Susanne Spittel, Thomas Meyer, Ute Weyen, Torsten Grehl, Patrick Weydt, Robert Steinbach, Susanne Petri, Petra Baum, Moritz Metelmann, Anne-Dorte Sperfeld, Dagmar Kettemann, Jenny Norden, Annekathrin Rödiger, Benjamin Ilse, Julian Grosskreutz, Barbara Hildebrandt, Bertram Walter, Christoph Münch, André Maier
{"title":"肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症患者对辅助机械臂的期望和体验:一项多中心观察研究。","authors":"Susanne Spittel, Thomas Meyer, Ute Weyen, Torsten Grehl, Patrick Weydt, Robert Steinbach, Susanne Petri, Petra Baum, Moritz Metelmann, Anne-Dorte Sperfeld, Dagmar Kettemann, Jenny Norden, Annekathrin Rödiger, Benjamin Ilse, Julian Grosskreutz, Barbara Hildebrandt, Bertram Walter, Christoph Münch, André Maier","doi":"10.1186/s42466-024-00342-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Robotic arms are innovative assistive devices for ALS patients with progressive motor deficits of arms and hands. The objective was to explore the patients´ expectations towards a robotic arm system and to assess the actual experiences after the provision of the device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted at 9 ALS centers in Germany. ALS-related functional deficits were assessed using the ALS-Functional Rating Scale-revised (ALSFRS-R). Motor deficit of the upper limbs was determined using a subscore of three arm-related items of the ALSFRS-R (items 4-6; range 0-12 points). User expectations before provision (expectation group, n = 85) and user experiences after provision (experience group, n = 14) with the device (JACO Assistive Robotic Device, Kinova, Boisbriand, QC, Canada) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the total cohort, mean ALSFRS-R subscore for arm function was 1.7 (SD: 2.0, 0-9) demonstrating a severe functional deficit of the upper limbs. In the expectation group (n = 85), the following use cases of the robotic arm have been prioritized: handling objects (89%), close-body movements (88%), pressing buttons (87%), serving drinks (86%), and opening cabinets and doors (85%). In the experience group (n = 14), handling objects (79%), serving drinks (79%), near-body movements (71%), pushing buttons (71%), serving food (64%), and opening doors (64%) were the most frequent used cases. Most patients used the device daily (71.4%, n = 10), and 28.6% (n = 4) several times a week. All patients of the experience group found the device helpful, felt safe while using the device, and were satisfied with its reliability. NPS of the assistive robotic arm revealed 64% \"promoters\" (strong recommendation), 29% \"indifferents\" (uncertain recommendation) and 7% \"detractors\" (no recommendation). Total NPS was + 57 demonstrating strong patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initiation of procurement with a robotic assistive arm was confined to patients with severe functional deficit of the upper limbs. User experience underlined the wide spectrum of use cases of assistive robotic arms in ALS. The positive user experience together with high satisfaction underscore that robotic arm systems serve as a valuable treatment option in ALS patients with severe motor deficits of the arms.</p>","PeriodicalId":94156,"journal":{"name":"Neurological research and practice","volume":"6 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User expectations and experiences of an assistive robotic arm in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a multicenter observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Susanne Spittel, Thomas Meyer, Ute Weyen, Torsten Grehl, Patrick Weydt, Robert Steinbach, Susanne Petri, Petra Baum, Moritz Metelmann, Anne-Dorte Sperfeld, Dagmar Kettemann, Jenny Norden, Annekathrin Rödiger, Benjamin Ilse, Julian Grosskreutz, Barbara Hildebrandt, Bertram Walter, Christoph Münch, André Maier\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42466-024-00342-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Robotic arms are innovative assistive devices for ALS patients with progressive motor deficits of arms and hands. The objective was to explore the patients´ expectations towards a robotic arm system and to assess the actual experiences after the provision of the device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted at 9 ALS centers in Germany. ALS-related functional deficits were assessed using the ALS-Functional Rating Scale-revised (ALSFRS-R). Motor deficit of the upper limbs was determined using a subscore of three arm-related items of the ALSFRS-R (items 4-6; range 0-12 points). User expectations before provision (expectation group, n = 85) and user experiences after provision (experience group, n = 14) with the device (JACO Assistive Robotic Device, Kinova, Boisbriand, QC, Canada) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the total cohort, mean ALSFRS-R subscore for arm function was 1.7 (SD: 2.0, 0-9) demonstrating a severe functional deficit of the upper limbs. In the