探索教师对人工智能教育的认识:北塞浦路斯案例研究。

IF 3 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ahmet Güneyli, Nazım Serkan Burgul, Sonay Dericioğlu, Nazan Cenkova, Sinem Becan, Şeyma Elif Şimşek, Hüseyin Güneralp
{"title":"探索教师对人工智能教育的认识:北塞浦路斯案例研究。","authors":"Ahmet Güneyli, Nazım Serkan Burgul, Sonay Dericioğlu, Nazan Cenkova, Sinem Becan, Şeyma Elif Şimşek, Hüseyin Güneralp","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe14080156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the level of awareness among teachers regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, focusing on whether this awareness varies according to socio-demographic characteristics, access to technology, and specific knowledge and beliefs about AI. Conducted in Northern Cyprus during the 2023-2024 academic year, this study employed a survey model with purposive and snowball sampling methods, involving 164 teachers. Teachers at different levels, namely, primary school, secondary school, high school, and university, were included in this study. The \"Artificial Intelligence Awareness Scale\", developed by Ferikoğlu and Akgün (2022), was used to measure AI awareness. Data normality was verified through skewness and kurtosis values, allowing for parametric statistical tests such as t-tests, one-way ANOVA, logistic regression, and chi-square analysis. This study explored the distribution of AI use across different school types and educational levels and assessed the impact of sub-dimensions of AI awareness on its application in teaching. Findings revealed no significant influence of teacher demographics (age, gender, education level, type of school, institution level, and monthly income) on AI awareness. However, usage patterns indicated that university lecturers were more likely to incorporate AI in their teaching, followed by primary and high school teachers, with secondary school teachers using it the least. A Multilayer Neural Network Analysis identified practical knowledge as the most critical factor influencing the use of AI in teaching (importance weight of 0.450), followed by beliefs and attitudes (0.298), relatability (0.148), and theoretical knowledge (0.104). These results highlight the importance of practical knowledge for fostering AI integration in educational practices, underscoring significant implications for teacher training and professional development programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"14 8","pages":"2358-2376"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11354280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Teacher Awareness of Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Case Study from Northern Cyprus.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmet Güneyli, Nazım Serkan Burgul, Sonay Dericioğlu, Nazan Cenkova, Sinem Becan, Şeyma Elif Şimşek, Hüseyin Güneralp\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ejihpe14080156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates the level of awareness among teachers regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, focusing on whether this awareness varies according to socio-demographic characteristics, access to technology, and specific knowledge and beliefs about AI. Conducted in Northern Cyprus during the 2023-2024 academic year, this study employed a survey model with purposive and snowball sampling methods, involving 164 teachers. Teachers at different levels, namely, primary school, secondary school, high school, and university, were included in this study. The \\\"Artificial Intelligence Awareness Scale\\\", developed by Ferikoğlu and Akgün (2022), was used to measure AI awareness. Data normality was verified through skewness and kurtosis values, allowing for parametric statistical tests such as t-tests, one-way ANOVA, logistic regression, and chi-square analysis. This study explored the distribution of AI use across different school types and educational levels and assessed the impact of sub-dimensions of AI awareness on its application in teaching. Findings revealed no significant influence of teacher demographics (age, gender, education level, type of school, institution level, and monthly income) on AI awareness. However, usage patterns indicated that university lecturers were more likely to incorporate AI in their teaching, followed by primary and high school teachers, with secondary school teachers using it the least. A Multilayer Neural Network Analysis identified practical knowledge as the most critical factor influencing the use of AI in teaching (importance weight of 0.450), followed by beliefs and attitudes (0.298), relatability (0.148), and theoretical knowledge (0.104). These results highlight the importance of practical knowledge for fostering AI integration in educational practices, underscoring significant implications for teacher training and professional development programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education\",\"volume\":\"14 8\",\"pages\":\"2358-2376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11354280/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14080156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14080156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了教师对在教育中使用人工智能(AI)的认识水平,重点关注这种认识是否因社会人口特征、技术获取途径以及对人工智能的具体知识和信念而有所不同。本研究于 2023-2024 学年在北塞浦路斯进行,采用了调查模式,采用目的性抽样和滚雪球抽样方法,涉及 164 名教师。小学、中学、高中和大学等不同年级的教师均被纳入本研究。研究采用 Ferikoğlu 和 Akgün(2022 年)编制的 "人工智能意识量表 "来测量人工智能意识。通过偏度和峰度值验证了数据的正态性,可进行 t 检验、单向方差分析、逻辑回归和卡方分析等参数统计检验。本研究探讨了人工智能在不同学校类型和教育水平中的使用分布情况,并评估了人工智能意识的各个子维度对其在教学中应用的影响。研究结果显示,教师的人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、教育水平、学校类型、机构级别和月收入)对人工智能意识没有明显影响。然而,使用模式表明,大学讲师更有可能将人工智能应用于教学,其次是小学和中学教师,而中学教师使用人工智能的可能性最小。多层神经网络分析表明,实践知识是影响在教学中使用人工智能的最关键因素(重要性权重为 0.450),其次是信念和态度(0.298)、亲和力(0.148)和理论知识(0.104)。这些结果凸显了实践知识对于促进人工智能融入教育实践的重要性,对教师培训和专业发展计划具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Teacher Awareness of Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Case Study from Northern Cyprus.

This study investigates the level of awareness among teachers regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, focusing on whether this awareness varies according to socio-demographic characteristics, access to technology, and specific knowledge and beliefs about AI. Conducted in Northern Cyprus during the 2023-2024 academic year, this study employed a survey model with purposive and snowball sampling methods, involving 164 teachers. Teachers at different levels, namely, primary school, secondary school, high school, and university, were included in this study. The "Artificial Intelligence Awareness Scale", developed by Ferikoğlu and Akgün (2022), was used to measure AI awareness. Data normality was verified through skewness and kurtosis values, allowing for parametric statistical tests such as t-tests, one-way ANOVA, logistic regression, and chi-square analysis. This study explored the distribution of AI use across different school types and educational levels and assessed the impact of sub-dimensions of AI awareness on its application in teaching. Findings revealed no significant influence of teacher demographics (age, gender, education level, type of school, institution level, and monthly income) on AI awareness. However, usage patterns indicated that university lecturers were more likely to incorporate AI in their teaching, followed by primary and high school teachers, with secondary school teachers using it the least. A Multilayer Neural Network Analysis identified practical knowledge as the most critical factor influencing the use of AI in teaching (importance weight of 0.450), followed by beliefs and attitudes (0.298), relatability (0.148), and theoretical knowledge (0.104). These results highlight the importance of practical knowledge for fostering AI integration in educational practices, underscoring significant implications for teacher training and professional development programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信