百花齐放实现语言评估素养范式的共存

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
{"title":"百花齐放实现语言评估素养范式的共存","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Language assessment literacy, an evolving and dynamic research field, assumes a critical role in applied linguistics. This narrative review analyzes different epistemological understandings regarding language assessment literacy. Guided by the three cognitive interests as defined by Jürgen Habermas, the article illustrates the characteristics of three paradigms of language assessment literacy: language assessment literacy as a product from the technical perspective, as a process from the practical perspective, and as a praxis from the critical perspective. The advantages and drawbacks of each paradigm are also discussed. By analysing language assessment literacy through the lens of these cognitive interests, we offer insights into how the scope of language assessment literacy can be broadened and how a critical perspective can initiate democratic discussions on under-explored issues in this research field. Also, we argue that it is crucial for academics in applied linguistics to be open-minded about the coexistence of different paradigms, as this can lead to significant contributions to language education and language assessment policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let a hundred flowers bloom: Towards a coexistence of paradigms in language assessment literacy\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Language assessment literacy, an evolving and dynamic research field, assumes a critical role in applied linguistics. This narrative review analyzes different epistemological understandings regarding language assessment literacy. Guided by the three cognitive interests as defined by Jürgen Habermas, the article illustrates the characteristics of three paradigms of language assessment literacy: language assessment literacy as a product from the technical perspective, as a process from the practical perspective, and as a praxis from the critical perspective. The advantages and drawbacks of each paradigm are also discussed. By analysing language assessment literacy through the lens of these cognitive interests, we offer insights into how the scope of language assessment literacy can be broadened and how a critical perspective can initiate democratic discussions on under-explored issues in this research field. Also, we argue that it is crucial for academics in applied linguistics to be open-minded about the coexistence of different paradigms, as this can lead to significant contributions to language education and language assessment policies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589824000792\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589824000792","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语言评估素养是一个不断发展、充满活力的研究领域,在应用语言学中发挥着至关重要的作用。这篇叙述性评论分析了有关语言评估素养的不同认识论理解。文章以尤尔根-哈贝马斯(Jürgen Habermas)定义的三种认知旨趣为指导,阐述了语言评估素养的三种范式的特点:从技术角度看,语言评估素养是一种产品;从实践角度看,语言评估素养是一种过程;从批判角度看,语言评估素养是一种实践。此外,还讨论了每种范式的优缺点。通过从这些认知兴趣的角度分析语言评估素养,我们对如何扩大语言评估素养的范围,以及批判性视角如何就这一研究领域未充分探索的问题发起民主讨论提出了见解。此外,我们还认为,应用语言学领域的学者必须对不同范式的共存持开放态度,因为这可以为语言教育和语言评估政策做出重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Let a hundred flowers bloom: Towards a coexistence of paradigms in language assessment literacy

Language assessment literacy, an evolving and dynamic research field, assumes a critical role in applied linguistics. This narrative review analyzes different epistemological understandings regarding language assessment literacy. Guided by the three cognitive interests as defined by Jürgen Habermas, the article illustrates the characteristics of three paradigms of language assessment literacy: language assessment literacy as a product from the technical perspective, as a process from the practical perspective, and as a praxis from the critical perspective. The advantages and drawbacks of each paradigm are also discussed. By analysing language assessment literacy through the lens of these cognitive interests, we offer insights into how the scope of language assessment literacy can be broadened and how a critical perspective can initiate democratic discussions on under-explored issues in this research field. Also, we argue that it is crucial for academics in applied linguistics to be open-minded about the coexistence of different paradigms, as this can lead to significant contributions to language education and language assessment policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Linguistics and Education encourages submissions that apply theory and method from all areas of linguistics to the study of education. Areas of linguistic study include, but are not limited to: text/corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, functional grammar, discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, conversational analysis, linguistic anthropology/ethnography, language acquisition, language socialization, narrative studies, gesture/ sign /visual forms of communication, cognitive linguistics, literacy studies, language policy, and language ideology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信