根据重症监护病房耐多药细菌和白色念珠菌的类型制定感染预防和控制策略:包括病原体 R0 和成本效益分析在内的务实案例。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Chiara Fanelli, Laura Pistidda, Pierpaolo Terragni, Daniela Pasero
{"title":"根据重症监护病房耐多药细菌和白色念珠菌的类型制定感染预防和控制策略:包括病原体 R0 和成本效益分析在内的务实案例。","authors":"Chiara Fanelli, Laura Pistidda, Pierpaolo Terragni, Daniela Pasero","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13080789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) outbreaks have been steadily increasing in intensive care units (ICUs). Still, healthcare institutions and workers (HCWs) have not reached unanimity on how and when to implement infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies. We aimed to provide a pragmatic physician practice-oriented resume of strategies towards different MDRO outbreaks in ICUs. We performed a narrative review on IPC in ICUs, investigating patient-to-staff ratios; education, isolation, decolonization, screening, and hygiene practices; outbreak reporting; cost-effectiveness; reproduction numbers (R<sub>0</sub>); and future perspectives. The most effective IPC strategy remains unknown. Most studies focus on a specific pathogen or disease, making the clinician lose sight of the big picture. IPC strategies have proven their cost-effectiveness regardless of typology, country, and pathogen. A standardized, universal, pragmatic protocol for HCW education should be elaborated. Likewise, the elaboration of a rapid outbreak recognition tool (i.e., an easy-to-use mathematical model) would improve early diagnosis and prevent spreading. Further studies are needed to express views in favor or against MDRO decolonization. New promising strategies are emerging and need to be tested in the field. The lack of IPC strategy application has made and still makes ICUs major MDRO reservoirs in the community. In a not-too-distant future, genetic engineering and phage therapies could represent a plot twist in MDRO IPC strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11351734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infection Prevention and Control Strategies According to the Type of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria and <i>Candida auris</i> in Intensive Care Units: A Pragmatic Resume including Pathogens R<sub>0</sub> and a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chiara Fanelli, Laura Pistidda, Pierpaolo Terragni, Daniela Pasero\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antibiotics13080789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) outbreaks have been steadily increasing in intensive care units (ICUs). Still, healthcare institutions and workers (HCWs) have not reached unanimity on how and when to implement infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies. We aimed to provide a pragmatic physician practice-oriented resume of strategies towards different MDRO outbreaks in ICUs. We performed a narrative review on IPC in ICUs, investigating patient-to-staff ratios; education, isolation, decolonization, screening, and hygiene practices; outbreak reporting; cost-effectiveness; reproduction numbers (R<sub>0</sub>); and future perspectives. The most effective IPC strategy remains unknown. Most studies focus on a specific pathogen or disease, making the clinician lose sight of the big picture. IPC strategies have proven their cost-effectiveness regardless of typology, country, and pathogen. A standardized, universal, pragmatic protocol for HCW education should be elaborated. Likewise, the elaboration of a rapid outbreak recognition tool (i.e., an easy-to-use mathematical model) would improve early diagnosis and prevent spreading. Further studies are needed to express views in favor or against MDRO decolonization. New promising strategies are emerging and need to be tested in the field. The lack of IPC strategy application has made and still makes ICUs major MDRO reservoirs in the community. In a not-too-distant future, genetic engineering and phage therapies could represent a plot twist in MDRO IPC strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11351734/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13080789\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13080789","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重症监护病房(ICU)中爆发的耐多药生物(MDRO)疫情一直在稳步上升。尽管如此,医疗机构和医务人员(HCWs)在如何以及何时实施感染预防和控制(IPC)策略方面仍未达成一致。我们的目的是针对 ICU 中爆发的不同 MDRO,提供一份务实的、以医生实践为导向的策略简历。我们对 ICU 中的 IPC 进行了叙述性回顾,调查了患者与工作人员的比例、教育、隔离、去菌、筛查和卫生实践、疫情报告、成本效益、繁殖数量 (R0) 以及未来展望。最有效的 IPC 策略仍是未知数。大多数研究侧重于特定的病原体或疾病,使临床医生忽视了全局。IPC 策略已证明其成本效益与类型、国家和病原体无关。应为医护人员教育制定标准化、通用、务实的方案。同样,制定一个快速疫情识别工具(即一个易于使用的数学模型)将会改善早期诊断并防止疫情扩散。还需要进一步的研究来表达对 MDRO 去殖民化的支持或反对意见。新的有前途的策略正在出现,需要在实地进行测试。缺乏 IPC 策略的应用已经并仍将使 ICU 成为社区中主要的 MDRO 储藏库。在不远的将来,基因工程和噬菌体疗法可能会成为 MDRO IPC 策略的转折点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Infection Prevention and Control Strategies According to the Type of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria and Candida auris in Intensive Care Units: A Pragmatic Resume including Pathogens R0 and a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) outbreaks have been steadily increasing in intensive care units (ICUs). Still, healthcare institutions and workers (HCWs) have not reached unanimity on how and when to implement infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies. We aimed to provide a pragmatic physician practice-oriented resume of strategies towards different MDRO outbreaks in ICUs. We performed a narrative review on IPC in ICUs, investigating patient-to-staff ratios; education, isolation, decolonization, screening, and hygiene practices; outbreak reporting; cost-effectiveness; reproduction numbers (R0); and future perspectives. The most effective IPC strategy remains unknown. Most studies focus on a specific pathogen or disease, making the clinician lose sight of the big picture. IPC strategies have proven their cost-effectiveness regardless of typology, country, and pathogen. A standardized, universal, pragmatic protocol for HCW education should be elaborated. Likewise, the elaboration of a rapid outbreak recognition tool (i.e., an easy-to-use mathematical model) would improve early diagnosis and prevent spreading. Further studies are needed to express views in favor or against MDRO decolonization. New promising strategies are emerging and need to be tested in the field. The lack of IPC strategy application has made and still makes ICUs major MDRO reservoirs in the community. In a not-too-distant future, genetic engineering and phage therapies could represent a plot twist in MDRO IPC strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信