缩小高等教育研究与管理教育之间的差距

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
{"title":"缩小高等教育研究与管理教育之间的差距","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The purpose of this paper is to address the gaps between the higher education research, and management education. These two fields seem to have developed with surprisingly little interaction, an impression that is reinforced by citation count. As a guide to redressing this situation, this paper explores an important subset of the higher education literature, sometimes called the “student learning” research, and its implications for management education. This research underpins government-sponsored surveys of program quality in Britain and Australia. I argue that it offers new insights into course structure, pedagogy and assessment. If we want students to understand, evaluate and critically analyze management situations, it is counterproductive to use pedagogies or assessments that higher education research has shown to actually undermine these objectives. The student learning literature offers guidelines for course design and simple approaches to course evaluation. Interventions based on this research have shown remarkable improvements in learning outcomes. Implications for practice and opportunities for research are noted throughout the paper.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47191,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing the gaps between higher education research and management education\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The purpose of this paper is to address the gaps between the higher education research, and management education. These two fields seem to have developed with surprisingly little interaction, an impression that is reinforced by citation count. As a guide to redressing this situation, this paper explores an important subset of the higher education literature, sometimes called the “student learning” research, and its implications for management education. This research underpins government-sponsored surveys of program quality in Britain and Australia. I argue that it offers new insights into course structure, pedagogy and assessment. If we want students to understand, evaluate and critically analyze management situations, it is counterproductive to use pedagogies or assessments that higher education research has shown to actually undermine these objectives. The student learning literature offers guidelines for course design and simple approaches to course evaluation. Interventions based on this research have shown remarkable improvements in learning outcomes. Implications for practice and opportunities for research are noted throughout the paper.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Management Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Management Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811724001277\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Education","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811724001277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在探讨高等教育研究与管理教育之间的差距。这两个领域在发展过程中的互动似乎少得出奇,而引用次数则加深了这一印象。作为纠正这种状况的指南,本文探讨了高等教育文献中的一个重要子集,有时称为 "学生学习 "研究,及其对管理教育的影响。这项研究是英国和澳大利亚政府资助的课程质量调查的基础。我认为,它为课程结构、教学法和评估提供了新的见解。如果我们希望学生理解、评估和批判性地分析管理情况,那么使用高等教育研究表明实际上会破坏这些目标的教学法或评估方法就会适得其反。学生学习文献提供了课程设计指南和简单的课程评估方法。基于这些研究的干预措施已经显示出学习效果的显著改善。本文贯穿了对实践的启示和研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addressing the gaps between higher education research and management education
The purpose of this paper is to address the gaps between the higher education research, and management education. These two fields seem to have developed with surprisingly little interaction, an impression that is reinforced by citation count. As a guide to redressing this situation, this paper explores an important subset of the higher education literature, sometimes called the “student learning” research, and its implications for management education. This research underpins government-sponsored surveys of program quality in Britain and Australia. I argue that it offers new insights into course structure, pedagogy and assessment. If we want students to understand, evaluate and critically analyze management situations, it is counterproductive to use pedagogies or assessments that higher education research has shown to actually undermine these objectives. The student learning literature offers guidelines for course design and simple approaches to course evaluation. Interventions based on this research have shown remarkable improvements in learning outcomes. Implications for practice and opportunities for research are noted throughout the paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
136
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Education provides a forum for scholarly reporting and discussion of developments in all aspects of teaching and learning in business and management. The Journal seeks reflective papers which bring together pedagogy and theories of management learning; descriptions of innovative teaching which include critical reflection on implementation and outcomes will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信