炉边谈话:利用录制的医学专家病例讨论来教授临床推理。

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Ghaniah Hassan-Smith, Zaki Hassan-Smith
{"title":"炉边谈话:利用录制的医学专家病例讨论来教授临床推理。","authors":"Ghaniah Hassan-Smith,&nbsp;Zaki Hassan-Smith","doi":"10.1111/medu.15497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Consensus opinion suggests that students and trainees receive insufficient teaching on clinical reasoning.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Following the COVID-19 pandemic, students had reduced access to some specialist clinics, which impacted on their educational opportunities within clinical reasoning, including discussions around choice and interpretation of diagnostic tests, problem identification and management approach. Feedback from students and clinicians, confirmed that this remains a challenge in some medical specialities with increasing clinical pressures, use of remote consultations and reductions in educational time in clinical job plans.</p><p>To address this, we devised an efficient process whereby a bank of video resources, called ‘Fireside Chats’ was created and made available to students to support the development of clinical reasoning abilities. This was piloted for students rotating through clinical rotations in Endocrinology and Neurology, within our teaching hospital. Topics were selected and mapped to the learning outcomes of the Clinical Curriculum in each specialty. We prepared Powerpoint presentations of example clinical cases, including details of clinical presentation and history, examination findings, initial investigations and ongoing management, under each sub-specialty area. We identified clinical experts, who were consultant physicians with relevant sub-specialty interests (e.g. for endocrinology these included metabolic bone, adrenal, pituitary and thyroid disease etc.). The clinical experts were given guidance on learning objectives, and format considerations and were invited to an MS Teams meeting with us, where the ‘Fireside Chat’ was recorded. The clinical expert was given an online briefing ahead of the recording where queries were addressed. We acted as case presenters and posed questions to facilitate a discussion with the clinical expert, with the aim of sharing insights into the clinical reasoning process, for a range of cases. The chats finished with summary learning points and links to further reading. The ‘Fireside Chat’ recordings were made available on the virtual learning environments for the associated medical schools. The full recordings were presented as long-form discussions on a sub-specialty topic, covering several cases lasting up to 1 hour in total. Students were directed to these as part of placement induction and were encouraged to use these as the basis for further learning and discussion during clinical placements.</p><p>The bank of resources was well-received by students, with positive evaluation feedback. Students suggested potential future topics for the chats. The process was efficient, with a relatively short preparation time. Clinical experts enjoyed the process, and appreciated the time-efficient way in which they were able to share their insights. This offers a solution, whereby clinical teams can be guided in using this simple process, to develop high quality video resources, to support education in clinical reasoning.</p><p>After the initial video, we piloted a student-led approach, whereby medical students presented anonymised cases to a subject expert. This is a scalable solution and has inherent benefits relating to the peer-led learning approach. Although the long-form videos did not require significant editing, we are developing shorter focused versions, where take-home points are presented in smaller chunks in an interactive format.</p><p><b>Zaki Hassan-Smith:</b> Conceptualization; methodology; supervision; resources; conceptualization; writing—original draft; methodology; project administration; supervision. <b>Ghaniah Hassan-Smith:</b> Conceptualization; methodology; supervision; resources; conceptualization; writing—original draft; methodology; project administration; supervision.</p><p>The authors have no conflicts of interest or acknowledgements to make.</p><p>This work has been deemed exempt from ethical review at the authors institution.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"58 11","pages":"1377-1378"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15497","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fireside chats: Using recorded case-based discussions with medical experts to teach clinical reasoning\",\"authors\":\"Ghaniah Hassan-Smith,&nbsp;Zaki Hassan-Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/medu.15497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Consensus opinion suggests that students and trainees receive insufficient teaching on clinical reasoning.