术中住院医师同伴辅导计划中使用的自我评估和辅导技术。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Stefanie J. Soelling MD, MPH , Lily V. Saadat MD , Joshua S. Jolissaint MD, MSc , Emily Cummins PhD , Stephanie L. Nitzschke MD , Douglas S. Smink MD, MPH
{"title":"术中住院医师同伴辅导计划中使用的自我评估和辅导技术。","authors":"Stefanie J. Soelling MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Lily V. Saadat MD ,&nbsp;Joshua S. Jolissaint MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Emily Cummins PhD ,&nbsp;Stephanie L. Nitzschke MD ,&nbsp;Douglas S. Smink MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate junior resident self-assessments and utilization of effective coaching principles by chief resident coaches in a resident peer surgical coaching program.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>All residents underwent the Surgical Coaching for Operative Performance Enhancement (SCOPE) coaching curriculum. Junior residents (“coachees”) were paired with chief resident coaches. A case was selected for coaching. The coaching structure was: 1) junior resident preoperative goal setting, 2) unscrubbed, intraoperative case observation by the coach, 3) postoperative coaching debrief. Debriefs were recorded to determine frequency of junior resident self-assessment and use of the effective coaching principles (goal setting, collaborative analysis, constructive feedback, action planning). Deductive thematic analysis was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>A general surgery residency at a single, large academic medical center.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>16 junior resident (PGY1-3) coachees and 6 chief resident (PGY5) coaches.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 18 recorded coaching debrief sessions that lasted an average of 12.65 minutes (range 4-31 minutes). All debrief sessions included self-assessments by the junior resident coachees. There were numerous examples of the 4 effective coaching principles with all debriefs including use of at least 3. The most commonly used were collaborative analysis and constructive feedback. For technical skills, these highlighted body positioning, needle angles, and dissection techniques, including instrument choice, laparoscopic instrument technique, and use of electrocautery. Collaborative analysis of nontechnical skills emphasized communication with the attending surgeon, specifically operative decision-making and advocating for resident autonomy. Nontechnical constructive feedback addressed strategies the coaches themselves used for managing stress, interacting with attendings, and excelling in the operating room.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Self-assessments and use of effective coaching principles were frequent throughout peer coaching debriefs. Collaborative analysis and constructive feedback were employed to promote operative technical and nontechnical skill development. Within a peer coaching program, residents are able to employ high level teaching and coaching techniques to encourage operative performance enhancement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"81 12","pages":"Article 103285"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-Assessment and Coaching Techniques Utilized in an Intraoperative Resident Peer Coaching Program\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie J. Soelling MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Lily V. Saadat MD ,&nbsp;Joshua S. Jolissaint MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Emily Cummins PhD ,&nbsp;Stephanie L. Nitzschke MD ,&nbsp;Douglas S. Smink MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate junior resident self-assessments and utilization of effective coaching principles by chief resident coaches in a resident peer surgical coaching program.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>All residents underwent the Surgical Coaching for Operative Performance Enhancement (SCOPE) coaching curriculum. Junior residents (“coachees”) were paired with chief resident coaches. A case was selected for coaching. The coaching structure was: 1) junior resident preoperative goal setting, 2) unscrubbed, intraoperative case observation by the coach, 3) postoperative coaching debrief. Debriefs were recorded to determine frequency of junior resident self-assessment and use of the effective coaching principles (goal setting, collaborative analysis, constructive feedback, action planning). Deductive thematic analysis was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>A general surgery residency at a single, large academic medical center.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>16 junior resident (PGY1-3) coachees and 6 chief resident (PGY5) coaches.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 18 recorded coaching debrief sessions that lasted an average of 12.65 minutes (range 4-31 minutes). All debrief sessions included self-assessments by the junior resident coachees. There were numerous examples of the 4 effective coaching principles with all debriefs including use of at least 3. The most commonly used were collaborative analysis and constructive feedback. For technical skills, these highlighted body positioning, needle angles, and dissection techniques, including instrument choice, laparoscopic instrument technique, and use of electrocautery. Collaborative analysis of nontechnical skills emphasized communication with the attending surgeon, specifically operative decision-making and advocating for resident autonomy. Nontechnical constructive feedback addressed strategies the coaches themselves used for managing stress, interacting with attendings, and excelling in the operating room.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Self-assessments and use of effective coaching principles were frequent throughout peer coaching debriefs. Collaborative analysis and constructive feedback were employed to promote operative technical and nontechnical skill development. Within a peer coaching program, residents are able to employ high level teaching and coaching techniques to encourage operative performance enhancement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":\"81 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 103285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004227\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估初级住院医师的自我评估以及住院总医师在住院医师同伴手术指导项目中对有效指导原则的运用情况:设计:所有住院医师都接受了 "提高手术表现的外科教练"(SCOPE)教练课程。初级住院医师("教练")与总住院医师教练配对。教练选择一个病例。教练结构为:1)初级住院医师术前目标设定;2)教练对术中病例进行无擦拭观察;3)术后教练汇报。对汇报进行记录,以确定初级住院医师自我评估的频率以及有效指导原则(目标设定、合作分析、建设性反馈、行动规划)的使用情况。进行了演绎主题分析:参与者:16 名初级住院医师(PGY1-3):16 名初级住院医师(PGY1-3)教练和 6 名总住院医师(PGY5)教练:结果:共记录了 18 次辅导汇报,平均持续 12.65 分钟(4-31 分钟不等)。所有汇报环节都包括初级住院医师教练的自我评估。在所有汇报中,至少使用了 3 项有效的 4 项教练原则,其中最常用的是合作分析和建设性反馈。在技术技能方面,这些原则强调了身体定位、针角度和解剖技术,包括器械选择、腹腔镜器械技术和电烧的使用。非技术性技能的合作分析强调与主治医生的沟通,特别是手术决策和倡导住院医师的自主性。非技术性的建设性反馈则涉及到指导者自身在管理压力、与主治医生互动以及在手术室中取得优异成绩时所采用的策略:结论:自我评估和有效指导原则的使用在同行指导汇报中经常出现。协作分析和建设性反馈被用来促进手术技术和非技术技能的发展。在同伴指导计划中,住院医师能够运用高水平的教学和指导技术来鼓励提高手术表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-Assessment and Coaching Techniques Utilized in an Intraoperative Resident Peer Coaching Program

