Julie P. Martin;Isabel Miller;Karin J. Jensen;Deepthi E. Suresh
{"title":"工程学研究启动计划(RIEF)资助的教师被指导者的社会网络分析","authors":"Julie P. Martin;Isabel Miller;Karin J. Jensen;Deepthi E. Suresh","doi":"10.1109/TE.2024.3436560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contribution: Our work focuses on building research capacity in engineering education research (EER). We operationalize enculturation of novice researchers into the EER community by studying temporal changes in the social networks of engineering faculty participating in a mentorship-based training grant. Background: The U.S. National Science Foundation’s Research Initiation in Engineering Formation (RIEF) is a training grant for engineering faculty without prior EER experience who seek to conduct EER. Faculty mentees work with an experienced social science researcher during a funded two-year project. During this time, mentees must undergo a paradigm shift from engineering research to social science, which includes building research skills and becoming enculturated into the EER community. Research Questions: What are the characteristics of RIEF mentees’ professional networks for EER? How do RIEF mentees’ networks change over time, as operationalized by professional interactions, communication about the RIEF project, and collaborations? Methodology: We use social network analysis to investigate the development of EER professional networks of RIEF mentees and their interactions with other community members during the first year of their research initiation training. Findings: Overall, mentees’ professional networks for EER increased (i.e., reported more connections) after one year. However, when mentors had limited prior connections to the EER community, their mentees’ social networks for EER are isolated compared to mentees whose mentors have a higher number of connections to community members. Our findings have implications for mentored training programs, suggesting that well-connected mentors are best placed to enculturate mentees into a research community.","PeriodicalId":55011,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Education","volume":"68 1","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10643030","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Social Network Analysis of Faculty Mentees Funded by the Research Initiation in Engineering Formation (RIEF) Program\",\"authors\":\"Julie P. Martin;Isabel Miller;Karin J. Jensen;Deepthi E. Suresh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TE.2024.3436560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contribution: Our work focuses on building research capacity in engineering education research (EER). We operationalize enculturation of novice researchers into the EER community by studying temporal changes in the social networks of engineering faculty participating in a mentorship-based training grant. Background: The U.S. National Science Foundation’s Research Initiation in Engineering Formation (RIEF) is a training grant for engineering faculty without prior EER experience who seek to conduct EER. Faculty mentees work with an experienced social science researcher during a funded two-year project. During this time, mentees must undergo a paradigm shift from engineering research to social science, which includes building research skills and becoming enculturated into the EER community. Research Questions: What are the characteristics of RIEF mentees’ professional networks for EER? How do RIEF mentees’ networks change over time, as operationalized by professional interactions, communication about the RIEF project, and collaborations? Methodology: We use social network analysis to investigate the development of EER professional networks of RIEF mentees and their interactions with other community members during the first year of their research initiation training. Findings: Overall, mentees’ professional networks for EER increased (i.e., reported more connections) after one year. However, when mentors had limited prior connections to the EER community, their mentees’ social networks for EER are isolated compared to mentees whose mentors have a higher number of connections to community members. Our findings have implications for mentored training programs, suggesting that well-connected mentors are best placed to enculturate mentees into a research community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Education\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"13-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10643030\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10643030/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10643030/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Social Network Analysis of Faculty Mentees Funded by the Research Initiation in Engineering Formation (RIEF) Program
Contribution: Our work focuses on building research capacity in engineering education research (EER). We operationalize enculturation of novice researchers into the EER community by studying temporal changes in the social networks of engineering faculty participating in a mentorship-based training grant. Background: The U.S. National Science Foundation’s Research Initiation in Engineering Formation (RIEF) is a training grant for engineering faculty without prior EER experience who seek to conduct EER. Faculty mentees work with an experienced social science researcher during a funded two-year project. During this time, mentees must undergo a paradigm shift from engineering research to social science, which includes building research skills and becoming enculturated into the EER community. Research Questions: What are the characteristics of RIEF mentees’ professional networks for EER? How do RIEF mentees’ networks change over time, as operationalized by professional interactions, communication about the RIEF project, and collaborations? Methodology: We use social network analysis to investigate the development of EER professional networks of RIEF mentees and their interactions with other community members during the first year of their research initiation training. Findings: Overall, mentees’ professional networks for EER increased (i.e., reported more connections) after one year. However, when mentors had limited prior connections to the EER community, their mentees’ social networks for EER are isolated compared to mentees whose mentors have a higher number of connections to community members. Our findings have implications for mentored training programs, suggesting that well-connected mentors are best placed to enculturate mentees into a research community.
期刊介绍:
The IEEE Transactions on Education (ToE) publishes significant and original scholarly contributions to education in electrical and electronics engineering, computer engineering, computer science, and other fields within the scope of interest of IEEE. Contributions must address discovery, integration, and/or application of knowledge in education in these fields. Articles must support contributions and assertions with compelling evidence and provide explicit, transparent descriptions of the processes through which the evidence is collected, analyzed, and interpreted. While characteristics of compelling evidence cannot be described to address every conceivable situation, generally assessment of the work being reported must go beyond student self-report and attitudinal data.