食物无保障妇女的创伤暴露邻近性与饮食紊乱诊断有关。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
{"title":"食物无保障妇女的创伤暴露邻近性与饮食紊乱诊断有关。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Trauma exposure is a risk factor for both food insecurity (FI) and increased eating disorder (ED) pathology. The purpose of this study was to explore the relation between trauma and ED diagnosis in a sample of women experiencing FI. A cross-sectional analysis of surveys from 99 women with self-reported FI (54% White; mean [<em>SD</em>] age = 40.26 [14.33] years) in the United States was employed. Participants completed online surveys including the Life Events Checklist (LEC) questionnaire, General Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and an interview comprised of the Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) and Eating Disorder Diagnostic Interview (EDDI). LEC traumatic events were weighted by proximity: events experienced directly were weighted by a factor of 3, witnessed by 2, learned about by 1, and summed to a total weighted score. ED diagnosis in the past 12 months was assessed via the EDDI using DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. A binary logistic regression model tested associations between weighted trauma score, FI, and ED diagnosis. Weighted trauma score significantly predicted any ED diagnosis (<em>OR</em> = 1.039, <em>p</em> = .016), but FI severity did not (<em>OR</em> = .746, <em>p</em> = .101). These results suggest trauma proximity predicts ED diagnosis beyond that of FI severity and may be an important component of the association between FI and ED pathology. Future work may consider evaluating longitudinal symptoms of trauma and trauma severity in relation to FI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trauma exposure proximity associated with eating disorder diagnosis in women with food insecurity\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Trauma exposure is a risk factor for both food insecurity (FI) and increased eating disorder (ED) pathology. The purpose of this study was to explore the relation between trauma and ED diagnosis in a sample of women experiencing FI. A cross-sectional analysis of surveys from 99 women with self-reported FI (54% White; mean [<em>SD</em>] age = 40.26 [14.33] years) in the United States was employed. Participants completed online surveys including the Life Events Checklist (LEC) questionnaire, General Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and an interview comprised of the Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) and Eating Disorder Diagnostic Interview (EDDI). LEC traumatic events were weighted by proximity: events experienced directly were weighted by a factor of 3, witnessed by 2, learned about by 1, and summed to a total weighted score. ED diagnosis in the past 12 months was assessed via the EDDI using DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. A binary logistic regression model tested associations between weighted trauma score, FI, and ED diagnosis. Weighted trauma score significantly predicted any ED diagnosis (<em>OR</em> = 1.039, <em>p</em> = .016), but FI severity did not (<em>OR</em> = .746, <em>p</em> = .101). These results suggest trauma proximity predicts ED diagnosis beyond that of FI severity and may be an important component of the association between FI and ED pathology. Future work may consider evaluating longitudinal symptoms of trauma and trauma severity in relation to FI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666324004562\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666324004562","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

遭受心理创伤是导致食物无保障(FI)和饮食失调(ED)病症增加的风险因素。本研究的目的是在经历过 FI 的女性样本中探索创伤与 ED 诊断之间的关系。研究采用横断面分析法,对美国 99 名自述有 FI 的女性(54% 为白人;平均 [SD] 年龄 = 40.26 [14.33] 岁)进行了调查。参与者完成了在线调查,包括生活事件清单(LEC)问卷、一般焦虑症-7、患者健康问卷-9,以及由家庭食品安全调查模块(HFSSM)和进食障碍诊断访谈(EDDI)组成的访谈。LEC 创伤事件按距离远近加权:直接经历的事件加权系数为 3,目睹的事件加权系数为 2,了解到的事件加权系数为 1,加总后得出加权总分。过去 12 个月中的 ED 诊断根据 DSM-5 诊断标准通过 EDDI 进行评估。二元逻辑回归模型检验了加权创伤得分、FI 和 ED 诊断之间的关联。加权创伤得分可明显预测任何 ED 诊断(OR = 1.039,p = .016),但 FI 严重程度却不能(OR = 0.746,p = .101)。这些结果表明,创伤邻近程度对 ED 诊断的预测超出了 FI 严重程度的预测,并且可能是 FI 与 ED 病理关联的一个重要组成部分。未来的工作可能会考虑评估与FI相关的纵向创伤症状和创伤严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trauma exposure proximity associated with eating disorder diagnosis in women with food insecurity

Trauma exposure is a risk factor for both food insecurity (FI) and increased eating disorder (ED) pathology. The purpose of this study was to explore the relation between trauma and ED diagnosis in a sample of women experiencing FI. A cross-sectional analysis of surveys from 99 women with self-reported FI (54% White; mean [SD] age = 40.26 [14.33] years) in the United States was employed. Participants completed online surveys including the Life Events Checklist (LEC) questionnaire, General Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and an interview comprised of the Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) and Eating Disorder Diagnostic Interview (EDDI). LEC traumatic events were weighted by proximity: events experienced directly were weighted by a factor of 3, witnessed by 2, learned about by 1, and summed to a total weighted score. ED diagnosis in the past 12 months was assessed via the EDDI using DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. A binary logistic regression model tested associations between weighted trauma score, FI, and ED diagnosis. Weighted trauma score significantly predicted any ED diagnosis (OR = 1.039, p = .016), but FI severity did not (OR = .746, p = .101). These results suggest trauma proximity predicts ED diagnosis beyond that of FI severity and may be an important component of the association between FI and ED pathology. Future work may consider evaluating longitudinal symptoms of trauma and trauma severity in relation to FI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信