管理团队类别、社交网络特征和企业信贷风险

IF 7.5 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Tsung-Kang Chen, Yijie Tseng, Yun Hao
{"title":"管理团队类别、社交网络特征和企业信贷风险","authors":"Tsung-Kang Chen, Yijie Tseng, Yun Hao","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the association between the social networks of management team (AMT) and corporate credit risk using American corporate bond market data. We find that the social network size of AMT is significantly and positively related to corporate bond yield spreads, consistent with the risk-taking mechanism. In addition, the relative social networks of AMT to CEO and subordinate executives to CEO are significantly and positively related to bond yield spreads while that of middle managers to CEO have the opposite association. This implies that relatively greater social networks of subordinate executives could potentially influence the CEO to undertake greater risks, whereas relatively greater social networks of middle managers reduce corporate credit risk mainly through the information-sharing mechanism rather than the risk-taking effect since MM has no direct decision-making authority. Moreover, the variations in social networks among AMT are positively associated with corporate bond yield spreads, suggesting that an inequitable distribution of power among AMT members increases corporate credit risk. Additionally, we find that non-invesment-grade bonds, managerial entrenchment, information asymmetry, and overinvestment all intensify the positive association between AMT social networks and credit risk, namely enhancing the bondholders’ perceptions about the risk-taking mechanism of AMT social networks. Finally, our findings are robust after considering endogeneity concerns and alternative model settings.","PeriodicalId":48290,"journal":{"name":"European Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management team categories, social network characteristics, and corporate credit risk\",\"authors\":\"Tsung-Kang Chen, Yijie Tseng, Yun Hao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.emj.2024.08.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate the association between the social networks of management team (AMT) and corporate credit risk using American corporate bond market data. We find that the social network size of AMT is significantly and positively related to corporate bond yield spreads, consistent with the risk-taking mechanism. In addition, the relative social networks of AMT to CEO and subordinate executives to CEO are significantly and positively related to bond yield spreads while that of middle managers to CEO have the opposite association. This implies that relatively greater social networks of subordinate executives could potentially influence the CEO to undertake greater risks, whereas relatively greater social networks of middle managers reduce corporate credit risk mainly through the information-sharing mechanism rather than the risk-taking effect since MM has no direct decision-making authority. Moreover, the variations in social networks among AMT are positively associated with corporate bond yield spreads, suggesting that an inequitable distribution of power among AMT members increases corporate credit risk. Additionally, we find that non-invesment-grade bonds, managerial entrenchment, information asymmetry, and overinvestment all intensify the positive association between AMT social networks and credit risk, namely enhancing the bondholders’ perceptions about the risk-taking mechanism of AMT social networks. Finally, our findings are robust after considering endogeneity concerns and alternative model settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Management Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2024.08.009\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2024.08.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用美国公司债券市场数据研究了管理团队(AMT)的社交网络与公司信用风险之间的关联。我们发现,AMT 的社交网络规模与公司债券收益率利差显著正相关,这与风险承担机制相一致。此外,AMT 与 CEO 和下属高管与 CEO 的相对社交网络与债券收益率利差显著正相关,而中层管理人员与 CEO 的社交网络则相反。这意味着,下属高管的社会网络相对较大,有可能影响首席执行官承担更大的风险,而中层管理者的社会网络相对较大,主要通过信息共享机制而非风险承担效应来降低企业信贷风险,因为中层管理者没有直接的决策权。此外,AMT 之间社会网络的变化与公司债券收益率利差呈正相关,这表明 AMT 成员之间权力分配不公会增加公司信贷风险。此外,我们还发现,非投资级债券、管理阶层固化、信息不对称和过度投资都强化了 AMT 社会网络与信用风险之间的正相关,即增强了债券持有人对 AMT 社会网络风险承担机制的认知。最后,在考虑了内生性问题和其他模型设置后,我们的研究结果是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management team categories, social network characteristics, and corporate credit risk
We investigate the association between the social networks of management team (AMT) and corporate credit risk using American corporate bond market data. We find that the social network size of AMT is significantly and positively related to corporate bond yield spreads, consistent with the risk-taking mechanism. In addition, the relative social networks of AMT to CEO and subordinate executives to CEO are significantly and positively related to bond yield spreads while that of middle managers to CEO have the opposite association. This implies that relatively greater social networks of subordinate executives could potentially influence the CEO to undertake greater risks, whereas relatively greater social networks of middle managers reduce corporate credit risk mainly through the information-sharing mechanism rather than the risk-taking effect since MM has no direct decision-making authority. Moreover, the variations in social networks among AMT are positively associated with corporate bond yield spreads, suggesting that an inequitable distribution of power among AMT members increases corporate credit risk. Additionally, we find that non-invesment-grade bonds, managerial entrenchment, information asymmetry, and overinvestment all intensify the positive association between AMT social networks and credit risk, namely enhancing the bondholders’ perceptions about the risk-taking mechanism of AMT social networks. Finally, our findings are robust after considering endogeneity concerns and alternative model settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The European Management Journal (EMJ) stands as a premier scholarly publication, disseminating cutting-edge research spanning all realms of management. EMJ articles challenge conventional wisdom through rigorously informed empirical and theoretical inquiries, offering fresh insights and innovative perspectives on key management themes while remaining accessible and engaging for a wide readership. EMJ articles embody intellectual curiosity and embrace diverse methodological approaches, yielding contributions that significantly influence both management theory and practice. We actively seek interdisciplinary research that integrates distinct research traditions to illuminate contemporary challenges within the expansive domain of European business and management. We strongly encourage cross-cultural investigations addressing the unique challenges faced by European management scholarship and practice in navigating global issues and contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信