利用液相色谱-串联质谱法测定碳酸饮料和金枪鱼罐头中双酚 A 及其类似物的含量和暴露量。

IF 2.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Sang Yoo Lee, Cha Nee Yoo, So Young Woo, Su Bin Park, Hyang Sook Chun
{"title":"利用液相色谱-串联质谱法测定碳酸饮料和金枪鱼罐头中双酚 A 及其类似物的含量和暴露量。","authors":"Sang Yoo Lee, Cha Nee Yoo, So Young Woo, Su Bin Park, Hyang Sook Chun","doi":"10.1080/19440049.2024.2397526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bisphenol A (BPA), a known endocrine disruptor, is commonly used in food containers and packaging. Recently, alternatives such as bisphenol AF (BPAF), bisphenol B (BPB), and bisphenol E (BPE) have been introduced to replace BPA. However, these substitutes have been reported to exhibit toxicity levels similar to BPA. In this study, we developed and validated a method for the analysis of trace bisphenols (BPA, BPAF, BPB, and BPE) in food using immunoaffinity column (IAC) clean-up. The method demonstrated satisfactory accuracy and precision. We applied this validated method to analyze 56 carbonated beverage samples and 30 canned tuna samples. In the carbonated beverages, average concentrations of BPA and BPAF were 0.4 and 0.2 μg kg<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. In canned tuna, BPA and BPAF were found at average concentrations of 22.2 and 0.7 μg kg<sup>-1</sup>, respectively, while BPB and BPE were not detected in any samples. Estimated exposure levels ranged from 0.13 to 0.18 ng kg bw<sup>-1 </sup>day<sup>-1</sup> in the general population and from 205.2 to 232.0 ng kg bw<sup>-1 </sup>day<sup>-1</sup> among consumers. The commercial IAC-based analytical method used in this study can contribute to the safety management of BPA, BPAF, BPB, and BPE.</p>","PeriodicalId":12295,"journal":{"name":"Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1521-1532"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of the occurrence of and exposure to bisphenol A and its analogues in carbonated beverages and canned tuna using liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry.\",\"authors\":\"Sang Yoo Lee, Cha Nee Yoo, So Young Woo, Su Bin Park, Hyang Sook Chun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19440049.2024.2397526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bisphenol A (BPA), a known endocrine disruptor, is commonly used in food containers and packaging. Recently, alternatives such as bisphenol AF (BPAF), bisphenol B (BPB), and bisphenol E (BPE) have been introduced to replace BPA. However, these substitutes have been reported to exhibit toxicity levels similar to BPA. In this study, we developed and validated a method for the analysis of trace bisphenols (BPA, BPAF, BPB, and BPE) in food using immunoaffinity column (IAC) clean-up. The method demonstrated satisfactory accuracy and precision. We applied this validated method to analyze 56 carbonated beverage samples and 30 canned tuna samples. In the carbonated beverages, average concentrations of BPA and BPAF were 0.4 and 0.2 μg kg<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. In canned tuna, BPA and BPAF were found at average concentrations of 22.2 and 0.7 μg kg<sup>-1</sup>, respectively, while BPB and BPE were not detected in any samples. Estimated exposure levels ranged from 0.13 to 0.18 ng kg bw<sup>-1 </sup>day<sup>-1</sup> in the general population and from 205.2 to 232.0 ng kg bw<sup>-1 </sup>day<sup>-1</sup> among consumers. The commercial IAC-based analytical method used in this study can contribute to the safety management of BPA, BPAF, BPB, and BPE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1521-1532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2024.2397526\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2024.2397526","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双酚 A(BPA)是一种已知的内分泌干扰物,常用于食品容器和包装。最近,出现了双酚 AF (BPAF)、双酚 B (BPB) 和双酚 E (BPE) 等替代品来取代双酚 A。然而,据报道这些替代品的毒性水平与双酚 A 相似。在这项研究中,我们利用免疫亲和柱(IAC)净化技术开发并验证了一种分析食品中痕量双酚(双酚 A、双酚 F、双酚 B 和双酚 E)的方法。该方法的准确度和精密度均令人满意。我们应用这种经过验证的方法分析了 56 个碳酸饮料样品和 30 个金枪鱼罐头样品。在碳酸饮料中,双酚 A 和双酚 F 的平均浓度分别为 0.4 和 0.2 μg kg-1。在金枪鱼罐头样本中,双酚 A 和双酚 F 的平均浓度分别为 22.2 微克/千克和 0.7 微克/千克,而所有样本中均未检测到 BPB 和 BPE。一般人群的估计暴露水平为 0.13 至 0.18 纳克/千克体重-1 天-1,消费者的估计暴露水平为 205.2 至 232.0 纳克/千克体重-1 天-1。本研究采用的基于 IAC 的商用分析方法有助于对双酚 A、双酚 AF、双酚 B 和双酚 E 进行安全管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of the occurrence of and exposure to bisphenol A and its analogues in carbonated beverages and canned tuna using liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry.

Bisphenol A (BPA), a known endocrine disruptor, is commonly used in food containers and packaging. Recently, alternatives such as bisphenol AF (BPAF), bisphenol B (BPB), and bisphenol E (BPE) have been introduced to replace BPA. However, these substitutes have been reported to exhibit toxicity levels similar to BPA. In this study, we developed and validated a method for the analysis of trace bisphenols (BPA, BPAF, BPB, and BPE) in food using immunoaffinity column (IAC) clean-up. The method demonstrated satisfactory accuracy and precision. We applied this validated method to analyze 56 carbonated beverage samples and 30 canned tuna samples. In the carbonated beverages, average concentrations of BPA and BPAF were 0.4 and 0.2 μg kg-1, respectively. In canned tuna, BPA and BPAF were found at average concentrations of 22.2 and 0.7 μg kg-1, respectively, while BPB and BPE were not detected in any samples. Estimated exposure levels ranged from 0.13 to 0.18 ng kg bw-1 day-1 in the general population and from 205.2 to 232.0 ng kg bw-1 day-1 among consumers. The commercial IAC-based analytical method used in this study can contribute to the safety management of BPA, BPAF, BPB, and BPE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
136
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A publishes original research papers and critical reviews covering analytical methodology, occurrence, persistence, safety evaluation, detoxification and regulatory control of natural and man-made additives and contaminants in the food and animal feed chain. Papers are published in the areas of food additives including flavourings, pesticide and veterinary drug residues, environmental contaminants, plant toxins, mycotoxins, marine biotoxins, trace elements, migration from food packaging, food process contaminants, adulteration, authenticity and allergenicity of foods. Papers are published on animal feed where residues and contaminants can give rise to food safety concerns. Contributions cover chemistry, biochemistry and bioavailability of these substances, factors affecting levels during production, processing, packaging and storage; the development of novel foods and processes; exposure and risk assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信