验证用于检测哥伦比亚园艺土壤中黄铜疫霉的 qPCR 技术

IF 2.5 3区 农林科学 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Francy Liliana García-Arias, Edwin Rodríguez, Lorena Dávila-Mora, Donald Riascos-Ortiz, Eliana Revelo-Gómez, Alejandro Villabona Gelvez, Carlos Andrés Moreno-Velandia, Paola Zuluaga
{"title":"验证用于检测哥伦比亚园艺土壤中黄铜疫霉的 qPCR 技术","authors":"Francy Liliana García-Arias, Edwin Rodríguez, Lorena Dávila-Mora, Donald Riascos-Ortiz, Eliana Revelo-Gómez, Alejandro Villabona Gelvez, Carlos Andrés Moreno-Velandia, Paola Zuluaga","doi":"10.1007/s40858-024-00674-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Clubroot of crucifers caused by the soil-borne pathogen <i>Plasmodiophora brassicae</i> is a very destructive disease worldwide. The pathogen survives for many years in soil as resting spores (RS), which are formed in large numbers within the clubbed roots. RS can accumulate in the soil when brassicas are repeatedly grown, leading to increased levels inoculum for subsequent crops. The rapid spread of the pathogen in all cruciferous vegetable production areas in Colombia put the economy of farmers and the availability of these foods in the local market at risk. DNA-based techniques can be useful in determining the presence and concentration of pathogen in soil, making them valuable diagnostic tools for disease management and decision-making. Although the presence and the concentration of <i>P. brassicae</i> spores in soils from cruciferous producing areas in Colombia were determined using qPCR technique in 2017, to our knowledge no other works have addressed the use of diagnosis tools for management of clubroot in the country. No symptoms of clubroot were observed in horticultural areas in the Nariño department according to the mentioned report, despite finding pathogen DNA in the soil samples. However, significant yield losses caused by clubroot have been reported in Nariño since 2020, and many farms are currently growing alternative crops such as potato, carrot, and non-cruciferous crops because of the high <i>P. brassicae</i> pressure. To assess the risk of growing cruciferous crops, this work aims to validate the qPCR technique to detect and quantify <i>P. brassicae</i> in soil samples from the field. We used a model bioassay of pathogenicity test with various concentrations of <i>P. brassicae</i> and with a known susceptible cultivar of broccoli to standardize the methodology. Soil samples from horticultural fields were analyzed to validate the protocol. The bioassay allowed us to determine that a low concentration of 10 spores g<sup>−1</sup> is enough to cause disease symptoms in the host and a concentration of 10<sup>2</sup> spores of <i>P. brassicae</i> is the limit of detection by the qPCR technique. In the presence of the host, the RS concentration <i>of P. brassicae</i> in the soil increased between five and nine times in a single cycle, demonstrating the high rate of propagation of the pathogen. The Nariño department had the highest pathogen concentrations compared to Cundinamarca and Boyacá departments, which was associated to the lack of risk assessments, control measurements and the consecutive growing of susceptible cruciferous crops in infected fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":23354,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Plant Pathology","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the qPCR technique for the detection of Plasmodiophora brassicae in horticultural soils of Colombia\",\"authors\":\"Francy Liliana García-Arias, Edwin Rodríguez, Lorena Dávila-Mora, Donald Riascos-Ortiz, Eliana Revelo-Gómez, Alejandro Villabona Gelvez, Carlos Andrés Moreno-Velandia, Paola Zuluaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40858-024-00674-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Clubroot of crucifers caused by the soil-borne pathogen <i>Plasmodiophora brassicae</i> is a very destructive disease worldwide. The pathogen survives for many years in soil as resting spores (RS), which are formed in large numbers within the clubbed roots. RS can accumulate in the soil when brassicas are repeatedly grown, leading to increased levels inoculum for subsequent crops. The rapid spread of the pathogen in all cruciferous vegetable production areas in Colombia put the economy of farmers and the availability of these foods in the local market at risk. DNA-based techniques can be useful in determining the presence and concentration of pathogen in soil, making them valuable diagnostic tools for disease management and decision-making. Although the presence and the concentration of <i>P. brassicae</i> spores in soils from cruciferous producing areas in Colombia were determined using qPCR technique in 2017, to our knowledge no other works have addressed the use of diagnosis tools for management of clubroot in the country. No symptoms of clubroot were observed in horticultural areas in the Nariño department according to the mentioned report, despite finding pathogen DNA in the soil samples. However, significant yield losses caused by clubroot have been reported in Nariño since 2020, and many farms are currently growing alternative crops such as potato, carrot, and non-cruciferous crops because of the high <i>P. brassicae</i> pressure. To assess the risk of growing cruciferous crops, this work aims to validate the qPCR technique to detect and quantify <i>P. brassicae</i> in soil samples from the field. We used a model bioassay of pathogenicity test with various concentrations of <i>P. brassicae</i> and with a known susceptible cultivar of broccoli to standardize the methodology. Soil samples from horticultural fields were analyzed to validate the protocol. The bioassay allowed us to determine that a low concentration of 10 spores g<sup>−1</sup> is enough to cause disease symptoms in the host and a concentration of 10<sup>2</sup> spores of <i>P. brassicae</i> is the limit of detection by the qPCR technique. In the presence of the host, the RS concentration <i>of P. brassicae</i> in the soil increased between five and nine times in a single cycle, demonstrating the high rate of propagation of the pathogen. The Nariño department had the highest pathogen concentrations compared to Cundinamarca and Boyacá departments, which was associated to the lack of risk assessments, control measurements and the consecutive growing of susceptible cruciferous crops in infected fields.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Plant Pathology\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Plant Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-024-00674-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Plant Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-024-00674-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由土壤传播的病原体黄铜疫霉(Plasmodiophora brassicae)引起的十字花科植物棒根病是一种在全球范围内破坏性极大的病害。病原体以静止孢子(RS)的形式在土壤中存活多年,并在棍棒根中大量繁殖。反复种植芸苔属植物时,RS 会在土壤中积累,导致后茬作物的接种量增加。病原体在哥伦比亚所有十字花科蔬菜产区迅速蔓延,危及农民的经济和当地市场上这些食品的供应。基于 DNA 的技术有助于确定土壤中病原体的存在和浓度,使其成为疾病管理和决策的宝贵诊断工具。虽然 2017 年哥伦比亚十字花科产区土壤中铜绿假单胞菌孢子的存在和浓度是通过 qPCR 技术确定的,但据我们所知,该国还没有其他工作涉及使用诊断工具来管理棒根病。根据上述报告,尽管在土壤样本中发现了病原体 DNA,但在纳里尼奥省的园艺区没有观察到棒根病的症状。然而,自 2020 年以来,纳里尼奥省报告了由棒根病造成的重大产量损失,由于铜锈镰刀菌的高压力,许多农场目前正在种植替代作物,如马铃薯、胡萝卜和非十字花科作物。为了评估种植十字花科作物的风险,这项工作旨在验证 qPCR 技术,以检测和量化田间土壤样本中的铜绿微囊藻。我们用不同浓度的铜绿微囊锈菌和已知易感的西兰花栽培品种进行了致病性生物测定模型试验,以实现方法的标准化。对园艺田的土壤样本进行了分析,以验证该方案。通过生物测定,我们确定 10 个孢子 g-1 的低浓度就足以导致宿主出现疾病症状,而 102 个黄刺孢子的浓度是 qPCR 技术的检测极限。在宿主存在的情况下,土壤中黄铜疫霉的 RS 浓度在一个周期内增加了 5 到 9 倍,这表明病原体的繁殖率很高。与昆迪纳马卡省和博亚卡省相比,纳里尼奥省的病原体浓度最高,这与缺乏风险评估、控制措施以及在受感染的田地里连续种植易感十字花科作物有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validation of the qPCR technique for the detection of Plasmodiophora brassicae in horticultural soils of Colombia

