你为什么不给我打电话?初级学员在决定是否给主管打电话时考虑的因素

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
{"title":"你为什么不给我打电话?初级学员在决定是否给主管打电话时考虑的因素","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>Over half of junior learners (JL) feel pressure to work independently and report rarely calling their supervisor. It is unclear how JL decide whether or not to call their supervisor. The study aims to identify factors that JL consider when responding to clinical scenarios and deciding whether to call senior residents (SR) and compare them to factors identified by SR.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Fifteen cognitive interviews were conducted with SR and JL. Participants were given 8 to 15 sample pages and probed regarding the factors they considered when triaging the page and deciding whether to inform a SR. De-identified interview transcripts were inductively coded using an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach.</p></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><p>Department of Surgery, Faculty of medicine at the University of Ottawa in Canada.</p></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANT</h3><p>Five general surgery SR and ten JL, which included 5 senior medical students and 5 general surgery junior residents.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>JL and SR indicated a clear need to call SR when managing high acuity pages, which included hemodynamic instability, decreased level of consciousness, or codes (ie, trauma, cardiac arrest). In the absence of high acuity findings, JL judged whether to call SR based on 10 patient and learner-related factors. Patient-related factors include: 1) time since surgery, 2) patient appearance, 3) patient requires intervention, and 4) lack of improvement after initial independent management attempt. Learner-related factors were categorized into clinical (5-8) and social factors (9-10): 5) nurse's level of concern, 6) familiarity with the patient, 7) gut feeling, 8) prior experience managing this presentation, 9) time of day, and 10) interpersonal dynamic with SR. While SR identified all patient-related and clinical factors, they did not cite the 2 social factors JL considered.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>When pages lack high-acuity findings, JL consider various patient and learner factors when deciding whether to inform SR. Discussing these factors may help guide new JL regarding when they should call their supervisor. Understanding social factors is important to create a culture that minimizes their influence on JL's decision-making and promotes patient safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193172042400388X/pdfft?md5=ac7dd5298611b424c0ca5b7576a96e98&pid=1-s2.0-S193172042400388X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Didn't You Call Me? Factors Junior Learners Consider When Deciding Whether to Call Their Supervisor\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>Over half of junior learners (JL) feel pressure to work independently and report rarely calling their supervisor. It is unclear how JL decide whether or not to call their supervisor. The study aims to identify factors that JL consider when responding to clinical scenarios and deciding whether to call senior residents (SR) and compare them to factors identified by SR.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Fifteen cognitive interviews were conducted with SR and JL. Participants were given 8 to 15 sample pages and probed regarding the factors they considered when triaging the page and deciding whether to inform a SR. De-identified interview transcripts were inductively coded using an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach.</p></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><p>Department of Surgery, Faculty of medicine at the University of Ottawa in Canada.</p></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANT</h3><p>Five general surgery SR and ten JL, which included 5 senior medical students and 5 general surgery junior residents.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>JL and SR indicated a clear need to call SR when managing high acuity pages, which included hemodynamic instability, decreased level of consciousness, or codes (ie, trauma, cardiac arrest). In the absence of high acuity findings, JL judged whether to call SR based on 10 patient and learner-related factors. Patient-related factors include: 1) time since surgery, 2) patient appearance, 3) patient requires intervention, and 4) lack of improvement after initial independent management attempt. Learner-related factors were categorized into clinical (5-8) and social factors (9-10): 5) nurse's level of concern, 6) familiarity with the patient, 7) gut feeling, 8) prior experience managing this presentation, 9) time of day, and 10) interpersonal dynamic with SR. While SR identified all patient-related and clinical factors, they did not cite the 2 social factors JL considered.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>When pages lack high-acuity findings, JL consider various patient and learner factors when deciding whether to inform SR. Discussing these factors may help guide new JL regarding when they should call their supervisor. Understanding social factors is important to create a culture that minimizes their influence on JL's decision-making and promotes patient safety.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193172042400388X/pdfft?md5=ac7dd5298611b424c0ca5b7576a96e98&pid=1-s2.0-S193172042400388X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193172042400388X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193172042400388X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 半数以上的初级学员(JL)感到有独立工作的压力,并表示很少给他们的主管打电话。目前尚不清楚初级学员如何决定是否给导师打电话。本研究旨在确定初级学员在应对临床情景和决定是否致电资深住院医师(SR)时所考虑的因素,并将这些因素与资深住院医师所确定的因素进行比较。方法对资深住院医师和初级学员进行了 15 次认知访谈。向参与者提供了 8 至 15 页样本,并询问他们在分流页面和决定是否通知 SR 时所考虑的因素。采用解释性现象学分析 (IPA) 方法对去身份化的访谈记录进行归纳编码。结果JL 和 SR 表示,在处理高危页面(包括血流动力学不稳定、意识水平下降或代码(即外伤、心脏骤停))时,显然需要呼叫 SR。在没有发现高危情况的情况下,JL 根据 10 个与患者和学员相关的因素来判断是否呼叫 SR。患者相关因素包括1) 手术后时间;2) 患者外观;3) 患者需要干预;4) 首次尝试独立处理后病情未见好转。学习者相关因素分为临床因素(5-8)和社会因素(9-10):5) 护士的关注程度;6) 对病人的熟悉程度;7) 直觉;8) 以前处理这种表现的经验;9) 一天中的时间;10) 与 SR 的人际关系动态。虽然 SR 识别了所有患者相关因素和临床因素,但他们没有引用 JL 考虑的 2 个社会因素。讨论这些因素可能有助于指导新的 JL,让他们知道何时应该给主管打电话。了解社会因素对于创建一种文化非常重要,这种文化可以最大限度地减少社会因素对 JL 决策的影响,并促进患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Didn't You Call Me? Factors Junior Learners Consider When Deciding Whether to Call Their Supervisor

OBJECTIVE

Over half of junior learners (JL) feel pressure to work independently and report rarely calling their supervisor. It is unclear how JL decide whether or not to call their supervisor. The study aims to identify factors that JL consider when responding to clinical scenarios and deciding whether to call senior residents (SR) and compare them to factors identified by SR.

METHODS

Fifteen cognitive interviews were conducted with SR and JL. Participants were given 8 to 15 sample pages and probed regarding the factors they considered when triaging the page and deciding whether to inform a SR. De-identified interview transcripts were inductively coded using an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach.

SETTING

Department of Surgery, Faculty of medicine at the University of Ottawa in Canada.

PARTICIPANT

Five general surgery SR and ten JL, which included 5 senior medical students and 5 general surgery junior residents.

RESULTS

JL and SR indicated a clear need to call SR when managing high acuity pages, which included hemodynamic instability, decreased level of consciousness, or codes (ie, trauma, cardiac arrest). In the absence of high acuity findings, JL judged whether to call SR based on 10 patient and learner-related factors. Patient-related factors include: 1) time since surgery, 2) patient appearance, 3) patient requires intervention, and 4) lack of improvement after initial independent management attempt. Learner-related factors were categorized into clinical (5-8) and social factors (9-10): 5) nurse's level of concern, 6) familiarity with the patient, 7) gut feeling, 8) prior experience managing this presentation, 9) time of day, and 10) interpersonal dynamic with SR. While SR identified all patient-related and clinical factors, they did not cite the 2 social factors JL considered.

CONCLUSION

When pages lack high-acuity findings, JL consider various patient and learner factors when deciding whether to inform SR. Discussing these factors may help guide new JL regarding when they should call their supervisor. Understanding social factors is important to create a culture that minimizes their influence on JL's decision-making and promotes patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信