{"title":"你为什么不给我打电话?初级学员在决定是否给主管打电话时考虑的因素","authors":"Kameela Miriam Alibhai MD , Taryn Raelene Zabolotniuk MD , Isabelle Raîche MD, MAEd, FRCSC , Nada Gawad MD, MAEd, FRCSC","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>Over half of junior learners (JL) feel pressure to work independently and report rarely calling their supervisor. It is unclear how JL decide whether or not to call their supervisor. The study aims to identify factors that JL consider when responding to clinical scenarios and deciding whether to call senior residents (SR) and compare them to factors identified by SR.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Fifteen cognitive interviews were conducted with SR and JL. Participants were given 8 to 15 sample pages and probed regarding the factors they considered when triaging the page and deciding whether to inform a SR. De-identified interview transcripts were inductively coded using an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach.</p></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><p>Department of Surgery, Faculty of medicine at the University of Ottawa in Canada.</p></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANT</h3><p>Five general surgery SR and ten JL, which included 5 senior medical students and 5 general surgery junior residents.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>JL and SR indicated a clear need to call SR when managing high acuity pages, which included hemodynamic instability, decreased level of consciousness, or codes (ie, trauma, cardiac arrest). In the absence of high acuity findings, JL judged whether to call SR based on 10 patient and learner-related factors. Patient-related factors include: 1) time since surgery, 2) patient appearance, 3) patient requires intervention, and 4) lack of improvement after initial independent management attempt. Learner-related factors were categorized into clinical (5-8) and social factors (9-10): 5) nurse's level of concern, 6) familiarity with the patient, 7) gut feeling, 8) prior experience managing this presentation, 9) time of day, and 10) interpersonal dynamic with SR. While SR identified all patient-related and clinical factors, they did not cite the 2 social factors JL considered.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>When pages lack high-acuity findings, JL consider various patient and learner factors when deciding whether to inform SR. Discussing these factors may help guide new JL regarding when they should call their supervisor. Understanding social factors is important to create a culture that minimizes their influence on JL's decision-making and promotes patient safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"81 11","pages":"Pages 1637-1644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193172042400388X/pdfft?md5=ac7dd5298611b424c0ca5b7576a96e98&pid=1-s2.0-S193172042400388X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Didn't You Call Me? Factors Junior Learners Consider When Deciding Whether to Call Their Supervisor\",\"authors\":\"Kameela Miriam Alibhai MD , Taryn Raelene Zabolotniuk MD , Isabelle Raîche MD, MAEd, FRCSC , Nada Gawad MD, MAEd, FRCSC\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>Over half of junior learners (JL) feel pressure to work independently and report rarely calling their supervisor. It is unclear how JL decide whether or not to call their supervisor. The study aims to identify factors that JL consider when responding to clinical scenarios and deciding whether to call senior residents (SR) and compare them to factors identified by SR.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Fifteen cognitive interviews were conducted with SR and JL. Participants were given 8 to 15 sample pages and probed regarding the factors they considered when triaging the page and deciding whether to inform a SR. De-identified interview transcripts were inductively coded using an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach.</p></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><p>Department of Surgery, Faculty of medicine at the University of Ottawa in Canada.</p></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANT</h3><p>Five general surgery SR and ten JL, which included 5 senior medical students and 5 general surgery junior residents.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>JL and SR indicated a clear need to call SR when managing high acuity pages, which included hemodynamic instability, decreased level of consciousness, or codes (ie, trauma, cardiac arrest). In the absence of high acuity findings, JL judged whether to call SR based on 10 patient and learner-related factors. Patient-related factors include: 1) time since surgery, 2) patient appearance, 3) patient requires intervention, and 4) lack of improvement after initial independent management attempt. Learner-related factors were categorized into clinical (5-8) and social factors (9-10): 5) nurse's level of concern, 6) familiarity with the patient, 7) gut feeling, 8) prior experience managing this presentation, 9) time of day, and 10) interpersonal dynamic with SR. While SR identified all patient-related and clinical factors, they did not cite the 2 social factors JL considered.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>When pages lack high-acuity findings, JL consider various patient and learner factors when deciding whether to inform SR. Discussing these factors may help guide new JL regarding when they should call their supervisor. Understanding social factors is important to create a culture that minimizes their influence on JL's decision-making and promotes patient safety.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":\"81 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1637-1644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193172042400388X/pdfft?md5=ac7dd5298611b424c0ca5b7576a96e98&pid=1-s2.0-S193172042400388X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193172042400388X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193172042400388X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Why Didn't You Call Me? Factors Junior Learners Consider When Deciding Whether to Call Their Supervisor
OBJECTIVE
Over half of junior learners (JL) feel pressure to work independently and report rarely calling their supervisor. It is unclear how JL decide whether or not to call their supervisor. The study aims to identify factors that JL consider when responding to clinical scenarios and deciding whether to call senior residents (SR) and compare them to factors identified by SR.
METHODS
Fifteen cognitive interviews were conducted with SR and JL. Participants were given 8 to 15 sample pages and probed regarding the factors they considered when triaging the page and deciding whether to inform a SR. De-identified interview transcripts were inductively coded using an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach.
SETTING
Department of Surgery, Faculty of medicine at the University of Ottawa in Canada.
PARTICIPANT
Five general surgery SR and ten JL, which included 5 senior medical students and 5 general surgery junior residents.
RESULTS
JL and SR indicated a clear need to call SR when managing high acuity pages, which included hemodynamic instability, decreased level of consciousness, or codes (ie, trauma, cardiac arrest). In the absence of high acuity findings, JL judged whether to call SR based on 10 patient and learner-related factors. Patient-related factors include: 1) time since surgery, 2) patient appearance, 3) patient requires intervention, and 4) lack of improvement after initial independent management attempt. Learner-related factors were categorized into clinical (5-8) and social factors (9-10): 5) nurse's level of concern, 6) familiarity with the patient, 7) gut feeling, 8) prior experience managing this presentation, 9) time of day, and 10) interpersonal dynamic with SR. While SR identified all patient-related and clinical factors, they did not cite the 2 social factors JL considered.
CONCLUSION
When pages lack high-acuity findings, JL consider various patient and learner factors when deciding whether to inform SR. Discussing these factors may help guide new JL regarding when they should call their supervisor. Understanding social factors is important to create a culture that minimizes their influence on JL's decision-making and promotes patient safety.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.