在三年级医学生的外科实习中,在带有视听内容的形成性、客观、结构化临床考试中,验证检查表并评估腹痛病例的模拟临床技能

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
JJ Ruiz-Manzanera PhD , J Almela-Baeza PhD , A Aliaga MD , G Ádanez PhD , F Alconchel PhD , JM Rodríguez PhD , F Sánchez-Bueno , P Ramírez , B Febrero PhD
{"title":"在三年级医学生的外科实习中,在带有视听内容的形成性、客观、结构化临床考试中,验证检查表并评估腹痛病例的模拟临床技能","authors":"JJ Ruiz-Manzanera PhD ,&nbsp;J Almela-Baeza PhD ,&nbsp;A Aliaga MD ,&nbsp;G Ádanez PhD ,&nbsp;F Alconchel PhD ,&nbsp;JM Rodríguez PhD ,&nbsp;F Sánchez-Bueno ,&nbsp;P Ramírez ,&nbsp;B Febrero PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>The objective of this study was to develop and validate 6 checklists for evaluating abdominal pain in clinical simulation scenarios; to assess student competencies in managing 6 clinical cases using OSCE, based on faculty evaluations; and to analyze discrepancies between faculty and student evaluations.</p></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><p>A practical workshop was designed to address 6 clinical scenarios of abdominal surgical conditions. Four scenarios employed medium fidelity simulators, while 2 scenarios employed standardized patient methodology. Prior to the workshop, students received theoretical audiovisual material. At the conclusion of the workshop, students were evaluated using checklists that assessed communication, privacy, anamnesis, and technical skills. Ten workshops were conducted over 3 years, using the OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) format for evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><p>In the statistical analysis, t-Student tests or ANOVA were employed to ascertain whether there were any significant differences between the groups. In the process of validating checklists for clinical scenarios, 6 experts were asked to evaluate each item on a scale of 1 to 9. To assess the degree of agreement among experts, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was employed.</p></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANTS</h3><p>The study involved a total of 670 third-year medical students from the University of Murcia (UMU), Spain, who participated in the subject \"Medical-Surgical Skills.\"</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>High levels of appropriateness were observed for the checklist items, with mean scores above 7.5 points, as well as high levels of inter-expert agreement. Students obtained a mean score of 8 points in the evaluation of each clinical scenario. No significant differences were found between faculty and student scores (p &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>The learning method focused on clinical scenarios of abdominal surgical diseases effectively enhanced the clinical skills of third-year medical students. It used pre-existing audiovisual materials, hands-on workshops with medium-fidelity simulators, and standardized patients. Consistent evaluations from students and faculty confirmed the efficacy of these strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"81 11","pages":"Pages 1756-1763"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193172042400391X/pdfft?md5=a0834c6283947dbd2aade95137c7ecae&pid=1-s2.0-S193172042400391X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Checklists and Evaluation of Clinical Skills in Cases of Abdominal Pain With Simulation in Formative, Objective, Structured Clinical Examination With Audiovisual Content in Third-Year Medical Students' Surgical Clerkship\",\"authors\":\"JJ Ruiz-Manzanera PhD ,&nbsp;J Almela-Baeza PhD ,&nbsp;A Aliaga MD ,&nbsp;G Ádanez PhD ,&nbsp;F Alconchel PhD ,&nbsp;JM Rodríguez PhD ,&nbsp;F Sánchez-Bueno ,&nbsp;P Ramírez ,&nbsp;B Febrero PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>The objective of this study was to develop and validate 6 checklists for evaluating abdominal pain in clinical simulation scenarios; to assess student competencies in managing 6 clinical cases using OSCE, based on faculty evaluations; and to analyze discrepancies between faculty and student evaluations.</p></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><p>A practical workshop was designed to address 6 clinical scenarios of abdominal surgical conditions. Four scenarios employed medium fidelity simulators, while 2 scenarios employed standardized patient methodology. Prior to the workshop, students received theoretical audiovisual material. At the conclusion of the workshop, students were evaluated using checklists that assessed communication, privacy, anamnesis, and technical skills. Ten workshops were conducted over 3 years, using the OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) format for evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><p>In the statistical analysis, t-Student tests or ANOVA were employed to ascertain whether there were any significant differences between the groups. In the process of validating checklists for clinical scenarios, 6 experts were asked to evaluate each item on a scale of 1 to 9. To assess the degree of agreement among experts, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was employed.</p></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANTS</h3><p>The study involved a total of 670 third-year medical students from the University of Murcia (UMU), Spain, who participated in the subject \\\"Medical-Surgical Skills.\\\"</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>High levels of appropriateness were observed for the checklist items, with mean scores above 7.5 points, as well as high levels of inter-expert agreement. Students obtained a mean score of 8 points in the evaluation of each clinical scenario. No significant differences were found between faculty and student scores (p &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>The learning method focused on clinical scenarios of abdominal surgical diseases effectively enhanced the clinical skills of third-year medical students. It used pre-existing audiovisual materials, hands-on workshops with medium-fidelity simulators, and standardized patients. Consistent evaluations from students and faculty confirmed the efficacy of these strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":\"81 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1756-1763\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193172042400391X/pdfft?md5=a0834c6283947dbd2aade95137c7ecae&pid=1-s2.0-S193172042400391X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193172042400391X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193172042400391X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在开发和验证临床模拟场景中评估腹痛的 6 个检查表;根据教师的评价,使用 OSCE 评估学生管理 6 个临床病例的能力;分析教师和学生评价之间的差异。DESIGNA 实践研讨会设计了 6 个临床腹部外科病症情景,其中 4 个情景采用了中等逼真度模拟器,2 个情景采用了标准化病人方法。研讨会前,学生们收到了理论视听材料。研讨会结束后,使用检查表对学生进行评估,评估内容包括沟通、隐私、肛门指诊和技术技能。在 3 年时间里,共举办了 10 期工作坊,采用 OSCE(客观结构化临床考试)形式进行评估。在统计分析中,采用 t-Student 检验或方差分析来确定组间是否存在显著差异。在验证临床情景核对表的过程中,要求 6 位专家对每个项目进行评价,评分标准为 1 至 9 分。为了评估专家之间的一致程度,采用了类内相关系数(ICC)。研究对象西班牙穆尔西亚大学(UMU)的 670 名三年级医学生参加了 "内外科技能 "科目的研究。学生对每个临床情景的评价平均得分为 8 分。结论以腹部外科疾病临床情景为重点的学习方法有效提高了三年级医学生的临床技能。它使用了已有的视听材料、中度仿真模拟器和标准化病人。学生和教师的一致评价证实了这些策略的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of Checklists and Evaluation of Clinical Skills in Cases of Abdominal Pain With Simulation in Formative, Objective, Structured Clinical Examination With Audiovisual Content in Third-Year Medical Students' Surgical Clerkship

