Laurie Georgel, Anas-Alexis Benyoussef, Sofian Berrouiguet, Dewi Guellec, Guillermo Carvajal Alegria, Thierry Marhadour, Sandrine Jousse-Joulin, Béatrice Cochener-Lamard, Marc Labetoulle, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg, Tristan Bourcier, Gaétane Nocturne, Alain Saraux, Xavier Mariette, Maëlys Consigny, Michel Gravey, Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec, Raphaele Seror, Divi Cornec
{"title":"开发一种基于网络的生态瞬间评估工具,用于测量斯约格伦病患者症状的日常变化。","authors":"Laurie Georgel, Anas-Alexis Benyoussef, Sofian Berrouiguet, Dewi Guellec, Guillermo Carvajal Alegria, Thierry Marhadour, Sandrine Jousse-Joulin, Béatrice Cochener-Lamard, Marc Labetoulle, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg, Tristan Bourcier, Gaétane Nocturne, Alain Saraux, Xavier Mariette, Maëlys Consigny, Michel Gravey, Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec, Raphaele Seror, Divi Cornec","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a web-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) tool to enhance symptoms monitoring among patients with Sjögren's disease (SjD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive adults with SjD were enrolled in this pilot observational study. Participants used the WebApp over a 3-month period, for the daily collection of individual EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) scales and separate assessment of eyes and mouth dryness, using 0-10 numerical scales. Primary outcome was the measure of the interdaily variability of symptoms. Data collected through the WebApp were compared with those obtained with paper-based questionnaires administered during a final visit, using distinct approaches (predicted error, maximum negative error and maximum positive error). User experience was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 45 participants, 41 (91.1%) were women. Median age was 57 years (IQR: 49-66). Daily variability of symptoms ranged between 0.5 and 0.8 points across the scales. Over the 3-month period, the predicted error ranged between -1.2 and -0.3 points of the numerical scales. The greatest differences were found for fatigue (-1.2 points (IQR: -2.3 to -0.2)) and ESSPRI score (-1.2 points (IQR: -1.7 to -0.3)). Over the last 2 weeks, the predicted error ranged between - 1.2 and 0.0 points. Maximum negative error ranged between -2.0 and -1.0 points, and maximum positive error between -0.3 and 0.0 points. Median SUS score was 90 (IQR: 85-95).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrate the usability and the relevance of our web-based EMA tool for capturing data that closely reflects daily experiences of patients with SjD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a web-based ecological momentary assessment tool to measure day-to-day variability of the symptoms in patients with Sjögren's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Laurie Georgel, Anas-Alexis Benyoussef, Sofian Berrouiguet, Dewi Guellec, Guillermo Carvajal Alegria, Thierry Marhadour, Sandrine Jousse-Joulin, Béatrice Cochener-Lamard, Marc Labetoulle, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg, Tristan Bourcier, Gaétane Nocturne, Alain Saraux, Xavier Mariette, Maëlys Consigny, Michel Gravey, Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec, Raphaele Seror, Divi Cornec\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a web-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) tool to enhance symptoms monitoring among patients with Sjögren's disease (SjD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive adults with SjD were enrolled in this pilot observational study. Participants used the WebApp over a 3-month period, for the daily collection of individual EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) scales and separate assessment of eyes and mouth dryness, using 0-10 numerical scales. Primary outcome was the measure of the interdaily variability of symptoms. Data collected through the WebApp were compared with those obtained with paper-based questionnaires administered during a final visit, using distinct approaches (predicted error, maximum negative error and maximum positive error). User experience was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 45 participants, 41 (91.1%) were women. Median age was 57 years (IQR: 49-66). Daily variability of symptoms ranged between 0.5 and 0.8 points across the scales. Over the 3-month period, the predicted error ranged between -1.2 and -0.3 points of the numerical scales. The greatest differences were found for fatigue (-1.2 points (IQR: -2.3 to -0.2)) and ESSPRI score (-1.2 points (IQR: -1.7 to -0.3)). Over the last 2 weeks, the predicted error ranged between - 1.2 and 0.0 points. Maximum negative error ranged between -2.0 and -1.0 points, and maximum positive error between -0.3 and 0.0 points. Median SUS score was 90 (IQR: 85-95).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrate the usability and the relevance of our web-based EMA tool for capturing data that closely reflects daily experiences of patients with SjD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RMD Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448184/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RMD Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004526\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of a web-based ecological momentary assessment tool to measure day-to-day variability of the symptoms in patients with Sjögren's disease.
Objectives: To develop and validate a web-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) tool to enhance symptoms monitoring among patients with Sjögren's disease (SjD).
Methods: Consecutive adults with SjD were enrolled in this pilot observational study. Participants used the WebApp over a 3-month period, for the daily collection of individual EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) scales and separate assessment of eyes and mouth dryness, using 0-10 numerical scales. Primary outcome was the measure of the interdaily variability of symptoms. Data collected through the WebApp were compared with those obtained with paper-based questionnaires administered during a final visit, using distinct approaches (predicted error, maximum negative error and maximum positive error). User experience was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS) score.
Results: Among the 45 participants, 41 (91.1%) were women. Median age was 57 years (IQR: 49-66). Daily variability of symptoms ranged between 0.5 and 0.8 points across the scales. Over the 3-month period, the predicted error ranged between -1.2 and -0.3 points of the numerical scales. The greatest differences were found for fatigue (-1.2 points (IQR: -2.3 to -0.2)) and ESSPRI score (-1.2 points (IQR: -1.7 to -0.3)). Over the last 2 weeks, the predicted error ranged between - 1.2 and 0.0 points. Maximum negative error ranged between -2.0 and -1.0 points, and maximum positive error between -0.3 and 0.0 points. Median SUS score was 90 (IQR: 85-95).
Conclusion: Our results demonstrate the usability and the relevance of our web-based EMA tool for capturing data that closely reflects daily experiences of patients with SjD.
期刊介绍:
RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.