验证一种同时评估语音错配反应和频率跟随反应的新型范式。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Tzu-Han Zoe Cheng , Tian Christina Zhao
{"title":"验证一种同时评估语音错配反应和频率跟随反应的新型范式。","authors":"Tzu-Han Zoe Cheng ,&nbsp;Tian Christina Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Speech sounds are processed in the human brain through intricate and interconnected cortical and subcortical structures. Two neural signatures, one largely from cortical sources (mismatch response, MMR) and one largely from subcortical sources (frequency-following response, FFR) are critical for assessing speech processing as they both show sensitivity to high-level linguistic information. However, there are distinct prerequisites for recording MMR and FFR, making them difficult to acquire simultaneously</p></div><div><h3>New method</h3><p>Using a new paradigm, our study aims to concurrently capture both signals and test them against the following criteria: (1) replicating the effect that the MMR to a native speech contrast significantly differs from the MMR to a nonnative speech contrast, and (2) demonstrating that FFRs to three speech sounds can be reliably differentiated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Using EEG from 18 adults, we observed a decoding accuracy of 72.2 % between the MMR to native vs. nonnative speech contrasts. A significantly larger native MMR was shown in the expected time window. Similarly, a significant decoding accuracy of 79.6 % was found for FFR. A high stimulus-to-response cross-correlation with a 9 ms lag suggested that FFR closely tracks speech sounds.</p></div><div><h3>Comparison with existing method(s)</h3><p>These findings demonstrate that our paradigm reliably captures both MMR and FFR concurrently, replicating and extending past research with much fewer trials (MMR: 50 trials; FFR: 200 trials) and shorter experiment time (12 minutes).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study paves the way to understanding cortical-subcortical interactions for speech and language processing, with the ultimate goal of developing an assessment tool specific to early development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":"412 ","pages":"Article 110277"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating a novel paradigm for simultaneously assessing mismatch response and frequency-following response to speech sounds\",\"authors\":\"Tzu-Han Zoe Cheng ,&nbsp;Tian Christina Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Speech sounds are processed in the human brain through intricate and interconnected cortical and subcortical structures. Two neural signatures, one largely from cortical sources (mismatch response, MMR) and one largely from subcortical sources (frequency-following response, FFR) are critical for assessing speech processing as they both show sensitivity to high-level linguistic information. However, there are distinct prerequisites for recording MMR and FFR, making them difficult to acquire simultaneously</p></div><div><h3>New method</h3><p>Using a new paradigm, our study aims to concurrently capture both signals and test them against the following criteria: (1) replicating the effect that the MMR to a native speech contrast significantly differs from the MMR to a nonnative speech contrast, and (2) demonstrating that FFRs to three speech sounds can be reliably differentiated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Using EEG from 18 adults, we observed a decoding accuracy of 72.2 % between the MMR to native vs. nonnative speech contrasts. A significantly larger native MMR was shown in the expected time window. Similarly, a significant decoding accuracy of 79.6 % was found for FFR. A high stimulus-to-response cross-correlation with a 9 ms lag suggested that FFR closely tracks speech sounds.</p></div><div><h3>Comparison with existing method(s)</h3><p>These findings demonstrate that our paradigm reliably captures both MMR and FFR concurrently, replicating and extending past research with much fewer trials (MMR: 50 trials; FFR: 200 trials) and shorter experiment time (12 minutes).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study paves the way to understanding cortical-subcortical interactions for speech and language processing, with the ultimate goal of developing an assessment tool specific to early development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Methods\",\"volume\":\"412 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016502702400222X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016502702400222X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:语音在人脑中通过错综复杂、相互关联的皮层和皮层下结构进行处理。有两种神经特征,一种主要来自大脑皮层(错配反应,MMR),另一种主要来自大脑皮层下(频率跟随反应,FFR),这两种特征对评估语音处理过程至关重要,因为它们都显示了对高级语言信息的敏感性。新方法:我们的研究采用了一种新范式,旨在同时捕捉这两种信号,并根据以下标准对其进行测试:(1)复制母语语音对比的 MMR 与非母语语音对比的 MMR 显著不同的效果;(2)证明三种语音的 FFR 可以可靠地区分:利用 18 名成人的脑电图,我们观察到母语与非母语语音对比的 MMR 解码准确率为 72.2%。在预期的时间窗口中,母语 MMR 明显更大。同样,FFR 的解码准确率也达到了 79.6%。9 毫秒滞后的高刺激-反应交叉相关性表明,FFR 能密切跟踪语音:这些研究结果表明,我们的范式能同时可靠地捕捉 MMR 和 FFR,以更少的实验次数(MMR:50 次;FFR:200 次)和更短的实验时间(12 分钟)复制并扩展了过去的研究:本研究为了解大脑皮层和皮层下之间在语音和语言处理方面的相互作用铺平了道路,其最终目标是开发出一种专门用于早期发育的评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validating a novel paradigm for simultaneously assessing mismatch response and frequency-following response to speech sounds

Background

Speech sounds are processed in the human brain through intricate and interconnected cortical and subcortical structures. Two neural signatures, one largely from cortical sources (mismatch response, MMR) and one largely from subcortical sources (frequency-following response, FFR) are critical for assessing speech processing as they both show sensitivity to high-level linguistic information. However, there are distinct prerequisites for recording MMR and FFR, making them difficult to acquire simultaneously

New method

Using a new paradigm, our study aims to concurrently capture both signals and test them against the following criteria: (1) replicating the effect that the MMR to a native speech contrast significantly differs from the MMR to a nonnative speech contrast, and (2) demonstrating that FFRs to three speech sounds can be reliably differentiated.

Results

Using EEG from 18 adults, we observed a decoding accuracy of 72.2 % between the MMR to native vs. nonnative speech contrasts. A significantly larger native MMR was shown in the expected time window. Similarly, a significant decoding accuracy of 79.6 % was found for FFR. A high stimulus-to-response cross-correlation with a 9 ms lag suggested that FFR closely tracks speech sounds.

Comparison with existing method(s)

These findings demonstrate that our paradigm reliably captures both MMR and FFR concurrently, replicating and extending past research with much fewer trials (MMR: 50 trials; FFR: 200 trials) and shorter experiment time (12 minutes).

Conclusions

This study paves the way to understanding cortical-subcortical interactions for speech and language processing, with the ultimate goal of developing an assessment tool specific to early development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信