Al/Cr-Kα X 射线光发射仪器的强度-能量响应函数:实验室间研究

IF 1.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 SPECTROSCOPY
David Alamarguy , Damien Aureau , Thierry Conard , Nicolas Gauthier , Frédéric Georgi , Stéphane Guilet , Samar Hajjar-Garreau , Olivier Heintz , Guillaume Monier , Christophe Méthivier , Hervé Montigaud , Samantha Soulé , Olivier Renault , Rémi Lazzari
{"title":"Al/Cr-Kα X 射线光发射仪器的强度-能量响应函数:实验室间研究","authors":"David Alamarguy ,&nbsp;Damien Aureau ,&nbsp;Thierry Conard ,&nbsp;Nicolas Gauthier ,&nbsp;Frédéric Georgi ,&nbsp;Stéphane Guilet ,&nbsp;Samar Hajjar-Garreau ,&nbsp;Olivier Heintz ,&nbsp;Guillaume Monier ,&nbsp;Christophe Méthivier ,&nbsp;Hervé Montigaud ,&nbsp;Samantha Soulé ,&nbsp;Olivier Renault ,&nbsp;Rémi Lazzari","doi":"10.1016/j.elspec.2024.147486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The question of the intensity-energy response of photoemission spectrometers has been approached through a round-robin involving 13 instruments working with low (Al/Mg-K<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>) and high (Cr-K<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>) energy photon sources. An algorithm based on the analysis of inelastic background previously proposed [S. Guilet et al., J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 285 (2022) 147225)] was intensively tested against calibrated Al/Mg-K<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span> instruments and calculated relative sensitivity factors (RSFs) over the 15 core level peaks of coinage metals (Ag, Au, Cu). In both cases, the linear correlation within <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>10</mn></mrow></math></span> %, over two orders of magnitude in intensity and for kinetic energies ranging from <span><math><mrow><mo>∼</mo><mn>400</mn></mrow></math></span> to <span><math><mrow><mspace></mspace><mn>1400</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>eV</mi></mrow></math></span>, showed the consistency of the approach. All the contributions to RSFs (<em>e.g.</em> non-dipolar terms in the photo-ionization cross section, elastic scattering effects, surface excitations, beam polarization by the monochromator) were critically reviewed and taken into account using the state-of-the-art modellings and databases. Strong variations were evidenced among instruments, regarding not only the response functions, but also the theoretical RSFs due to different measurement geometries. For the Cr-K<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span> hard x-ray instruments, the same analysis was performed with a set of different materials (Al, Si, Ge, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Nb, Mo, Ag, W, Au). A <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>10</mn></mrow></math></span> % satisfactory agreement against theoretical RSFs over 69 core levels spanning a large kinetic energy range (300–4000 eV) could be achieved with a common response function. Despite limitations that are reviewed, this work opens interesting perspectives for a systematic calibration of photoemission instruments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15726,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena","volume":"276 ","pages":"Article 147486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensity-energy response function of Al/Cr-Kα x-ray photoemission instruments: An inter-laboratory study\",\"authors\":\"David Alamarguy ,&nbsp;Damien Aureau ,&nbsp;Thierry Conard ,&nbsp;Nicolas Gauthier ,&nbsp;Frédéric Georgi ,&nbsp;Stéphane Guilet ,&nbsp;Samar Hajjar-Garreau ,&nbsp;Olivier Heintz ,&nbsp;Guillaume Monier ,&nbsp;Christophe Méthivier ,&nbsp;Hervé Montigaud ,&nbsp;Samantha Soulé ,&nbsp;Olivier Renault ,&nbsp;Rémi Lazzari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.elspec.2024.147486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The question of the intensity-energy response of photoemission spectrometers has been approached through a round-robin involving 13 instruments working with low (Al/Mg-K<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>) and high (Cr-K<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>) energy photon sources. An algorithm based on the analysis of inelastic background previously proposed [S. Guilet et al., J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 285 (2022) 147225)] was intensively tested against calibrated Al/Mg-K<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span> instruments and calculated relative sensitivity factors (RSFs) over the 15 core level peaks of coinage metals (Ag, Au, Cu). In both cases, the linear correlation within <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>10</mn></mrow></math></span> %, over two orders of magnitude in intensity and for kinetic energies ranging from <span><math><mrow><mo>∼</mo><mn>400</mn></mrow></math></span> to <span><math><mrow><mspace></mspace><mn>1400</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>eV</mi></mrow></math></span>, showed the consistency of the approach. All the contributions to RSFs (<em>e.g.</em> non-dipolar terms in the photo-ionization cross section, elastic scattering effects, surface excitations, beam polarization by the monochromator) were critically reviewed and taken into account using the state-of-the-art modellings and databases. Strong variations were evidenced among instruments, regarding not only the response functions, but also the theoretical RSFs due to different measurement geometries. For the Cr-K<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span> hard x-ray instruments, the same analysis was performed with a set of different materials (Al, Si, Ge, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Nb, Mo, Ag, W, Au). A <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>10</mn></mrow></math></span> % satisfactory agreement against theoretical RSFs over 69 core levels spanning a large kinetic energy range (300–4000 eV) could be achieved with a common response function. Despite limitations that are reviewed, this work opens interesting perspectives for a systematic calibration of photoemission instruments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena\",\"volume\":\"276 \",\"pages\":\"Article 147486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0368204824000690\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPECTROSCOPY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0368204824000690","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPECTROSCOPY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

