实施世界卫生组织标准,以服务使用者的视角为数据来源,评估设施层面的儿科护理质量:意大利的一项多中心质量改进研究。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Silvia Bressan, Giada Sartor, Paolo Dalena, Elia Balestra, Anna Madera, Federico Marchetti, Maria Carla Finocchiaro, Francesca Tirelli, Enrico Felici, Alessia Marcellino, Silvia Fasoli, Paola Cogo, Roberta Parrino, Benmario Castaldo, Rosa Santangelo, Maristella Toniutti, Giuseppina De Rosa, Valentina Baltag, Marzia Lazzerini
{"title":"实施世界卫生组织标准,以服务使用者的视角为数据来源,评估设施层面的儿科护理质量:意大利的一项多中心质量改进研究。","authors":"Silvia Bressan, Giada Sartor, Paolo Dalena, Elia Balestra, Anna Madera, Federico Marchetti, Maria Carla Finocchiaro, Francesca Tirelli, Enrico Felici, Alessia Marcellino, Silvia Fasoli, Paola Cogo, Roberta Parrino, Benmario Castaldo, Rosa Santangelo, Maristella Toniutti, Giuseppina De Rosa, Valentina Baltag, Marzia Lazzerini","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is little experience in the use of the WHO Standards for improving the quality of care (QOC) for children at the facility level. We describe the use of 75 WHO Standard based Quality Measures to assess paediatric QOC, using service users as a source of data, in Italy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In a cross-sectional study including 12 hospitals, parents/caregivers of admitted children completed a validated questionnaire including 75 Quality Measures: 40 pertinent to the domain of experience of care; 25 to physical/structural resources; 10 to COVID-19 reorganisational changes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Answers from 1482 service users were analysed. <i>Physical resources</i> was the domain with the higher frequency of reported gaps in QOC, with key gaps (higher rates of responders reporting need for improvement and low variability across centres) being: (1) quality of meals (48.1%; range across facilities: 35.3%-61.7%); (2) presence of cooking areas (50.9%; range: 34.6%-70.0%); (3) spaces for family/friends (51.3%; range: 31.8%-77.4%). For <i>experience of care</i>, the most critical gap was the information on the rights of the child (76.6%; range: 59.9%-90.4%), with most other Quality Measures showing an overall frequency of reported need for improvement ranging between 5% and 35%. For <i>reorganisational changes due to COVID-19</i> an improvement was felt necessary by <25% of responders in all Quality Measures, with low variability across centres. At the multivariate analyses, factors significantly associated with the QOC Index largely varied by QOC domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the 75 prioritised Quality Measures, specific to service users' perspective, enabled the identification of both general and facility-specific gaps in QOC. Based on these findings, quality improvement initiatives shall focus on a core list of selected Quality Measures common to all facilities, plus on an additional list of Quality Measures as more relevant in each facility.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of the WHO Standards to assess quality of paediatric care at the facility level using service users' perspective as source of data: a multicentre quality improvement study in Italy.\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Bressan, Giada Sartor, Paolo Dalena, Elia Balestra, Anna Madera, Federico Marchetti, Maria Carla Finocchiaro, Francesca Tirelli, Enrico Felici, Alessia Marcellino, Silvia Fasoli, Paola Cogo, Roberta Parrino, Benmario Castaldo, Rosa Santangelo, Maristella Toniutti, Giuseppina De Rosa, Valentina Baltag, Marzia Lazzerini\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is little experience in the use of the WHO Standards for improving the quality of care (QOC) for children at the facility level. We describe the use of 75 WHO Standard based Quality Measures to assess paediatric QOC, using service users as a source of data, in Italy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In a cross-sectional study including 12 hospitals, parents/caregivers of admitted children completed a validated questionnaire including 75 Quality Measures: 40 pertinent to the domain of experience of care; 25 to physical/structural resources; 10 to COVID-19 reorganisational changes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Answers from 1482 service users were analysed. <i>Physical resources</i> was the domain with the higher frequency of reported gaps in QOC, with key gaps (higher rates of responders reporting need for improvement and low variability across centres) being: (1) quality of meals (48.1%; range across facilities: 35.3%-61.7%); (2) presence of cooking areas (50.9%; range: 34.6%-70.0%); (3) spaces for family/friends (51.3%; range: 31.8%-77.4%). For <i>experience of care</i>, the most critical gap was the information on the rights of the child (76.6%; range: 59.9%-90.4%), with most other Quality Measures showing an overall frequency of reported need for improvement ranging between 5% and 35%. For <i>reorganisational changes due to COVID-19</i> an improvement was felt necessary by <25% of responders in all Quality Measures, with low variability across centres. At the multivariate analyses, factors significantly associated with the QOC Index largely varied by QOC domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the 75 prioritised Quality Measures, specific to service users' perspective, enabled the identification of both general and facility-specific gaps in QOC. Based on these findings, quality improvement initiatives shall focus on a core list of selected Quality Measures common to all facilities, plus on an additional list of Quality Measures as more relevant in each facility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:使用世界卫生组织的标准来提高医疗机构的儿童护理质量(QOC)的经验很少。我们介绍了在意大利使用 75 项基于世界卫生组织标准的质量衡量标准来评估儿科护理质量的情况,并将服务使用者作为数据来源:研究设计:在一项包括 12 家医院的横断面研究中,入院儿童的父母/监护人填写了一份经过验证的调查问卷,其中包括 75 项质量衡量标准:其中 40 项与护理体验相关;25 项与物质/结构资源相关;10 项与 COVID-19 重组变化相关。对问卷进行了单变量和多变量分析:对 1482 名服务用户的回答进行了分析。物质资源是 QOC 中报告差距频率较高的领域,主要差距(报告需要改进的答卷人比例较高,各中心之间差异较小)为:(1) 膳食质量(48.1%;各设施的范围:35.3%-61.7%);(2) 是否有烹饪区(50.9%;范围:34.6%-70.0%);(3) 供家人/朋友使用的空间(51.3%;范围:31.8%-77.4%)。在护理体验方面,最关键的差距是有关儿童权利的信息(76.6%;范围:59.9%-90.4%),其他大多数质量衡量指标显示需要改进的总体频率在 5%至 35%之间。结论认为 COVID-19 引起的重组变化需要改进:从服务使用者的角度出发,使用 75 项优先质量衡量标准,可以找出质量控制目标的一般差距和具体设施的差距。基于这些发现,质量改进措施应重点关注所有设施通用的质量衡量标准核心清单,以及与各设施更相关的质量衡量标准附加清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of the WHO Standards to assess quality of paediatric care at the facility level using service users' perspective as source of data: a multicentre quality improvement study in Italy.

