超声引导下通过不同方法进行腕横韧带松解术治疗腕管综合征的比较:前瞻性随机对照试验。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-09-01
Xiaochen Shi, Jiaan Zhu, Guicheng Li, Xuesong Gu, Hailin Xu
{"title":"超声引导下通过不同方法进行腕横韧带松解术治疗腕管综合征的比较:前瞻性随机对照试验。","authors":"Xiaochen Shi, Jiaan Zhu, Guicheng Li, Xuesong Gu, Hailin Xu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound-guided transverse carpal ligament (TCL) needle release has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, no existing evidence has investigated the comparative efficacy of different release approaches.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided TCL needle release via different approaches for patients with mild to moderate CTS over a 12-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient clinic at a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-four patients with mild to moderate CTS (> 3 months' duration) were randomly assigned to either the long-axis group (one session of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection plus long-axis TCL needle release) or the short-axis group (one session of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection plus short-axis TCL needle release) in a one-to-one ratio. The primary outcomes were the symptom severity scale (SSS) and functional severity scale (FSS) scores of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ). The secondary outcomes were electrophysiological studies, including distal motor latency (DML) and sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve (MN), and patient-reported successful clinical response. Assessments were performed before treatment and at one, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 patients (30 per group) completed the trial. Compared to the baseline, both groups exhibited improvement in SSS, FSS, SNCV, DML, and CSA at all follow-up time points, with statistical differences for SSS, FSS, and SNCV at 3, 6, and 12 months (P < 0.05), DML at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.05), and CSA at each follow-up time point (P < 0.05). Compared to the short-axis group, the long-axis group exhibited more improvement in SSS and FSS at all follow-up time points, with statistical differences at 3, 6, and 12 months (P < 0.05), and in SNCV and DML at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.05). Although the long-axis patients exhibited more improvement in their wrists' CSAs, the intergroup differences were nonsignificant at all follow-up time points (P > 0.05). Four patients in the short-axis group experienced recurrent symptoms and underwent surgery at 12 months, whereas no recurrence was observed in the long-axis group.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>A relevant future trial with a longer follow-up period than this one used is still necessary.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound-guided TCL needle release via the long-axis approach appears to be more effective than the short-axis approach for treating mild to moderate CTS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Transverse Carpal Ligament Release via Different Approaches in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaochen Shi, Jiaan Zhu, Guicheng Li, Xuesong Gu, Hailin Xu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound-guided transverse carpal ligament (TCL) needle release has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, no existing evidence has investigated the comparative efficacy of different release approaches.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided TCL needle release via different approaches for patients with mild to moderate CTS over a 12-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient clinic at a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-four patients with mild to moderate CTS (> 3 months' duration) were randomly assigned to either the long-axis group (one session of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection plus long-axis TCL needle release) or the short-axis group (one session of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection plus short-axis TCL needle release) in a one-to-one ratio. The primary outcomes were the symptom severity scale (SSS) and functional severity scale (FSS) scores of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ). The secondary outcomes were electrophysiological studies, including distal motor latency (DML) and sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve (MN), and patient-reported successful clinical response. Assessments were performed before treatment and at one, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 patients (30 per group) completed the trial. Compared to the baseline, both groups exhibited improvement in SSS, FSS, SNCV, DML, and CSA at all follow-up time points, with statistical differences for SSS, FSS, and SNCV at 3, 6, and 12 months (P < 0.05), DML at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.05), and CSA at each follow-up time point (P < 0.05). Compared to the short-axis group, the long-axis group exhibited more improvement in SSS and FSS at all follow-up time points, with statistical differences at 3, 6, and 12 months (P < 0.05), and in SNCV and DML at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.05). Although the long-axis patients exhibited more improvement in their wrists' CSAs, the intergroup differences were nonsignificant at all follow-up time points (P > 0.05). Four patients in the short-axis group experienced recurrent symptoms and underwent surgery at 12 months, whereas no recurrence was observed in the long-axis group.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>A relevant future trial with a longer follow-up period than this one used is still necessary.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound-guided TCL needle release via the long-axis approach appears to be more effective than the short-axis approach for treating mild to moderate CTS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain physician\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超声引导下的腕横韧带(TCL)针刺松解术已被证明是治疗腕管综合征(CTS)的有效方法。然而,目前还没有证据研究不同松解方法的疗效比较:研究设计:一项前瞻性随机对照研究:研究设计:前瞻性随机对照试验:研究设计:前瞻性随机对照试验:64名轻中度CTS患者(病程超过3个月)按一比一比例随机分配到长轴组(一次超声引导皮质类固醇注射加长轴TCL针松解术)或短轴组(一次超声引导皮质类固醇注射加短轴TCL针松解术)。主要结果是波士顿腕管问卷(BCTQ)的症状严重程度量表(SSS)和功能严重程度量表(FSS)得分。次要结果是电生理研究,包括远端运动潜伏期(DML)和感觉神经传导速度(SNCV)、正中神经(MN)横截面积(CSA)以及患者报告的成功临床反应。评估在治疗前、治疗后 1 个月、3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月进行:共有 60 名患者(每组 30 人)完成了试验。与基线相比,两组患者在所有随访时间点的 SSS、FSS、SNCV、DML 和 CSA 均有改善,其中 SSS、FSS 和 SNCV 在 3、6 和 12 个月时有统计学差异(P < 0.05),DML 在 6 和 12 个月时有统计学差异(P < 0.05),CSA 在每个随访时间点均有统计学差异(P < 0.05)。与短轴组相比,长轴组在所有随访时间点的 SSS 和 FSS 改善程度更大,在 3、6 和 12 个月时有统计学差异(P < 0.05),在 6 和 12 个月时的 SNCV 和 DML 改善程度更大(P < 0.05)。虽然长轴患者的腕关节 CSA 改善幅度更大,但在所有随访时间点上,组间差异均不显著(P > 0.05)。短轴组有四名患者症状复发,并在12个月后接受了手术,而长轴组患者没有复发:局限性:今后仍有必要进行相关试验,且随访时间应比本次试验更长:结论:超声引导下的长轴TCL针松解术治疗轻度至中度CTS似乎比短轴法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Transverse Carpal Ligament Release via Different Approaches in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Background: Ultrasound-guided transverse carpal ligament (TCL) needle release has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, no existing evidence has investigated the comparative efficacy of different release approaches.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided TCL needle release via different approaches for patients with mild to moderate CTS over a 12-month follow-up.

