{"title":"单胺氧化酶-B 抑制剂治疗早期帕金森病的效果和安全性:网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Yaping Wang, Zhiyun Wang","doi":"10.1159/000541315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects and safety of monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors (MAO-B inhibitors) for early Parkinson's disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All studies that assessed the efficacy of MAO-B inhibitors in patients with early PD were searched. Publications were screened, and data were extracted according to predefined criteria. Rev Man 5.4 and Stata 14.0 software were used for statistical analysis. Outcomes assessed included change of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total score, UPDRS part II score, UPDRS part III score, and the incidence of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty trials were identified and included in this meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, rasagiline, selegiline, safinamide, and zonisamide were significantly more effective, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -0.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.64 to -0.18), SMD = -0.38 (95% CI = -0.51 to -0.24), SMD = -0.37 (95% CI = -0.54 to -0.21), and SMD = -0.31 (95% CI = -0.57 to -0.05) on the UPDRS III score change, respectively. The surface under the cumulative ranking results showed that rasagiline ranked first in improving UPDRS II and UPDRS III, respectively. For safety outcomes, safinamide combination with dopaminergic treatment had lower risk of incurring any adverse events (risk ratio = 0.1, 95% CI = 0.01-0.2), and no statistical difference in incidence of adverse events was observed among other MAO-B inhibitor regimes and placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rasagiline, selegiline, safinamide, and zonisamide were effective compared to placebo in the treatment of early PD, but rasagiline was the most effective drug. As for safety, safinamide combination with dopaminergic treatment had lower risk of incurring any adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":12065,"journal":{"name":"European Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"273-290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects and Safety of Monoamine Oxidase-B Inhibitors for Early Parkinson's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yaping Wang, Zhiyun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000541315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects and safety of monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors (MAO-B inhibitors) for early Parkinson's disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All studies that assessed the efficacy of MAO-B inhibitors in patients with early PD were searched. Publications were screened, and data were extracted according to predefined criteria. Rev Man 5.4 and Stata 14.0 software were used for statistical analysis. Outcomes assessed included change of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total score, UPDRS part II score, UPDRS part III score, and the incidence of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty trials were identified and included in this meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, rasagiline, selegiline, safinamide, and zonisamide were significantly more effective, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -0.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.64 to -0.18), SMD = -0.38 (95% CI = -0.51 to -0.24), SMD = -0.37 (95% CI = -0.54 to -0.21), and SMD = -0.31 (95% CI = -0.57 to -0.05) on the UPDRS III score change, respectively. The surface under the cumulative ranking results showed that rasagiline ranked first in improving UPDRS II and UPDRS III, respectively. For safety outcomes, safinamide combination with dopaminergic treatment had lower risk of incurring any adverse events (risk ratio = 0.1, 95% CI = 0.01-0.2), and no statistical difference in incidence of adverse events was observed among other MAO-B inhibitor regimes and placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rasagiline, selegiline, safinamide, and zonisamide were effective compared to placebo in the treatment of early PD, but rasagiline was the most effective drug. As for safety, safinamide combination with dopaminergic treatment had lower risk of incurring any adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"273-290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541315\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:评估单胺氧化酶 B 抑制剂(MAO-B 抑制剂)治疗早期帕金森病的效果和安全性:评估单胺氧化酶 B 抑制剂(MAO-B 抑制剂)治疗早期帕金森病的效果和安全性:方法:检索所有评估MAO-B抑制剂对早期帕金森病患者疗效的研究。按照预先确定的标准筛选文献并提取数据。使用Rev Man 5.4和Stata 14.0软件进行统计分析。评估的结果包括统一帕金森病评分量表(UPDRS)总分、UPDRS第二部分评分、UPDRS第三部分评分的变化以及不良事件的发生率:本次荟萃分析共确定并纳入了 30 项试验。与安慰剂相比,拉沙吉林、西格列汀、沙芬那胺和唑尼沙胺的疗效显著,其UPDRS III评分变化的标准化平均差(SMD)分别为-0.41(95%置信区间(CI)=-0.64至-0.18)、SMD=-0.38(95%CI=-0.51至-0.24)、SMD=-0.37(95%CI=-0.54至-0.21)和SMD=-0.31(95%CI=-0.57至-0.05)。表面累积排名(SUCRA)结果显示,在改善UPDRS II和UPDRS III方面,拉沙吉林分别排名第一。在安全性方面,沙芬那胺联合多巴胺能治疗发生任何不良事件的风险较低(风险比=0.1 95% CI=0.01至0.2),其他MAO-B抑制剂方案和安慰剂在不良事件发生率方面没有统计学差异:总之,与安慰剂相比,拉沙吉兰、西格列汀、沙芬酰胺和唑尼沙胺对治疗早期帕金森病有效,但拉沙吉兰是最有效的药物。在安全性方面,沙芬胺联合多巴胺能治疗发生不良反应的风险较低。
Effects and Safety of Monoamine Oxidase-B Inhibitors for Early Parkinson's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects and safety of monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors (MAO-B inhibitors) for early Parkinson's disease (PD).
Methods: All studies that assessed the efficacy of MAO-B inhibitors in patients with early PD were searched. Publications were screened, and data were extracted according to predefined criteria. Rev Man 5.4 and Stata 14.0 software were used for statistical analysis. Outcomes assessed included change of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total score, UPDRS part II score, UPDRS part III score, and the incidence of adverse events.
Results: Thirty trials were identified and included in this meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, rasagiline, selegiline, safinamide, and zonisamide were significantly more effective, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -0.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.64 to -0.18), SMD = -0.38 (95% CI = -0.51 to -0.24), SMD = -0.37 (95% CI = -0.54 to -0.21), and SMD = -0.31 (95% CI = -0.57 to -0.05) on the UPDRS III score change, respectively. The surface under the cumulative ranking results showed that rasagiline ranked first in improving UPDRS II and UPDRS III, respectively. For safety outcomes, safinamide combination with dopaminergic treatment had lower risk of incurring any adverse events (risk ratio = 0.1, 95% CI = 0.01-0.2), and no statistical difference in incidence of adverse events was observed among other MAO-B inhibitor regimes and placebo.
Conclusion: Rasagiline, selegiline, safinamide, and zonisamide were effective compared to placebo in the treatment of early PD, but rasagiline was the most effective drug. As for safety, safinamide combination with dopaminergic treatment had lower risk of incurring any adverse events.
期刊介绍:
''European Neurology'' publishes original papers, reviews and letters to the editor. Papers presented in this journal cover clinical aspects of diseases of the nervous system and muscles, as well as their neuropathological, biochemical, and electrophysiological basis. New diagnostic probes, pharmacological and surgical treatments are evaluated from clinical evidence and basic investigative studies. The journal also features original works and reviews on the history of neurology.