光发射光谱仪的强度-能量响应问题是通过使用低能量(Al/Mg-Kα)和高能量(Cr-Kα)光子源的 13 台仪器进行循环来解决的。根据之前提出的非弹性背景分析算法[S. Guilet 等人,J. Electron Spectrosc.在这两种情况下,对于两个数量级的强度和 400 至 1400eV 的动能,线性相关都在±10%以内,这表明了该方法的一致性。对 RSFs 的所有贡献(例如光电离截面中的非双极性项、弹性散射效应、表面激发、单色器的光束偏振)都进行了严格审查,并利用最先进的建模和数据库将其考虑在内。由于测量几何结构不同,仪器之间不仅在响应函数方面,而且在理论 RSF 方面都存在很大差异。对于 Cr-Kα 硬 X 射线仪器,使用一组不同的材料(Al、Si、Ge、Fe、Co、Ni、Cu、Zn、Nb、Mo、Ag、W、Au)进行了相同的分析。通过使用一个通用响应函数,69 个核心水平(动能范围为 300-4000 eV)与理论 RSF 达到了 ±10 % 的满意一致。尽管还存在一些局限性,但这项工作为系统校准光发射仪器开辟了有趣的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intensity-energy response function of Al/Cr-Kα x-ray photoemission instruments: An inter-laboratory study

The question of the intensity-energy response of photoemission spectrometers has been approached through a round-robin involving 13 instruments working with low (Al/Mg-Kα) and high (Cr-Kα) energy photon sources. An algorithm based on the analysis of inelastic background previously proposed [S. Guilet et al., J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 285 (2022) 147225)] was intensively tested against calibrated Al/Mg-Kα instruments and calculated relative sensitivity factors (RSFs) over the 15 core level peaks of coinage metals (Ag, Au, Cu). In both cases, the linear correlation within ±10 %, over two orders of magnitude in intensity and for kinetic energies ranging from 400 to 1400eV, showed the consistency of the approach. All the contributions to RSFs (e.g. non-dipolar terms in the photo-ionization cross section, elastic scattering effects, surface excitations, beam polarization by the monochromator) were critically reviewed and taken into account using the state-of-the-art modellings and databases. Strong variations were evidenced among instruments, regarding not only the response functions, but also the theoretical RSFs due to different measurement geometries. For the Cr-Kα hard x-ray instruments, the same analysis was performed with a set of different materials (Al, Si, Ge, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Nb, Mo, Ag, W, Au). A ±10 % satisfactory agreement against theoretical RSFs over 69 core levels spanning a large kinetic energy range (300–4000 eV) could be achieved with a common response function. Despite limitations that are reviewed, this work opens interesting perspectives for a systematic calibration of photoemission instruments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena publishes experimental, theoretical and applied work in the field of electron spectroscopy and electronic structure, involving techniques which use high energy photons (>10 eV) or electrons as probes or detected particles in the investigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信