自学 L2 词汇学习中的智能个人助手

IF 4.8 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Assim S. Alrajhi
{"title":"自学 L2 词汇学习中的智能个人助手","authors":"Assim S. Alrajhi","doi":"10.1007/s10639-024-12967-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Motivated by the proliferation of artificial intelligence that has the potential to promote self-access learning, this study utilizes a sequential explanatory quasi-experimental mixed methods design to investigate the efficacy of Google Assistant (GA) in facilitating second language (L2) vocabulary learning compared to online dictionaries. A cohort of EFL university students (<i>n</i> = 74) was assigned to two groups: a control group using online dictionaries and an experimental group utilizing GA. Over six learning sessions, both groups learned 10% of Coxhead’s (2000) Academic Vocabulary List. With data drawn from multiple sources, including pre- and post-tests, a survey questionnaire, and individual interviews, the findings reveal significant improvements in vocabulary knowledge for both groups, indicating that GA can be utilized as an effective vocabulary learning tool. Despite concerns regarding the quality of GA’s voice recognition as a potential demotivating factor, learners hold positive views on the efficacy of GA. These perceptions reflect influential factors primarily situated within the cognitive and affective domains of learning. Accordingly, key affordances and limitations of GA are identified. This study proposes pedagogical implications and outlines potential avenues for further research in the domain of intelligent personal assistants-assisted L2 vocabulary learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51494,"journal":{"name":"Education and Information Technologies","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intelligent personal assistants in self-access L2 vocabulary learning\",\"authors\":\"Assim S. Alrajhi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10639-024-12967-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Motivated by the proliferation of artificial intelligence that has the potential to promote self-access learning, this study utilizes a sequential explanatory quasi-experimental mixed methods design to investigate the efficacy of Google Assistant (GA) in facilitating second language (L2) vocabulary learning compared to online dictionaries. A cohort of EFL university students (<i>n</i> = 74) was assigned to two groups: a control group using online dictionaries and an experimental group utilizing GA. Over six learning sessions, both groups learned 10% of Coxhead’s (2000) Academic Vocabulary List. With data drawn from multiple sources, including pre- and post-tests, a survey questionnaire, and individual interviews, the findings reveal significant improvements in vocabulary knowledge for both groups, indicating that GA can be utilized as an effective vocabulary learning tool. Despite concerns regarding the quality of GA’s voice recognition as a potential demotivating factor, learners hold positive views on the efficacy of GA. These perceptions reflect influential factors primarily situated within the cognitive and affective domains of learning. Accordingly, key affordances and limitations of GA are identified. This study proposes pedagogical implications and outlines potential avenues for further research in the domain of intelligent personal assistants-assisted L2 vocabulary learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Information Technologies\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Information Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12967-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12967-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能的普及有可能促进自主学习,受此激励,本研究采用顺序解释准实验混合方法设计,调查谷歌助手(GA)与在线词典相比在促进第二语言(L2)词汇学习方面的功效。一组 EFL 大学生(n = 74)被分为两组:使用在线词典的对照组和使用谷歌助手的实验组。在六节学习课程中,两组学生都学习了 Coxhead(2000 年)学术词汇表中 10%的词汇。研究数据来自多个方面,包括前测和后测、调查问卷和个别访谈,研究结果显示,两组学生的词汇知识都有显著提高,表明GA可以作为一种有效的词汇学习工具。尽管人们担心 GA 的语音识别质量可能会降低学习积极性,但学习者对 GA 的功效持有积极的看法。这些看法主要反映了学习认知和情感领域的影响因素。因此,本研究确定了性别问题的关键能力和局限性。本研究提出了智能个人助理辅助 L2 词汇学习领域的教学意义,并概述了进一步研究的潜在途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Intelligent personal assistants in self-access L2 vocabulary learning

Intelligent personal assistants in self-access L2 vocabulary learning

Motivated by the proliferation of artificial intelligence that has the potential to promote self-access learning, this study utilizes a sequential explanatory quasi-experimental mixed methods design to investigate the efficacy of Google Assistant (GA) in facilitating second language (L2) vocabulary learning compared to online dictionaries. A cohort of EFL university students (n = 74) was assigned to two groups: a control group using online dictionaries and an experimental group utilizing GA. Over six learning sessions, both groups learned 10% of Coxhead’s (2000) Academic Vocabulary List. With data drawn from multiple sources, including pre- and post-tests, a survey questionnaire, and individual interviews, the findings reveal significant improvements in vocabulary knowledge for both groups, indicating that GA can be utilized as an effective vocabulary learning tool. Despite concerns regarding the quality of GA’s voice recognition as a potential demotivating factor, learners hold positive views on the efficacy of GA. These perceptions reflect influential factors primarily situated within the cognitive and affective domains of learning. Accordingly, key affordances and limitations of GA are identified. This study proposes pedagogical implications and outlines potential avenues for further research in the domain of intelligent personal assistants-assisted L2 vocabulary learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Information Technologies
Education and Information Technologies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
610
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education and Information Technologies (EAIT) is a platform for the range of debates and issues in the field of Computing Education as well as the many uses of information and communication technology (ICT) across many educational subjects and sectors. It probes the use of computing to improve education and learning in a variety of settings, platforms and environments. The journal aims to provide perspectives at all levels, from the micro level of specific pedagogical approaches in Computing Education and applications or instances of use in classrooms, to macro concerns of national policies and major projects; from pre-school classes to adults in tertiary institutions; from teachers and administrators to researchers and designers; from institutions to online and lifelong learning. The journal is embedded in the research and practice of professionals within the contemporary global context and its breadth and scope encourage debate on fundamental issues at all levels and from different research paradigms and learning theories. The journal does not proselytize on behalf of the technologies (whether they be mobile, desktop, interactive, virtual, games-based or learning management systems) but rather provokes debate on all the complex relationships within and between computing and education, whether they are in informal or formal settings. It probes state of the art technologies in Computing Education and it also considers the design and evaluation of digital educational artefacts.  The journal aims to maintain and expand its international standing by careful selection on merit of the papers submitted, thus providing a credible ongoing forum for debate and scholarly discourse. Special Issues are occasionally published to cover particular issues in depth. EAIT invites readers to submit papers that draw inferences, probe theory and create new knowledge that informs practice, policy and scholarship. Readers are also invited to comment and reflect upon the argument and opinions published. EAIT is the official journal of the Technical Committee on Education of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) in partnership with UNESCO.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信