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to develop and validate 6 checklists for evaluating abdominal pain in clinical simulation scenarios; to assess student competencies in managing 6 clinical cases using OSCE, based on faculty evaluations; and to analyze discrepancies between faculty and student evaluations.

DESIGN

A practical workshop was designed to address 6 clinical scenarios of abdominal surgical conditions. Four scenarios employed medium fidelity simulators, while 2 scenarios employed standardized patient methodology. Prior to the workshop, students received theoretical audiovisual material. At the conclusion of the workshop, students were evaluated using checklists that assessed communication, privacy, anamnesis, and technical skills. Ten workshops were conducted over 3 years, using the OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) format for evaluation.

SETTING

In the statistical analysis, t-Student tests or ANOVA were employed to ascertain whether there were any significant differences between the groups. In the process of validating checklists for clinical scenarios, 6 experts were asked to evaluate each item on a scale of 1 to 9. To assess the degree of agreement among experts, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was employed.

PARTICIPANTS

The study involved a total of 670 third-year medical students from the University of Murcia (UMU), Spain, who participated in the subject "Medical-Surgical Skills."

RESULTS

High levels of appropriateness were observed for the checklist items, with mean scores above 7.5 points, as well as high levels of inter-expert agreement. Students obtained a mean score of 8 points in the evaluation of each clinical scenario. No significant differences were found between faculty and student scores (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The learning method focused on clinical scenarios of abdominal surgical diseases effectively enhanced the clinical skills of third-year medical students. It used pre-existing audiovisual materials, hands-on workshops with medium-fidelity simulators, and standardized patients. Consistent evaluations from students and faculty confirmed the efficacy of these strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信