开发一种基于网络的生态瞬间评估工具,用于测量斯约格伦病患者症状的日常变化。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Laurie Georgel, Anas-Alexis Benyoussef, Sofian Berrouiguet, Dewi Guellec, Guillermo Carvajal Alegria, Thierry Marhadour, Sandrine Jousse-Joulin, Béatrice Cochener-Lamard, Marc Labetoulle, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg, Tristan Bourcier, Gaétane Nocturne, Alain Saraux, Xavier Mariette, Maëlys Consigny, Michel Gravey, Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec, Raphaele Seror, Divi Cornec
{"title":"开发一种基于网络的生态瞬间评估工具,用于测量斯约格伦病患者症状的日常变化。","authors":"Laurie Georgel, Anas-Alexis Benyoussef, Sofian Berrouiguet, Dewi Guellec, Guillermo Carvajal Alegria, Thierry Marhadour, Sandrine Jousse-Joulin, Béatrice Cochener-Lamard, Marc Labetoulle, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg, Tristan Bourcier, Gaétane Nocturne, Alain Saraux, Xavier Mariette, Maëlys Consigny, Michel Gravey, Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec, Raphaele Seror, Divi Cornec","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a web-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) tool to enhance symptoms monitoring among patients with Sjögren's disease (SjD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive adults with SjD were enrolled in this pilot observational study. Participants used the WebApp over a 3-month period, for the daily collection of individual EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) scales and separate assessment of eyes and mouth dryness, using 0-10 numerical scales. Primary outcome was the measure of the interdaily variability of symptoms. Data collected through the WebApp were compared with those obtained with paper-based questionnaires administered during a final visit, using distinct approaches (predicted error, maximum negative error and maximum positive error). User experience was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 45 participants, 41 (91.1%) were women. Median age was 57 years (IQR: 49-66). Daily variability of symptoms ranged between 0.5 and 0.8 points across the scales. Over the 3-month period, the predicted error ranged between -1.2 and -0.3 points of the numerical scales. The greatest differences were found for fatigue (-1.2 points (IQR: -2.3 to -0.2)) and ESSPRI score (-1.2 points (IQR: -1.7 to -0.3)). Over the last 2 weeks, the predicted error ranged between - 1.2 and 0.0 points. Maximum negative error ranged between -2.0 and -1.0 points, and maximum positive error between -0.3 and 0.0 points. Median SUS score was 90 (IQR: 85-95).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrate the usability and the relevance of our web-based EMA tool for capturing data that closely reflects daily experiences of patients with SjD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a web-based ecological momentary assessment tool to measure day-to-day variability of the symptoms in patients with Sjögren's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Laurie Georgel, Anas-Alexis Benyoussef, Sofian Berrouiguet, Dewi Guellec, Guillermo Carvajal Alegria, Thierry Marhadour, Sandrine Jousse-Joulin, Béatrice Cochener-Lamard, Marc Labetoulle, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg, Tristan Bourcier, Gaétane Nocturne, Alain Saraux, Xavier Mariette, Maëlys Consigny, Michel Gravey, Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec, Raphaele Seror, Divi Cornec\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a web-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) tool to enhance symptoms monitoring among patients with Sjögren's disease (SjD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive adults with SjD were enrolled in this pilot observational study. Participants used the WebApp over a 3-month period, for the daily collection of individual EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) scales and separate assessment of eyes and mouth dryness, using 0-10 numerical scales. Primary outcome was the measure of the interdaily variability of symptoms. Data collected through the WebApp were compared with those obtained with paper-based questionnaires administered during a final visit, using distinct approaches (predicted error, maximum negative error and maximum positive error). User experience was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 45 participants, 41 (91.1%) were women. Median age was 57 years (IQR: 49-66). Daily variability of symptoms ranged between 0.5 and 0.8 points across the scales. Over the 3-month period, the predicted error ranged between -1.2 and -0.3 points of the numerical scales. The greatest differences were found for fatigue (-1.2 points (IQR: -2.3 to -0.2)) and ESSPRI score (-1.2 points (IQR: -1.7 to -0.3)). Over the last 2 weeks, the predicted error ranged between - 1.2 and 0.0 points. Maximum negative error ranged between -2.0 and -1.0 points, and maximum positive error between -0.3 and 0.0 points. Median SUS score was 90 (IQR: 85-95).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrate the usability and the relevance of our web-based EMA tool for capturing data that closely reflects daily experiences of patients with SjD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RMD Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448184/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RMD Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004526\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开发并验证一种基于网络的生态瞬间评估(EMA)工具,以加强对斯尤格林病患者症状的监测:开发并验证基于网络的生态瞬间评估(EMA)工具,以加强对斯约格伦病(SjD)患者症状的监测:方法:连续招募成年 SjD 患者参与这项试点观察研究。参与者在 3 个月的时间内使用该网络应用程序,每天收集个人 EULAR Sjögren's 综合征患者报告指数 (ESSPRI) 量表,并使用 0-10 数字量表分别评估眼睛和口腔干燥情况。主要结果是测量症状的日间变异性。采用不同的方法(预测误差、最大负误差和最大正误差),将通过 WebApp 收集的数据与最后一次就诊时使用纸质问卷调查获得的数据进行比较。用户体验采用系统可用性量表(SUS)评分进行评估:在 45 位参与者中,41 位(91.1%)为女性。年龄中位数为 57 岁(IQR:49-66)。各量表的每日症状变化范围在 0.5 至 0.8 分之间。在 3 个月的时间里,数字量表的预测误差介于-1.2 和-0.3 点之间。差异最大的是疲劳(-1.2 分(IQR:-2.3 至 -0.2))和 ESSPRI 分数(-1.2 分(IQR:-1.7 至 -0.3))。在过去两周中,预测误差在-1.2 到 0.0 分之间。最大负误差在-2.0 到-1.0 分之间,最大正误差在-0.3 到 0.0 分之间。SUS 评分中位数为 90(IQR:85-95):我们的研究结果表明,我们基于网络的 EMA 工具在采集数据方面具有可用性和相关性,能够密切反映 SjD 患者的日常经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a web-based ecological momentary assessment tool to measure day-to-day variability of the symptoms in patients with Sjögren's disease.

Objectives: To develop and validate a web-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) tool to enhance symptoms monitoring among patients with Sjögren's disease (SjD).

Methods: Consecutive adults with SjD were enrolled in this pilot observational study. Participants used the WebApp over a 3-month period, for the daily collection of individual EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) scales and separate assessment of eyes and mouth dryness, using 0-10 numerical scales. Primary outcome was the measure of the interdaily variability of symptoms. Data collected through the WebApp were compared with those obtained with paper-based questionnaires administered during a final visit, using distinct approaches (predicted error, maximum negative error and maximum positive error). User experience was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS) score.

Results: Among the 45 participants, 41 (91.1%) were women. Median age was 57 years (IQR: 49-66). Daily variability of symptoms ranged between 0.5 and 0.8 points across the scales. Over the 3-month period, the predicted error ranged between -1.2 and -0.3 points of the numerical scales. The greatest differences were found for fatigue (-1.2 points (IQR: -2.3 to -0.2)) and ESSPRI score (-1.2 points (IQR: -1.7 to -0.3)). Over the last 2 weeks, the predicted error ranged between - 1.2 and 0.0 points. Maximum negative error ranged between -2.0 and -1.0 points, and maximum positive error between -0.3 and 0.0 points. Median SUS score was 90 (IQR: 85-95).

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate the usability and the relevance of our web-based EMA tool for capturing data that closely reflects daily experiences of patients with SjD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RMD Open
RMD Open RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
205
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信