基于临床推理理论的评估标准的初步验证：电子德尔菲研究

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Nursing Education Perspectives Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001320

Marie-France Deschênes, Éric Dionne, Laura Robert-Boluda

{"title":"基于临床推理理论的评估标准的初步验证：电子德尔菲研究","authors":"Marie-France Deschênes, Éric Dionne, Laura Robert-Boluda","doi":"10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Questions persist regarding the evaluation of cognitive processes related to clinical reasoning when resolving situations in a learning by concordance tool. This Delphi technique study aimed to validate a clinical reasoning assessment rubric based on script theory. Seventeen experts participated in the study. Two rounds of consultation were conducted to obtain a consensus on the accuracy and clarity of the rubric descriptors (clarity index and content validity index ≥ 0.9). The results inform future research procedures and the intended use of the rubric to facilitate evaluator inferences, provide student feedback, and support the development of learners' clinical reasoning.","PeriodicalId":47651,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Education Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":"173-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary Validation of a Clinical Reasoning Theory-Based Assessment Rubric: An e-Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"Marie-France Deschênes, Éric Dionne, Laura Robert-Boluda\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Questions persist regarding the evaluation of cognitive processes related to clinical reasoning when resolving situations in a learning by concordance tool. This Delphi technique study aimed to validate a clinical reasoning assessment rubric based on script theory. Seventeen experts participated in the study. Two rounds of consultation were conducted to obtain a consensus on the accuracy and clarity of the rubric descriptors (clarity index and content validity index ≥ 0.9). The results inform future research procedures and the intended use of the rubric to facilitate evaluator inferences, provide student feedback, and support the development of learners' clinical reasoning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Education Perspectives\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"173-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039906/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Education Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Education Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要：在通过协调学习工具解决情境时，与临床推理相关的认知过程的评估问题一直存在。这项德尔菲技术研究旨在验证基于脚本理论的临床推理评估标准。17 位专家参与了研究。研究人员进行了两轮咨询，就评分标准描述符的准确性和清晰度（清晰度指数和内容效度指数≥ 0.9）达成了共识。研究结果为今后的研究程序和评分标准的预期使用提供了参考，以促进评估者的推断，为学生提供反馈，并支持学习者临床推理能力的发展。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Preliminary Validation of a Clinical Reasoning Theory-Based Assessment Rubric: An e-Delphi Study.

Abstract: Questions persist regarding the evaluation of cognitive processes related to clinical reasoning when resolving situations in a learning by concordance tool. This Delphi technique study aimed to validate a clinical reasoning assessment rubric based on script theory. Seventeen experts participated in the study. Two rounds of consultation were conducted to obtain a consensus on the accuracy and clarity of the rubric descriptors (clarity index and content validity index ≥ 0.9). The results inform future research procedures and the intended use of the rubric to facilitate evaluator inferences, provide student feedback, and support the development of learners' clinical reasoning.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Nursing Education Perspectives EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

197

期刊介绍： A publication of the National League for Nursing, Nursing Education Perspectives is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly journal that provides evidence for best practices in nursing education. Through the publication of rigorously designed studies, the journal contributes to the advancement of the science of nursing education. It serves as a forum for research and innovation regarding teaching and learning, curricula, technology, and other issues important to nursing education. Today, as nurse educators strive to advance research in nursing education and break away from established patterns and chart new pathways in nursing education, Nursing Education Perspectives is a vital resource. Nursing Education Perspectives is housed in the NLN Chamberlain College of Nursing for the Advancement of the Science of Nursing Education.