暂时性脊髓刺激治疗难治性带状疱疹后遗神经痛的疗效分析。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-09-01
Xin Li, Yaping Wang, Kai Chen, Dingquan Zou
{"title":"暂时性脊髓刺激治疗难治性带状疱疹后遗神经痛的疗效分析。","authors":"Xin Li, Yaping Wang, Kai Chen, Dingquan Zou","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal cord stimulation can be considered in PHN patients if conservative treatment is not effective. However, the long-term pain outcomes of temporary (7-14 days) spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) in refractory PHN patients with a course of more than 3 months have not been  documented.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of tSCS as a treatment for refractory PHN.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Pain Department in a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 52 patients with refractory PHN were treated with tSCS between March 2018 and February 2021. Their medical records were collected, and the patients were divided into 3 groups according to the course of their disease into the medium-term group, long-term group and ultra-long-term group. The changes in the numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) responses, pain relief rate, postoperative efficiency and patients' use of analgesics were recorded before the operation, 3 days, 10 days, one month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average NRS scores, the maximum NRS scores and the PSQI scores at 3 days, 10 days, one month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the operation were significantly lower than those before the operation (P < 0.05). The average NRS scores and the maximum NRS scores of all groups increased significantly from one month to 6 months compared to those at 10 days after the tSCS treatment, and they decreased significantly at 12 months compared with 6 months post-operation. The average NRS scores of the medium-term and long-term group were significantly lower than that of the ultra-long-term group at 1-3 months after the operation, and the maximum NRS scores at one month, 3 months and 12 months after the operation were also significantly lower in the medium-term and long-term group compared to the ultra-long-term group. The average PSQI scores at 1-12 months after the operation were not significantly higher than that at 10 days after the operation, but it decreased significantly at 12 months compared with 6 months after the operation. Among the 3 groups, the PSQI scores of the medium-term and long-term group were significantly lower than those of the ultra-long-term group at 6 months after the operation. The postoperative pain relief rate ranged from 41.51%-59.81%, and the total effective rate was 42.31%-69.23%, and there was no significant difference among the 3 groups. Some patients still needed analgesics at 12 months after the operation, but the number of patients who were taking medications post-operation was significantly lower than that before the operation.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This is a single-center retrospective study with the inability to completely control for variables. Additionally, the number of cases is small and the follow-up duration is short.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>tSCS can be used as a safe and effective method to relieve refractory PHN, and the curative effect is substantially higher in patients with a disease course of 3-12 months compared to that in patients with a course of more than 12 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy Analysis of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Refractory Postherpetic Neuralgia.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Li, Yaping Wang, Kai Chen, Dingquan Zou\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal cord stimulation can be considered in PHN patients if conservative treatment is not effective. However, the long-term pain outcomes of temporary (7-14 days) spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) in refractory PHN patients with a course of more than 3 months have not been  documented.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of tSCS as a treatment for refractory PHN.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Pain Department in a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 52 patients with refractory PHN were treated with tSCS between March 2018 and February 2021. Their medical records were collected, and the patients were divided into 3 groups according to the course of their disease into the medium-term group, long-term group and ultra-long-term group. The changes in the numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) responses, pain relief rate, postoperative efficiency and patients' use of analgesics were recorded before the operation, 3 days, 10 days, one month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average NRS scores, the maximum NRS scores and the PSQI scores at 3 days, 10 days, one month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the operation were significantly lower than those before the operation (P < 0.05). The average NRS scores and the maximum NRS scores of all groups increased significantly from one month to 6 months compared to those at 10 days after the tSCS treatment, and they decreased significantly at 12 months compared with 6 months post-operation. The average NRS scores of the medium-term and long-term group were significantly lower than that of the ultra-long-term group at 1-3 months after the operation, and the maximum NRS scores at one month, 3 months and 12 months after the operation were also significantly lower in the medium-term and long-term group compared to the ultra-long-term group. The average PSQI scores at 1-12 months after the operation were not significantly higher than that at 10 days after the operation, but it decreased significantly at 12 months compared with 6 months after the operation. Among the 3 groups, the PSQI scores of the medium-term and long-term group were significantly lower than those of the ultra-long-term group at 6 months after the operation. The postoperative pain relief rate ranged from 41.51%-59.81%, and the total effective rate was 42.31%-69.23%, and there was no significant difference among the 3 groups. Some patients still needed analgesics at 12 months after the operation, but the number of patients who were taking medications post-operation was significantly lower than that before the operation.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This is a single-center retrospective study with the inability to completely control for variables. Additionally, the number of cases is small and the follow-up duration is short.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>tSCS can be used as a safe and effective method to relieve refractory PHN, and the curative effect is substantially higher in patients with a disease course of 3-12 months compared to that in patients with a course of more than 12 months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain physician\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:如果保守治疗无效,PHN 患者可考虑接受脊髓刺激治疗。然而,对于病程超过 3 个月的难治性 PHN 患者,暂时性(7-14 天)脊髓刺激疗法(tSCS)的长期疼痛疗效尚未得到证实:研究设计:回顾性研究:研究设计:回顾性研究:研究设计:回顾性研究:2018年3月至2021年2月期间,共有52名难治性PHN患者接受了tSCS治疗。收集他们的病历资料,根据病程将患者分为 3 组,即中期组、长期组和超长期组。记录患者术前、术后3天、10天、1个月、3个月、6个月和12个月的数字评分量表(NRS)评分、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)反应、疼痛缓解率、术后有效率和镇痛药使用情况的变化:术后 3 天、10 天、1 个月、3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月的平均 NRS 评分、最大 NRS 评分和 PSQI 评分均显著低于术前(P < 0.05)。各组的平均 NRS 评分和最大 NRS 评分在术后 1 个月至 6 个月期间均比术后 10 天时明显升高,而在术后 12 个月时则比术后 6 个月时明显降低。中长期组术后 1-3 个月的平均 NRS 评分明显低于超长期组,中长期组术后 1 个月、3 个月和 12 个月的最大 NRS 评分也明显低于超长期组。术后1-12个月的平均PSQI评分与术后10天的评分相比没有明显升高,但术后12个月的评分与术后6个月的评分相比明显下降。三组中,中期组和长期组术后6个月的PSQI评分明显低于超长期组。术后疼痛缓解率为41.51%-59.81%,总有效率为42.31%-69.23%,三组间无明显差异。部分患者在术后12个月仍需使用镇痛药,但术后服药的患者人数明显少于术前:局限性:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,无法完全控制各种变量。结论:tSCS 是一种安全有效的缓解难治性 PHN 的方法,与病程超过 12 个月的患者相比,病程在 3-12 个月的患者的疗效要高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy Analysis of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Refractory Postherpetic Neuralgia.

