Fiona Quirke, Linda Biesty, Malcolm Battin, Frank Harry Bloomfield, Mandy Daly, Elaine Finucane, Patricia Healy, Tim Hurley, Jamie J Kirkham, Eleanor Molloy, David M Haas, Shireen Meher, Elaine Ní Bhraonáin, Karen Walker, James Webbe, Declan Devane
{"title":"新生儿脑病:治疗结果报告的系统回顾。","authors":"Fiona Quirke, Linda Biesty, Malcolm Battin, Frank Harry Bloomfield, Mandy Daly, Elaine Finucane, Patricia Healy, Tim Hurley, Jamie J Kirkham, Eleanor Molloy, David M Haas, Shireen Meher, Elaine Ní Bhraonáin, Karen Walker, James Webbe, Declan Devane","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is a multi-organ condition potentially leading to death or long-term neurodisability. Therapeutic hypothermia is the standard treatment for NE; however, long-term impairments remain common. Studies of new treatments for NE often measure and report different outcomes. Core outcome sets (COSs), a minimum set of outcomes to be measured and reported in all studies for a condition, address this problem. This paper aimed to identify outcomes reported (primary, secondary, adverse events and other reported outcomes) in (1) randomised trials and (2) systematic reviews of randomised trials of interventions for the treatment of NE in the process of developing a COS for interventions for the treatment of NE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We completed a systematic search for outcomes used to evaluate treatments for NE using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Two reviewers screened all included articles independently. Outcomes were extracted verbatim, similar outcomes were grouped and outcome domains were developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>386 outcomes were reported in 116 papers, from 85 studies. Outcomes were categorised into 18 domains. No outcome was reported by all studies, a single study reported 11 outcomes and it was not explicitly stated that outcomes had input from parents.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Heterogeneity in reported outcomes means that synthesis of studies evaluating new treatments for NE remains difficult. A COS, that includes parental/family input, is needed to ensure consistency in measuring and reporting outcomes, and to enable comparison of randomised trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11425948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neonatal encephalopathy: a systematic review of reported treatment outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Quirke, Linda Biesty, Malcolm Battin, Frank Harry Bloomfield, Mandy Daly, Elaine Finucane, Patricia Healy, Tim Hurley, Jamie J Kirkham, Eleanor Molloy, David M Haas, Shireen Meher, Elaine Ní Bhraonáin, Karen Walker, James Webbe, Declan Devane\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is a multi-organ condition potentially leading to death or long-term neurodisability. Therapeutic hypothermia is the standard treatment for NE; however, long-term impairments remain common. Studies of new treatments for NE often measure and report different outcomes. Core outcome sets (COSs), a minimum set of outcomes to be measured and reported in all studies for a condition, address this problem. This paper aimed to identify outcomes reported (primary, secondary, adverse events and other reported outcomes) in (1) randomised trials and (2) systematic reviews of randomised trials of interventions for the treatment of NE in the process of developing a COS for interventions for the treatment of NE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We completed a systematic search for outcomes used to evaluate treatments for NE using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Two reviewers screened all included articles independently. Outcomes were extracted verbatim, similar outcomes were grouped and outcome domains were developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>386 outcomes were reported in 116 papers, from 85 studies. Outcomes were categorised into 18 domains. No outcome was reported by all studies, a single study reported 11 outcomes and it was not explicitly stated that outcomes had input from parents.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Heterogeneity in reported outcomes means that synthesis of studies evaluating new treatments for NE remains difficult. A COS, that includes parental/family input, is needed to ensure consistency in measuring and reporting outcomes, and to enable comparison of randomised trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11425948/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002510\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002510","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:新生儿脑病(NE)是一种可能导致死亡或长期神经功能障碍的多器官疾病。治疗性低温是治疗新生儿脑病的标准方法,但长期损害仍很常见。有关 NE 新疗法的研究通常会测量和报告不同的结果。核心结果集(COS)是针对某一病症的所有研究中必须测量和报告的最低限度结果集,可解决这一问题。本文旨在确定(1)随机试验中报告的结果(主要结果、次要结果、不良事件和其他报告结果),以及(2)在为治疗NE的干预措施制定COS的过程中,对治疗NE的干预措施的随机试验进行的系统性回顾:我们使用MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane CENTRAL、Cochrane系统性综述数据库和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台对用于评估NE治疗方法的结果进行了系统性检索。两名审稿人独立筛选了所有纳入的文章。对结果进行逐字提取,对相似结果进行分组,并建立结果域:共有 85 项研究的 116 篇论文报告了 386 项结果。结果分为 18 个领域。所有研究均未报告任何结果,只有一项研究报告了 11 项结果,而且没有明确指出结果是否来自家长的意见:讨论:所报告结果的异质性意味着对评估 NE 新疗法的研究进行综合仍有困难。为了确保测量和报告结果的一致性,并对随机试验进行比较,需要制定包括家长/家庭意见在内的COS。
Neonatal encephalopathy: a systematic review of reported treatment outcomes.
Background: Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is a multi-organ condition potentially leading to death or long-term neurodisability. Therapeutic hypothermia is the standard treatment for NE; however, long-term impairments remain common. Studies of new treatments for NE often measure and report different outcomes. Core outcome sets (COSs), a minimum set of outcomes to be measured and reported in all studies for a condition, address this problem. This paper aimed to identify outcomes reported (primary, secondary, adverse events and other reported outcomes) in (1) randomised trials and (2) systematic reviews of randomised trials of interventions for the treatment of NE in the process of developing a COS for interventions for the treatment of NE.
Methods: We completed a systematic search for outcomes used to evaluate treatments for NE using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Two reviewers screened all included articles independently. Outcomes were extracted verbatim, similar outcomes were grouped and outcome domains were developed.
Results: 386 outcomes were reported in 116 papers, from 85 studies. Outcomes were categorised into 18 domains. No outcome was reported by all studies, a single study reported 11 outcomes and it was not explicitly stated that outcomes had input from parents.
Discussion: Heterogeneity in reported outcomes means that synthesis of studies evaluating new treatments for NE remains difficult. A COS, that includes parental/family input, is needed to ensure consistency in measuring and reporting outcomes, and to enable comparison of randomised trials.