Objectives

To evaluate junior resident self-assessments and utilization of effective coaching principles by chief resident coaches in a resident peer surgical coaching program.

Design

All residents underwent the Surgical Coaching for Operative Performance Enhancement (SCOPE) coaching curriculum. Junior residents (“coachees”) were paired with chief resident coaches. A case was selected for coaching. The coaching structure was: 1) junior resident preoperative goal setting, 2) unscrubbed, intraoperative case observation by the coach, 3) postoperative coaching debrief. Debriefs were recorded to determine frequency of junior resident self-assessment and use of the effective coaching principles (goal setting, collaborative analysis, constructive feedback, action planning). Deductive thematic analysis was conducted.

Setting

A general surgery residency at a single, large academic medical center.

Participants

16 junior resident (PGY1-3) coachees and 6 chief resident (PGY5) coaches.

Results

There were 18 recorded coaching debrief sessions that lasted an average of 12.65 minutes (range 4-31 minutes). All debrief sessions included self-assessments by the junior resident coachees. There were numerous examples of the 4 effective coaching principles with all debriefs including use of at least 3. The most commonly used were collaborative analysis and constructive feedback. For technical skills, these highlighted body positioning, needle angles, and dissection techniques, including instrument choice, laparoscopic instrument technique, and use of electrocautery. Collaborative analysis of nontechnical skills emphasized communication with the attending surgeon, specifically operative decision-making and advocating for resident autonomy. Nontechnical constructive feedback addressed strategies the coaches themselves used for managing stress, interacting with attendings, and excelling in the operating room.

Conclusions

Self-assessments and use of effective coaching principles were frequent throughout peer coaching debriefs. Collaborative analysis and constructive feedback were employed to promote operative technical and nontechnical skill development. Within a peer coaching program, residents are able to employ high level teaching and coaching techniques to encourage operative performance enhancement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信