反映记忆编码过程中可用认知资源量的神经指数:基于模型的方法

IF 2.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Si Ma, Vencislav Popov, Qiong Zhang
{"title":"反映记忆编码过程中可用认知资源量的神经指数:基于模型的方法","authors":"Si Ma, Vencislav Popov, Qiong Zhang","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans have a limited amount of cognitive resources to process various cognitive operations at a given moment. The Source of Activation Confusion model of episodic memory proposes that resources are consumed during each processing, and once depleted, they need time to recover gradually. This has been supported by a series of behavioral findings in the past. However, the neural substrate of the resources is not known. In the present study, over an existing electroencephalogram data set of a free recall task (Kahana et al., 2022), we provided a neural index reflecting the amount of cognitive resources available for forming new memory traces. Unique to our approach, we obtained the neural index not through correlating neural patterns with behavior outcomes or experimental conditions, but by demonstrating its alignment with a latent quantity of cognitive resources inferred from the Source of Activation Confusion model. In addition, we showed that the identified neural index can be used to propose novel hypothesis regarding other long-term memory phenomena. Specifically, we found that according to the neural index, neural encoding patterns for subsequently recalled items correspond to greater available cognitive resources compared with those for subsequently unrecalled items. This provides a mechanistic account for the long-established subsequent memory effects (i.e., differential neural encoding patterns between subsequently recalled vs. subsequently unrecalled items), which has been previously associated with attention, fatigue, and properties of the stimuli. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A neural index reflecting the amount of cognitive resources available during memory encoding: A model-based approach.\",\"authors\":\"Si Ma, Vencislav Popov, Qiong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xlm0001364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Humans have a limited amount of cognitive resources to process various cognitive operations at a given moment. The Source of Activation Confusion model of episodic memory proposes that resources are consumed during each processing, and once depleted, they need time to recover gradually. This has been supported by a series of behavioral findings in the past. However, the neural substrate of the resources is not known. In the present study, over an existing electroencephalogram data set of a free recall task (Kahana et al., 2022), we provided a neural index reflecting the amount of cognitive resources available for forming new memory traces. Unique to our approach, we obtained the neural index not through correlating neural patterns with behavior outcomes or experimental conditions, but by demonstrating its alignment with a latent quantity of cognitive resources inferred from the Source of Activation Confusion model. In addition, we showed that the identified neural index can be used to propose novel hypothesis regarding other long-term memory phenomena. Specifically, we found that according to the neural index, neural encoding patterns for subsequently recalled items correspond to greater available cognitive resources compared with those for subsequently unrecalled items. This provides a mechanistic account for the long-established subsequent memory effects (i.e., differential neural encoding patterns between subsequently recalled vs. subsequently unrecalled items), which has been previously associated with attention, fatigue, and properties of the stimuli. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001364\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001364","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类在特定时刻处理各种认知操作的认知资源是有限的。外显记忆的 "激活源混淆模型 "提出,资源在每次处理过程中都会消耗,一旦耗尽,就需要时间来逐渐恢复。过去的一系列行为学研究结果都支持这一观点。然而,这些资源的神经基质尚不清楚。在本研究中,通过现有的自由回忆任务脑电图数据集(Kahana 等人,2022 年),我们提供了一个神经指数,反映了可用于形成新记忆痕迹的认知资源量。我们的方法与众不同,不是通过将神经模式与行为结果或实验条件相关联,而是通过证明其与从激活源混淆模型中推断出的认知资源的潜在数量相一致,从而获得神经指数。此外,我们还证明了所识别的神经指数可用于提出有关其他长期记忆现象的新假设。具体来说,我们发现根据神经指数,与随后未被回忆的项目相比,随后被回忆项目的神经编码模式对应于更大的可用认知资源。这为长期以来形成的后续记忆效应(即后续回忆项目与后续未回忆项目之间的不同神经编码模式)提供了一个机理解释,而后续记忆效应与注意力、疲劳和刺激物的特性有关。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A neural index reflecting the amount of cognitive resources available during memory encoding: A model-based approach.

Humans have a limited amount of cognitive resources to process various cognitive operations at a given moment. The Source of Activation Confusion model of episodic memory proposes that resources are consumed during each processing, and once depleted, they need time to recover gradually. This has been supported by a series of behavioral findings in the past. However, the neural substrate of the resources is not known. In the present study, over an existing electroencephalogram data set of a free recall task (Kahana et al., 2022), we provided a neural index reflecting the amount of cognitive resources available for forming new memory traces. Unique to our approach, we obtained the neural index not through correlating neural patterns with behavior outcomes or experimental conditions, but by demonstrating its alignment with a latent quantity of cognitive resources inferred from the Source of Activation Confusion model. In addition, we showed that the identified neural index can be used to propose novel hypothesis regarding other long-term memory phenomena. Specifically, we found that according to the neural index, neural encoding patterns for subsequently recalled items correspond to greater available cognitive resources compared with those for subsequently unrecalled items. This provides a mechanistic account for the long-established subsequent memory effects (i.e., differential neural encoding patterns between subsequently recalled vs. subsequently unrecalled items), which has been previously associated with attention, fatigue, and properties of the stimuli. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信