expectation group (n = 85), the following use cases of the robotic arm have been prioritized: handling objects (89%), close-body movements (88%), pressing buttons (87%), serving drinks (86%), and opening cabinets and doors (85%). In the experience group (n = 14), handling objects (79%), serving drinks (79%), near-body movements (71%), pushing buttons (71%), serving food (64%), and opening doors (64%) were the most frequent used cases. Most patients used the device daily (71.4%, n = 10), and 28.6% (n = 4) several times a week. All patients of the experience group found the device helpful, felt safe while using the device, and were satisfied with its reliability. NPS of the assistive robotic arm revealed 64% \\\"promoters\\\" (strong recommendation), 29% \\\"indifferents\\\" (uncertain recommendation) and 7% \\\"detractors\\\" (no recommendation). Total NPS was + 57 demonstrating strong patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initiation of procurement with a robotic assistive arm was confined to patients with severe functional deficit of the upper limbs. User experience underlined the wide spectrum of use cases of assistive robotic arms in ALS. The positive user experience together with high satisfaction underscore that robotic arm systems serve as a valuable treatment option in ALS patients with severe motor deficits of the arms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological research and practice\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344397/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-024-00342-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-024-00342-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:机械臂是一种创新型辅助设备,适用于手臂和手部进行性运动障碍的 ALS 患者。研究目的是探讨患者对机械臂系统的期望,并评估患者在使用该设备后的实际体验:在德国的 9 个 ALS 中心开展了一项前瞻性观察研究。采用 ALS 功能评定量表修订版(ALSFRS-R)评估与 ALS 相关的功能障碍。上肢的运动障碍通过 ALSFRS-R 中与手臂相关的三个项目(项目 4-6;范围 0-12 分)的子分数来确定。评估了用户在使用该装置(JACO辅助机器人装置,Kinova公司,加拿大Boisbriand市)前的期望值(期望值组,n = 85)和使用该装置后的体验(体验组,n = 14):在所有组别中,平均 ALSFRS-R 手臂功能子评分为 1.7(标准差:2.0,0-9),表明上肢功能严重不足。在期望组(n = 85)中,机器人手臂的优先使用情况如下:搬运物品(89%)、近身运动(88%)、按键(87%)、提供饮料(86%)以及打开橱柜和门(85%)。在经验组(n = 14)中,最常使用的情况是搬运物体(79%)、端饮料(79%)、近身动作(71%)、按按钮(71%)、端食物(64%)和开门(64%)。大多数患者每天使用该装置(71.4%,n = 10),28.6%(n = 4)每周使用数次。体验组的所有患者都认为该装置很有用,使用时感觉安全,并对其可靠性感到满意。辅助机械臂的 NPS 显示,64% 为 "推荐者"(强烈推荐),29% 为 "无所谓者"(不确定推荐),7% 为 "反对者"(不推荐)。总的 NPS 为 + 57,表明患者非常满意:结论:使用机器人辅助臂的患者仅限于上肢功能严重受损的患者。用户体验强调了辅助机械臂在 ALS 中的广泛用途。积极的用户体验和较高的满意度突出表明,机械臂系统对于手臂运动功能严重缺失的 ALS 患者来说是一种有价值的治疗选择。
User expectations and experiences of an assistive robotic arm in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a multicenter observational study.
Objective: Robotic arms are innovative assistive devices for ALS patients with progressive motor deficits of arms and hands. The objective was to explore the patients´ expectations towards a robotic arm system and to assess the actual experiences after the provision of the device.
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at 9 ALS centers in Germany. ALS-related functional deficits were assessed using the ALS-Functional Rating Scale-revised (ALSFRS-R). Motor deficit of the upper limbs was determined using a subscore of three arm-related items of the ALSFRS-R (items 4-6; range 0-12 points). User expectations before provision (expectation group, n = 85) and user experiences after provision (experience group, n = 14) with the device (JACO Assistive Robotic Device, Kinova, Boisbriand, QC, Canada) were assessed.
Results: In the total cohort, mean ALSFRS-R subscore for arm function was 1.7 (SD: 2.0, 0-9) demonstrating a severe functional deficit of the upper limbs. In the expectation group (n = 85), the following use cases of the robotic arm have been prioritized: handling objects (89%), close-body movements (88%), pressing buttons (87%), serving drinks (86%), and opening cabinets and doors (85%). In the experience group (n = 14), handling objects (79%), serving drinks (79%), near-body movements (71%), pushing buttons (71%), serving food (64%), and opening doors (64%) were the most frequent used cases. Most patients used the device daily (71.4%, n = 10), and 28.6% (n = 4) several times a week. All patients of the experience group found the device helpful, felt safe while using the device, and were satisfied with its reliability. NPS of the assistive robotic arm revealed 64% "promoters" (strong recommendation), 29% "indifferents" (uncertain recommendation) and 7% "detractors" (no recommendation). Total NPS was + 57 demonstrating strong patient satisfaction.
Conclusions: Initiation of procurement with a robotic assistive arm was confined to patients with severe functional deficit of the upper limbs. User experience underlined the wide spectrum of use cases of assistive robotic arms in ALS. The positive user experience together with high satisfaction underscore that robotic arm systems serve as a valuable treatment option in ALS patients with severe motor deficits of the arms.