Study design: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Setting: Outpatient clinic at a university hospital.

Methods: Sixty-four patients with mild to moderate CTS (> 3 months' duration) were randomly assigned to either the long-axis group (one session of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection plus long-axis TCL needle release) or the short-axis group (one session of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection plus short-axis TCL needle release) in a one-to-one ratio. The primary outcomes were the symptom severity scale (SSS) and functional severity scale (FSS) scores of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ). The secondary outcomes were electrophysiological studies, including distal motor latency (DML) and sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve (MN), and patient-reported successful clinical response. Assessments were performed before treatment and at one, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment.

Results: A total of 60 patients (30 per group) completed the trial. Compared to the baseline, both groups exhibited improvement in SSS, FSS, SNCV, DML, and CSA at all follow-up time points, with statistical differences for SSS, FSS, and SNCV at 3, 6, and 12 months (P < 0.05), DML at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.05), and CSA at each follow-up time point (P < 0.05). Compared to the short-axis group, the long-axis group exhibited more improvement in SSS and FSS at all follow-up time points, with statistical differences at 3, 6, and 12 months (P < 0.05), and in SNCV and DML at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.05). Although the long-axis patients exhibited more improvement in their wrists' CSAs, the intergroup differences were nonsignificant at all follow-up time points (P > 0.05). Four patients in the short-axis group experienced recurrent symptoms and underwent surgery at 12 months, whereas no recurrence was observed in the long-axis group.

Limitations: A relevant future trial with a longer follow-up period than this one used is still necessary.

Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided TCL needle release via the long-axis approach appears to be more effective than the short-axis approach for treating mild to moderate CTS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信