Validation of the qPCR technique for the detection of Plasmodiophora brassicae in horticultural soils of Colombia

Clubroot of crucifers caused by the soil-borne pathogen Plasmodiophora brassicae is a very destructive disease worldwide. The pathogen survives for many years in soil as resting spores (RS), which are formed in large numbers within the clubbed roots. RS can accumulate in the soil when brassicas are repeatedly grown, leading to increased levels inoculum for subsequent crops. The rapid spread of the pathogen in all cruciferous vegetable production areas in Colombia put the economy of farmers and the availability of these foods in the local market at risk. DNA-based techniques can be useful in determining the presence and concentration of pathogen in soil, making them valuable diagnostic tools for disease management and decision-making. Although the presence and the concentration of P. brassicae spores in soils from cruciferous producing areas in Colombia were determined using qPCR technique in 2017, to our knowledge no other works have addressed the use of diagnosis tools for management of clubroot in the country. No symptoms of clubroot were observed in horticultural areas in the Nariño department according to the mentioned report, despite finding pathogen DNA in the soil samples. However, significant yield losses caused by clubroot have been reported in Nariño since 2020, and many farms are currently growing alternative crops such as potato, carrot, and non-cruciferous crops because of the high P. brassicae pressure. To assess the risk of growing cruciferous crops, this work aims to validate the qPCR technique to detect and quantify P. brassicae in soil samples from the field. We used a model bioassay of pathogenicity test with various concentrations of P. brassicae and with a known susceptible cultivar of broccoli to standardize the methodology. Soil samples from horticultural fields were analyzed to validate the protocol. The bioassay allowed us to determine that a low concentration of 10 spores g−1 is enough to cause disease symptoms in the host and a concentration of 102 spores of P. brassicae is the limit of detection by the qPCR technique. In the presence of the host, the RS concentration of P. brassicae in the soil increased between five and nine times in a single cycle, demonstrating the high rate of propagation of the pathogen. The Nariño department had the highest pathogen concentrations compared to Cundinamarca and Boyacá departments, which was associated to the lack of risk assessments, control measurements and the consecutive growing of susceptible cruciferous crops in infected fields.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical Plant Pathology
Tropical Plant Pathology PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tropical Plant Pathology is an international journal devoted to publishing a wide range of research on fundamental and applied aspects of plant diseases of concern to agricultural, forest and ornamental crops from tropical and subtropical environments.  Submissions must report original research that provides new insights into the etiology and epidemiology of plant disease as well as population biology of plant pathogens, host-pathogen interactions, physiological and molecular plant pathology, and strategies to promote crop protection. The journal considers for publication: original articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor. For more details please check the submission guidelines. Founded in 1976, the journal is the official publication of the Brazilian Phytopathology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信