Objectives: There is little experience in the use of the WHO Standards for improving the quality of care (QOC) for children at the facility level. We describe the use of 75 WHO Standard based Quality Measures to assess paediatric QOC, using service users as a source of data, in Italy.

Study design: In a cross-sectional study including 12 hospitals, parents/caregivers of admitted children completed a validated questionnaire including 75 Quality Measures: 40 pertinent to the domain of experience of care; 25 to physical/structural resources; 10 to COVID-19 reorganisational changes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.

Results: Answers from 1482 service users were analysed. Physical resources was the domain with the higher frequency of reported gaps in QOC, with key gaps (higher rates of responders reporting need for improvement and low variability across centres) being: (1) quality of meals (48.1%; range across facilities: 35.3%-61.7%); (2) presence of cooking areas (50.9%; range: 34.6%-70.0%); (3) spaces for family/friends (51.3%; range: 31.8%-77.4%). For experience of care, the most critical gap was the information on the rights of the child (76.6%; range: 59.9%-90.4%), with most other Quality Measures showing an overall frequency of reported need for improvement ranging between 5% and 35%. For reorganisational changes due to COVID-19 an improvement was felt necessary by <25% of responders in all Quality Measures, with low variability across centres. At the multivariate analyses, factors significantly associated with the QOC Index largely varied by QOC domain.

Conclusions: The use of the 75 prioritised Quality Measures, specific to service users' perspective, enabled the identification of both general and facility-specific gaps in QOC. Based on these findings, quality improvement initiatives shall focus on a core list of selected Quality Measures common to all facilities, plus on an additional list of Quality Measures as more relevant in each facility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信