topical Antisepsis in the Neonate: A Systematic Review Evaluating Risk Factors for Skin Injury.

Background: Pre-procedural antisepsis is a critical component of hospital-acquired infection prevention in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). However, broadly utilized topical antiseptic agents pose an elevated risk of disruption to neonatal skin integrity, and evidence-based guidelines are lacking. This systematic review of the literature sought to assess and characterize the predisposing risk factors for and types of neonatal skin injury from topical antiseptic agents.

Methods: A systematic search of Medline Ovid, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library was conducted, including academic literature providing data on neonatal skin injuries related to topical antisepsis in the NICU.

Results: A total of 19 articles (99 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Of the available data, most reported skin injuries were described in extremely preterm (98.1%) and very low birth weight (98.4%) infants. The majority of reported adverse cutaneous events were attributed to chlorhexidine preparations (74.8%), followed by octenidine (18.2%), povidone-iodine (6.1%), and isopropyl alcohol (2.0%). Erythema (40.1%), skin breakdown (23.4%), and chemical burns (17.5%) were the skin reactions reported most frequently, followed by skin irritation (8.3%), and skin necrosis (2.8%).

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that both extremely preterm and very low birth weight infants are particularly susceptible to skin toxicities from pre-procedural antiseptic preparations. These data underscore the need for future research to support the development of guidelines which minimize iatrogenic cutaneous injuries in the neonatal population, specifically for the care of infants under 2 months of age, for whom current recommendations are lacking due to a paucity of data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信