学校健康教育计划的方法--定性研究

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Roberta Marković , Aleksandra Ignjatović , Aleksandar Višnjić , Miodrag Stojanović , Marija Andjelković Apostolović , Suzana Otasević
{"title":"学校健康教育计划的方法--定性研究","authors":"Roberta Marković ,&nbsp;Aleksandra Ignjatović ,&nbsp;Aleksandar Višnjić ,&nbsp;Miodrag Stojanović ,&nbsp;Marija Andjelković Apostolović ,&nbsp;Suzana Otasević","doi":"10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess strengths and weaknesses of the methodology of health education programs, carried out in the period 2010–2020, in schools in Serbia.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Qualitative study, a thematic analysis approach.</p></div><div><h3>Site</h3><p>Representatives of Public Health institutions, Serbian biggest nongovernmental organization, Youth organization, Ministry of education and municipality.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Nine professionals working in the field of Public Health and Health education.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Focus group gathered nine health and non-health professionals in 2022 year. Focus group was recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded and analyzed by three research team members. A coding template evolved through the analysis, providing the expansion of key concepts. Themes were, one by one, extracted, encoded, classified as the smallest units and interpretive, thematic analysis was applied.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Although the Focus group in our study identified among other advantages, support of Health sector to Educational sector as crucial, it emphasized as well following weaknesses: Analyzed health education programs were implemented insufficiently as a separate process in schools, did not have the image of programs shared and integrated into community; Health education needs of schoolchildren, parents, and teachers should be examined prior the education implementation; Well-educated interdisciplinary educators have to be strengthened and supported; Parents participation is necessity; Standards and good practice guidelines are needed, and those developed through Health Promoting Schools program could be practiced.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>It is necessary to support cross-curricular competence, where health education should be integrated into all school subjects, and should go far beyond the school, grow into a culture of community life, which will interconnect all stakeholders in strong Public Health network.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55435,"journal":{"name":"Atencion Primaria","volume":"56 12","pages":"Article 103091"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0212656724002336/pdfft?md5=af3e09fb3d75f05a764163cee372cf34&pid=1-s2.0-S0212656724002336-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The methodology of health education programs in schools—Qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Roberta Marković ,&nbsp;Aleksandra Ignjatović ,&nbsp;Aleksandar Višnjić ,&nbsp;Miodrag Stojanović ,&nbsp;Marija Andjelković Apostolović ,&nbsp;Suzana Otasević\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess strengths and weaknesses of the methodology of health education programs, carried out in the period 2010–2020, in schools in Serbia.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Qualitative study, a thematic analysis approach.</p></div><div><h3>Site</h3><p>Representatives of Public Health institutions, Serbian biggest nongovernmental organization, Youth organization, Ministry of education and municipality.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Nine professionals working in the field of Public Health and Health education.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Focus group gathered nine health and non-health professionals in 2022 year. Focus group was recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded and analyzed by three research team members. A coding template evolved through the analysis, providing the expansion of key concepts. Themes were, one by one, extracted, encoded, classified as the smallest units and interpretive, thematic analysis was applied.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Although the Focus group in our study identified among other advantages, support of Health sector to Educational sector as crucial, it emphasized as well following weaknesses: Analyzed health education programs were implemented insufficiently as a separate process in schools, did not have the image of programs shared and integrated into community; Health education needs of schoolchildren, parents, and teachers should be examined prior the education implementation; Well-educated interdisciplinary educators have to be strengthened and supported; Parents participation is necessity; Standards and good practice guidelines are needed, and those developed through Health Promoting Schools program could be practiced.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>It is necessary to support cross-curricular competence, where health education should be integrated into all school subjects, and should go far beyond the school, grow into a culture of community life, which will interconnect all stakeholders in strong Public Health network.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atencion Primaria\",\"volume\":\"56 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 103091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0212656724002336/pdfft?md5=af3e09fb3d75f05a764163cee372cf34&pid=1-s2.0-S0212656724002336-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atencion Primaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0212656724002336\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atencion Primaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0212656724002336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计定性研究,采用专题分析方法。研究地点公共卫生机构、塞尔维亚最大的非政府组织、青年组织、教育部和市政府的代表。研究小组的三名成员对焦点小组进行了录音、逐字记录、编码和分析。通过分析,形成了一个编码模板,为关键概念的扩展提供了依据。对主题逐一进行了提取、编码、最小单位分类,并应用了解释性专题分析。结果虽然在我们的研究中,焦点小组发现了卫生部门对教育部门的支持等优势,但也强调了以下不足:所分析的健康教育计划没有作为一个独立的过程在学校中充分实施,没有树立计划共享和融入社区的形象;在实施教育之前,应检查学童、家长和教师的健康教育需求;受过良好教育的跨学科教育工作者必须得到加强和支持;家长的参与是必要的;需要制定标准和良好实践指南,通过 "健康促进学校 "计划制定的标准和指南可以付诸实践。结论:有必要支持跨学科能力,将健康教育纳入学校的所有科目,并应远远超出学校的范围,发展成为社区生活的一种文化,这将在强大的公共卫生网络中将所有利益相关者联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The methodology of health education programs in schools—Qualitative study

Objective

To assess strengths and weaknesses of the methodology of health education programs, carried out in the period 2010–2020, in schools in Serbia.

Design

Qualitative study, a thematic analysis approach.

Site

Representatives of Public Health institutions, Serbian biggest nongovernmental organization, Youth organization, Ministry of education and municipality.

Participants

Nine professionals working in the field of Public Health and Health education.

Method

Focus group gathered nine health and non-health professionals in 2022 year. Focus group was recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded and analyzed by three research team members. A coding template evolved through the analysis, providing the expansion of key concepts. Themes were, one by one, extracted, encoded, classified as the smallest units and interpretive, thematic analysis was applied.

Results

Although the Focus group in our study identified among other advantages, support of Health sector to Educational sector as crucial, it emphasized as well following weaknesses: Analyzed health education programs were implemented insufficiently as a separate process in schools, did not have the image of programs shared and integrated into community; Health education needs of schoolchildren, parents, and teachers should be examined prior the education implementation; Well-educated interdisciplinary educators have to be strengthened and supported; Parents participation is necessity; Standards and good practice guidelines are needed, and those developed through Health Promoting Schools program could be practiced.

Conclusion

It is necessary to support cross-curricular competence, where health education should be integrated into all school subjects, and should go far beyond the school, grow into a culture of community life, which will interconnect all stakeholders in strong Public Health network.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Atencion Primaria
Atencion Primaria 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Atención Primaria es una revista que publica trabajos de investigación relativos al ámbito de la atención primaria de salud. Desde el punto de vista conceptual, Atención Primaria asume el nuevo modelo de atención primaria de salud, orientado no sólo a la curación de la enfermedad, sino también a su prevención y a la promoción de la salud, tanto en el plano individual como en el de la familia y la comunidad. En estos nuevos aspectos que definen el modelo de atención primaria de salud es en los que se centran los trabajos de investigación que publica Atención Primaria, la primera revista de originales española creada para recoger y difundir la producción científica realizada desde los centros de atención primaria de salud sobre cuestiones como protocolización de la asistencia, programas de prevención, seguimiento y control de pacientes crónicos, organización y gestión de la asistencia primaria, entre otros.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信