Background: Spinal cord stimulation can be considered in PHN patients if conservative treatment is not effective. However, the long-term pain outcomes of temporary (7-14 days) spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) in refractory PHN patients with a course of more than 3 months have not been  documented.

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of tSCS as a treatment for refractory PHN.

Study design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Pain Department in a university hospital.

Methods: A total of 52 patients with refractory PHN were treated with tSCS between March 2018 and February 2021. Their medical records were collected, and the patients were divided into 3 groups according to the course of their disease into the medium-term group, long-term group and ultra-long-term group. The changes in the numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) responses, pain relief rate, postoperative efficiency and patients' use of analgesics were recorded before the operation, 3 days, 10 days, one month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the operation.

Results: The average NRS scores, the maximum NRS scores and the PSQI scores at 3 days, 10 days, one month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the operation were significantly lower than those before the operation (P < 0.05). The average NRS scores and the maximum NRS scores of all groups increased significantly from one month to 6 months compared to those at 10 days after the tSCS treatment, and they decreased significantly at 12 months compared with 6 months post-operation. The average NRS scores of the medium-term and long-term group were significantly lower than that of the ultra-long-term group at 1-3 months after the operation, and the maximum NRS scores at one month, 3 months and 12 months after the operation were also significantly lower in the medium-term and long-term group compared to the ultra-long-term group. The average PSQI scores at 1-12 months after the operation were not significantly higher than that at 10 days after the operation, but it decreased significantly at 12 months compared with 6 months after the operation. Among the 3 groups, the PSQI scores of the medium-term and long-term group were significantly lower than those of the ultra-long-term group at 6 months after the operation. The postoperative pain relief rate ranged from 41.51%-59.81%, and the total effective rate was 42.31%-69.23%, and there was no significant difference among the 3 groups. Some patients still needed analgesics at 12 months after the operation, but the number of patients who were taking medications post-operation was significantly lower than that before the operation.

Limitations: This is a single-center retrospective study with the inability to completely control for variables. Additionally, the number of cases is small and the follow-up duration is short.

Conclusion: tSCS can be used as a safe and effective method to relieve refractory PHN, and the curative effect is substantially higher in patients with a disease course of 3-12 months compared to that in patients with a course of more than 12 months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信