采用不同液化对策对可液化土壤中的钢板桩码头进行抗震评估

IF 5.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
{"title":"采用不同液化对策对可液化土壤中的钢板桩码头进行抗震评估","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Seismic resilience assessment is essential for maintaining the functionality of sheet-pile wharves in liquefiable soils, preventing significant damages and minimizing losses during earthquakes. This study delves into the seismic resilience of sheet-pile wharves, focusing specifically on the effectiveness of four different liquefaction countermeasure techniques: anchor lengths, cement deep mixing, stone columns, and soil compaction. As such, an advanced two-dimensional (2D) Finite Element (FE) computational framework is established, motivated by a typical large-scale sheet-pile wharf configuration. Within this framework, a recently developed multi-yield surfaces plasticity model is employed, with the modeling parameters calibrated through undrained stress-controlled cyclic triaxial tests and a centrifuge test. Subsequently, the impacts of these liquefaction countermeasures on the seismic resilience of the sheet-pile wharves are systematically investigated. Additionally, the effectiveness of combining longer anchor lengths with the other three mitigation techniques to enhance the seismic resilience of the sheet-pile wharves are examined. It is demonstrated that the synergistic effects of different liquefaction countermeasures can further reduce the liquefaction potential, thereby improving the seismic resilience. Overall, the FE analysis technique and the resulting insights are highly significant for the seismic resilience assessment of equivalent sheet-pile wharves in liquefiable soils, particularly when implementing such liquefaction mitigation countermeasures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55217,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Geotechnics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic resilience assessment of sheet-pile wharves in liquefiable soils using different liquefaction countermeasures\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Seismic resilience assessment is essential for maintaining the functionality of sheet-pile wharves in liquefiable soils, preventing significant damages and minimizing losses during earthquakes. This study delves into the seismic resilience of sheet-pile wharves, focusing specifically on the effectiveness of four different liquefaction countermeasure techniques: anchor lengths, cement deep mixing, stone columns, and soil compaction. As such, an advanced two-dimensional (2D) Finite Element (FE) computational framework is established, motivated by a typical large-scale sheet-pile wharf configuration. Within this framework, a recently developed multi-yield surfaces plasticity model is employed, with the modeling parameters calibrated through undrained stress-controlled cyclic triaxial tests and a centrifuge test. Subsequently, the impacts of these liquefaction countermeasures on the seismic resilience of the sheet-pile wharves are systematically investigated. Additionally, the effectiveness of combining longer anchor lengths with the other three mitigation techniques to enhance the seismic resilience of the sheet-pile wharves are examined. It is demonstrated that the synergistic effects of different liquefaction countermeasures can further reduce the liquefaction potential, thereby improving the seismic resilience. Overall, the FE analysis technique and the resulting insights are highly significant for the seismic resilience assessment of equivalent sheet-pile wharves in liquefiable soils, particularly when implementing such liquefaction mitigation countermeasures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Geotechnics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Geotechnics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266352X2400689X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266352X2400689X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗震性评估对于在可液化土壤中保持钢板桩码头的功能性、防止地震中的重大破坏并将损失降至最低至关重要。本研究深入探讨了钢板桩码头的抗震能力,特别关注四种不同液化对策技术的有效性:锚杆长度、水泥深层搅拌、石柱和土壤压实。因此,以典型的大型钢板桩码头配置为动机,建立了先进的二维(2D)有限元(FE)计算框架。在此框架内,采用了最近开发的多屈服面塑性模型,并通过不排水应力控制循环三轴试验和离心试验校准了模型参数。随后,系统地研究了这些液化对策对钢板桩码头抗震能力的影响。此外,还研究了将较长的锚固长度与其他三种缓解技术相结合以提高钢板桩码头抗震能力的有效性。结果表明,不同液化对策的协同效应可进一步降低液化潜势,从而提高抗震能力。总之,有限元分析技术和由此得出的见解对于可液化土壤中等效钢板桩码头的抗震性评估意义重大,尤其是在实施此类液化缓解对策时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seismic resilience assessment of sheet-pile wharves in liquefiable soils using different liquefaction countermeasures

Seismic resilience assessment is essential for maintaining the functionality of sheet-pile wharves in liquefiable soils, preventing significant damages and minimizing losses during earthquakes. This study delves into the seismic resilience of sheet-pile wharves, focusing specifically on the effectiveness of four different liquefaction countermeasure techniques: anchor lengths, cement deep mixing, stone columns, and soil compaction. As such, an advanced two-dimensional (2D) Finite Element (FE) computational framework is established, motivated by a typical large-scale sheet-pile wharf configuration. Within this framework, a recently developed multi-yield surfaces plasticity model is employed, with the modeling parameters calibrated through undrained stress-controlled cyclic triaxial tests and a centrifuge test. Subsequently, the impacts of these liquefaction countermeasures on the seismic resilience of the sheet-pile wharves are systematically investigated. Additionally, the effectiveness of combining longer anchor lengths with the other three mitigation techniques to enhance the seismic resilience of the sheet-pile wharves are examined. It is demonstrated that the synergistic effects of different liquefaction countermeasures can further reduce the liquefaction potential, thereby improving the seismic resilience. Overall, the FE analysis technique and the resulting insights are highly significant for the seismic resilience assessment of equivalent sheet-pile wharves in liquefiable soils, particularly when implementing such liquefaction mitigation countermeasures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Geotechnics
Computers and Geotechnics 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
15.10%
发文量
438
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The use of computers is firmly established in geotechnical engineering and continues to grow rapidly in both engineering practice and academe. The development of advanced numerical techniques and constitutive modeling, in conjunction with rapid developments in computer hardware, enables problems to be tackled that were unthinkable even a few years ago. Computers and Geotechnics provides an up-to-date reference for engineers and researchers engaged in computer aided analysis and research in geotechnical engineering. The journal is intended for an expeditious dissemination of advanced computer applications across a broad range of geotechnical topics. Contributions on advances in numerical algorithms, computer implementation of new constitutive models and probabilistic methods are especially encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信