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Following the COVID-19 pandemic, students had reduced access to some specialist clinics, which impacted on their educational opportunities within clinical reasoning, including discussions around choice and interpretation of diagnostic tests, problem identification and management approach. Feedback from students and clinicians, confirmed that this remains a challenge in some medical specialities with increasing clinical pressures, use of remote consultations and reductions in educational time in clinical job plans.</p><p>To address this, we devised an efficient process whereby a bank of video resources, called ‘Fireside Chats’ was created and made available to students to support the development of clinical reasoning abilities. This was piloted for students rotating through clinical rotations in Endocrinology and Neurology, within our teaching hospital. Topics were selected and mapped to the learning outcomes of the Clinical Curriculum in each specialty. We prepared Powerpoint presentations of example clinical cases, including details of clinical presentation and history, examination findings, initial investigations and ongoing management, under each sub-specialty area. We identified clinical experts, who were consultant physicians with relevant sub-specialty interests (e.g. for endocrinology these included metabolic bone, adrenal, pituitary and thyroid disease etc.). The clinical experts were given guidance on learning objectives, and format considerations and were invited to an MS Teams meeting with us, where the ‘Fireside Chat’ was recorded. The clinical expert was given an online briefing ahead of the recording where queries were addressed. We acted as case presenters and posed questions to facilitate a discussion with the clinical expert, with the aim of sharing insights into the clinical reasoning process, for a range of cases. The chats finished with summary learning points and links to further reading. The ‘Fireside Chat’ recordings were made available on the virtual learning environments for the associated medical schools. The full recordings were presented as long-form discussions on a sub-specialty topic, covering several cases lasting up to 1 hour in total. Students were directed to these as part of placement induction and were encouraged to use these as the basis for further learning and discussion during clinical placements.</p><p>The bank of resources was well-received by students, with positive evaluation feedback. Students suggested potential future topics for the chats. The process was efficient, with a relatively short preparation time. Clinical experts enjoyed the process, and appreciated the time-efficient way in which they were able to share their insights. This offers a solution, whereby clinical teams can be guided in using this simple process, to develop high quality video resources, to support education in clinical reasoning.</p><p>After the initial video, we piloted a student-led approach, whereby medical students presented anonymised cases to a subject expert. This is a scalable solution and has inherent benefits relating to the peer-led learning approach. Although the long-form videos did not require significant editing, we are developing shorter focused versions, where take-home points are presented in smaller chunks in an interactive format.</p><p><b>Zaki Hassan-Smith:</b> Conceptualization; methodology; supervision; resources; conceptualization; writing—original draft; methodology; project administration; supervision. <b>Ghaniah Hassan-Smith:</b> Conceptualization; methodology; supervision; resources; conceptualization; writing—original draft; methodology; project administration; supervision.</p><p>The authors have no conflicts of interest or acknowledgements to make.</p><p>This work has been deemed exempt from ethical review at the authors institution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"58 11\",\"pages\":\"1377-1378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15497\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.15497\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.15497","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1 COVID-19 大流行后,学生们到一些专科门诊就诊的机会减少,这影响了他们接受临床推理教育的机会,包括围绕诊断测试的选择和解释、问题识别和管理方法的讨论。学生和临床医生的反馈证实,随着临床压力的增加、远程会诊的使用以及临床工作计划中教育时间的减少,这在某些医学专科仍然是一个挑战。我们在教学医院的内分泌学和神经病学临床轮转学生中试行了这一方法。我们根据各专科临床课程的学习成果选择并映射了主题。我们准备了临床病例的 Powerpoint 演示,包括每个亚专科领域的临床表现和病史、检查结果、初步检查和持续治疗的细节。我们确定了临床专家,他们都是对相关亚专科感兴趣的顾问医生(例如,内分泌科包括骨代谢、肾上腺、垂体和甲状腺疾病等)。我们向临床专家提供了有关学习目标和形式注意事项的指导,并邀请他们与我们一起参加 MS Teams 会议,在会上记录 "炉边谈话"。在录制之前,我们会向临床专家提供在线简报,解答他们的疑问。我们作为病例介绍人,提出问题以促进与临床专家的讨论,目的是就一系列病例分享对临床推理过程的见解。聊天结束后,我们总结了学习要点,并提供了进一步阅读的链接。炉边谈话 "的录音可在相关医学院的虚拟学习环境中获取。完整的录音以长篇幅讨论的形式呈现,涉及一个子专业主题,涵盖多个病例,总时长长达 1 小时。作为实习指导的一部分,学生被引导观看这些内容,并鼓励他们在临床实习期间以这些内容为基础进一步学习和讨论。学生们提出了未来可能的聊天主题。整个过程非常高效,准备时间相对较短。临床专家们很享受这一过程,并对这种省时高效的分享方式表示赞赏。这提供了一种解决方案,可以指导临床团队使用这种简单的流程开发高质量的视频资源,以支持临床推理教育。在最初的视频之后,我们试行了一种由学生主导的方法,让医学生向学科专家展示匿名病例。这是一种可扩展的解决方案,具有与同伴引导式学习方法相关的固有优势。虽然长版视频不需要大量编辑,但我们正在开发重点突出的短版视频,以互动形式分小块介绍要点:构思;方法;监督;资源;构思;写作-原稿;方法;项目管理;监督。加尼亚-哈桑-史密斯构思;方法;监督;资源;构思;撰写-原稿;方法;项目管理;监督。作者没有利益冲突或致谢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fireside chats: Using recorded case-based discussions with medical experts to teach clinical reasoning

