为美国全国调查建立钝器和雪茄使用的标准衡量标准

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
{"title":"为美国全国调查建立钝器和雪茄使用的标准衡量标准","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Researchers have drawn attention to the need for modifying survey questions on cigars for distinguishing use intended for tobacco versus cannabis (i.e. blunt) consumption. Yet, most surveys do not distinguish persons who only smoke blunts (POSB) from persons who smoke blunts and unmodified cigars/cigarillos (PSBC). This study was intended to evaluate existing measures in U.S. national surveys for establishing a standard for the field.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two of six leading U.S national surveys, the NSDUH and PATH, measured dual use of blunts and cigars. The analytical sample of this study included adult participants of the 2017 NSDUH (n = 2493) and Wave 4 PATH (n = 3175) who smoked a cigar or blunt in the past month and reported cigar brand usually or last smoked; the latter was used as a validation measure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Odds of using Swisher Sweets and other brands (vs. Black &amp; Mild) increased with more frequent blunt use relative to persons who only smoked unmodified cigars/cigarillos (POSC). Further, regression coefficients for the three subgroups of PSBC differed significantly, highlighting the utility of an ordinal versus aggregated measure. Estimates of the former were diminished in magnitude upon expanding the sample to persons who smoked any cigar product.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Validation of the ordinal measure of blunt-cigarillo use in PATH supports the measure’s implementation as a standard for U.S. national surveys. Implementation of the measure in other surveys (e.g., NSDUH) would provide a more consistent and accurate assessment of blunt and cigar use for monitoring health risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing a standard measure of blunt and cigar use for U.S. national surveys\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Researchers have drawn attention to the need for modifying survey questions on cigars for distinguishing use intended for tobacco versus cannabis (i.e. blunt) consumption. Yet, most surveys do not distinguish persons who only smoke blunts (POSB) from persons who smoke blunts and unmodified cigars/cigarillos (PSBC). This study was intended to evaluate existing measures in U.S. national surveys for establishing a standard for the field.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two of six leading U.S national surveys, the NSDUH and PATH, measured dual use of blunts and cigars. The analytical sample of this study included adult participants of the 2017 NSDUH (n = 2493) and Wave 4 PATH (n = 3175) who smoked a cigar or blunt in the past month and reported cigar brand usually or last smoked; the latter was used as a validation measure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Odds of using Swisher Sweets and other brands (vs. Black &amp; Mild) increased with more frequent blunt use relative to persons who only smoked unmodified cigars/cigarillos (POSC). Further, regression coefficients for the three subgroups of PSBC differed significantly, highlighting the utility of an ordinal versus aggregated measure. Estimates of the former were diminished in magnitude upon expanding the sample to persons who smoked any cigar product.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Validation of the ordinal measure of blunt-cigarillo use in PATH supports the measure’s implementation as a standard for U.S. national surveys. Implementation of the measure in other surveys (e.g., NSDUH) would provide a more consistent and accurate assessment of blunt and cigar use for monitoring health risks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addictive behaviors\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addictive behaviors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460324002053\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460324002053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景研究人员已提请注意有必要修改有关雪茄的调查问题,以区分雪茄是用于吸食烟草还是用于吸食大麻(即钝烟)。然而,大多数调查并不区分只吸钝烟者(POSB)和吸钝烟及未改装雪茄/雪茄烟者(PSBC)。本研究旨在评估美国国家调查中的现有测量方法,以便为该领域建立一个标准。方法美国六项主要国家调查中的两项,即 NSDUH 和 PATH,测量了短烟头和雪茄的双重使用情况。本研究的分析样本包括 2017 年 NSDUH(n = 2493)和第 4 波 PATH(n = 3175)的成年参与者,他们在过去一个月内吸食过雪茄或钝烟,并报告了通常或最后一次吸食的雪茄品牌;后者被用作验证措施。结果相对于只吸食未经改装的雪茄/雪茄烟(POSC)的人而言,使用 Swisher Sweets 和其他品牌(与 Black & Mild 相比)钝烟的频率越高,使用钝烟的比率就越高。此外,PSBC 三个亚组的回归系数也有显著差异,这突出表明了序数衡量与综合衡量的效用。在将样本扩大到吸食任何雪茄产品的人群后,前者的估计值在幅度上有所减小。在其他调查(如美国国家统计与人口普查)中采用该指标将为监测健康风险提供更一致、更准确的钝烟和雪茄使用情况评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishing a standard measure of blunt and cigar use for U.S. national surveys

Background

Researchers have drawn attention to the need for modifying survey questions on cigars for distinguishing use intended for tobacco versus cannabis (i.e. blunt) consumption. Yet, most surveys do not distinguish persons who only smoke blunts (POSB) from persons who smoke blunts and unmodified cigars/cigarillos (PSBC). This study was intended to evaluate existing measures in U.S. national surveys for establishing a standard for the field.

Methods

Two of six leading U.S national surveys, the NSDUH and PATH, measured dual use of blunts and cigars. The analytical sample of this study included adult participants of the 2017 NSDUH (n = 2493) and Wave 4 PATH (n = 3175) who smoked a cigar or blunt in the past month and reported cigar brand usually or last smoked; the latter was used as a validation measure.

Results

Odds of using Swisher Sweets and other brands (vs. Black & Mild) increased with more frequent blunt use relative to persons who only smoked unmodified cigars/cigarillos (POSC). Further, regression coefficients for the three subgroups of PSBC differed significantly, highlighting the utility of an ordinal versus aggregated measure. Estimates of the former were diminished in magnitude upon expanding the sample to persons who smoked any cigar product.

Conclusions

Validation of the ordinal measure of blunt-cigarillo use in PATH supports the measure’s implementation as a standard for U.S. national surveys. Implementation of the measure in other surveys (e.g., NSDUH) would provide a more consistent and accurate assessment of blunt and cigar use for monitoring health risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive behaviors
Addictive behaviors 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
283
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings. Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信