Consensus opinion suggests that students and trainees receive insufficient teaching on clinical reasoning.1 Following the COVID-19 pandemic, students had reduced access to some specialist clinics, which impacted on their educational opportunities within clinical reasoning, including discussions around choice and interpretation of diagnostic tests, problem identification and management approach. Feedback from students and clinicians, confirmed that this remains a challenge in some medical specialities with increasing clinical pressures, use of remote consultations and reductions in educational time in clinical job plans.

To address this, we devised an efficient process whereby a bank of video resources, called ‘Fireside Chats’ was created and made available to students to support the development of clinical reasoning abilities. This was piloted for students rotating through clinical rotations in Endocrinology and Neurology, within our teaching hospital. Topics were selected and mapped to the learning outcomes of the Clinical Curriculum in each specialty. We prepared Powerpoint presentations of example clinical cases, including details of clinical presentation and history, examination findings, initial investigations and ongoing management, under each sub-specialty area. We identified clinical experts, who were consultant physicians with relevant sub-specialty interests (e.g. for endocrinology these included metabolic bone, adrenal, pituitary and thyroid disease etc.). The clinical experts were given guidance on learning objectives, and format considerations and were invited to an MS Teams meeting with us, where the ‘Fireside Chat’ was recorded. The clinical expert was given an online briefing ahead of the recording where queries were addressed. We acted as case presenters and posed questions to facilitate a discussion with the clinical expert, with the aim of sharing insights into the clinical reasoning process, for a range of cases. The chats finished with summary learning points and links to further reading. The ‘Fireside Chat’ recordings were made available on the virtual learning environments for the associated medical schools. The full recordings were presented as long-form discussions on a sub-specialty topic, covering several cases lasting up to 1 hour in total. Students were directed to these as part of placement induction and were encouraged to use these as the basis for further learning and discussion during clinical placements.

The bank of resources was well-received by students, with positive evaluation feedback. Students suggested potential future topics for the chats. The process was efficient, with a relatively short preparation time. Clinical experts enjoyed the process, and appreciated the time-efficient way in which they were able to share their insights. This offers a solution, whereby clinical teams can be guided in using this simple process, to develop high quality video resources, to support education in clinical reasoning.

After the initial video, we piloted a student-led approach, whereby medical students presented anonymised cases to a subject expert. This is a scalable solution and has inherent benefits relating to the peer-led learning approach. Although the long-form videos did not require significant editing, we are developing shorter focused versions, where take-home points are presented in smaller chunks in an interactive format.

Zaki Hassan-Smith: Conceptualization; methodology; supervision; resources; conceptualization; writing—original draft; methodology; project administration; supervision. Ghaniah Hassan-Smith: Conceptualization; methodology; supervision; resources; conceptualization; writing—original draft; methodology; project administration; supervision.

The authors have no conflicts of interest or acknowledgements to make.

This work has been deemed exempt from ethical review at the authors institution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信