在环境中形成:对东方文化中医科学生心态的混合方法研究。

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Jiaxi Tan, Honghe Li, Pingmei Zhang, David A Hirsh
{"title":"在环境中形成:对东方文化中医科学生心态的混合方法研究。","authors":"Jiaxi Tan, Honghe Li, Pingmei Zhang, David A Hirsh","doi":"10.1111/medu.15491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mindsets have become an important focus in the fields of social and cognitive psychology. When holding a growth mindset, people appear more likely to engage in hard work and effort to foster success, seeing setbacks as necessary for learning. When holding a fixed mindset, in contrast, people tend to believe success comes from innate ability, seeing setbacks as evidence of inability. As such, mindsets affect students' learning, resilience and personal development. There is little empirical evidence, however, regarding how medical students perceive mindsets and the fundamental determinants of mindset formation, especially in non-Western contexts. This study investigated medical students' mindsets and perceptions of mindset formation with the aim of broadening the cross-cultural understanding of self-theories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a convergent mixed-methods approach at a medical school in China, the authors conducted a survey and four focus groups with medical students in first to third years. Quantitatively, we used the Dweck Mindset Scale to describe medical students' mindsets in the domains of intelligence and talent. Qualitatively, we analysed focus group data using a grounded theory approach to develop a descriptive model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey results included 464 responses for quantitative analysis. Multivariable regression found that Year 3 students had more fixed mindsets for intelligence and talent (p < 0.05) compared with Year 1 students. Rural students reported a more mixed mindset for intelligence compared to urban students (p < 0.05). Qualitative analysis of focus group data yielded four major categories: beliefs about mindsets, conceptualization of mindsets, achievement motivation and source of mindset formation. We developed a Mindset Basis Model to depict connections among the factors students perceived to influence mindset formation-intra- and interindividual factors; contextual factors; and micro-, meso- and macro-system factors-and students' motivation regarding achievement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study describes medical students' mindsets for the domains of intelligence and talent and explores how they conceptualised these mindsets. The findings indicate that factors influencing mindsets do not operate in isolation but through intricate interactions among multilevel factors embedded within a context.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formed in context: A mixed-methods study of medical students' mindsets in an Eastern culture.\",\"authors\":\"Jiaxi Tan, Honghe Li, Pingmei Zhang, David A Hirsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/medu.15491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mindsets have become an important focus in the fields of social and cognitive psychology. When holding a growth mindset, people appear more likely to engage in hard work and effort to foster success, seeing setbacks as necessary for learning. When holding a fixed mindset, in contrast, people tend to believe success comes from innate ability, seeing setbacks as evidence of inability. As such, mindsets affect students' learning, resilience and personal development. There is little empirical evidence, however, regarding how medical students perceive mindsets and the fundamental determinants of mindset formation, especially in non-Western contexts. This study investigated medical students' mindsets and perceptions of mindset formation with the aim of broadening the cross-cultural understanding of self-theories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a convergent mixed-methods approach at a medical school in China, the authors conducted a survey and four focus groups with medical students in first to third years. Quantitatively, we used the Dweck Mindset Scale to describe medical students' mindsets in the domains of intelligence and talent. Qualitatively, we analysed focus group data using a grounded theory approach to develop a descriptive model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey results included 464 responses for quantitative analysis. Multivariable regression found that Year 3 students had more fixed mindsets for intelligence and talent (p < 0.05) compared with Year 1 students. Rural students reported a more mixed mindset for intelligence compared to urban students (p < 0.05). Qualitative analysis of focus group data yielded four major categories: beliefs about mindsets, conceptualization of mindsets, achievement motivation and source of mindset formation. We developed a Mindset Basis Model to depict connections among the factors students perceived to influence mindset formation-intra- and interindividual factors; contextual factors; and micro-, meso- and macro-system factors-and students' motivation regarding achievement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study describes medical students' mindsets for the domains of intelligence and talent and explores how they conceptualised these mindsets. The findings indicate that factors influencing mindsets do not operate in isolation but through intricate interactions among multilevel factors embedded within a context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15491\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15491","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言心态已成为社会心理学和认知心理学领域的一个重要焦点。当持有成长型思维模式时,人们似乎更倾向于通过勤奋和努力来获得成功,并将挫折视为学习的必要条件。相反,当持有固定心态时,人们倾向于相信成功来自与生俱来的能力,将挫折视为无能的证据。因此,思维模式会影响学生的学习、应变能力和个人发展。然而,关于医学生如何看待思维定势以及思维定势形成的基本决定因素,尤其是在非西方背景下,却鲜有实证证据。本研究调查了医学生的心态和对心态形成的看法,旨在拓宽对自我理论的跨文化理解:方法:作者在中国一所医学院校采用了一种融合的混合方法,对一年级至三年级的医学生进行了一次调查和四次焦点小组讨论。在定量方面,我们使用德韦克心态量表来描述医学生在智力和才能方面的心态。在定性方面,我们使用基础理论方法对焦点小组数据进行了分析,以建立一个描述性模型:调查结果:我们对 464 份调查问卷进行了定量分析。多变量回归发现,三年级学生在智力和才能方面的思维定势更为固定(p 结论:该研究描述了医学生在智力和才能方面的思维定势:本研究描述了医科学生在智力和才能方面的思维定势,并探讨了他们如何将这些思维定势概念化。研究结果表明,影响思维定势的因素并不是孤立存在的,而是通过嵌入环境中的多层次因素之间错综复杂的相互作用而产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formed in context: A mixed-methods study of medical students' mindsets in an Eastern culture.

Introduction: Mindsets have become an important focus in the fields of social and cognitive psychology. When holding a growth mindset, people appear more likely to engage in hard work and effort to foster success, seeing setbacks as necessary for learning. When holding a fixed mindset, in contrast, people tend to believe success comes from innate ability, seeing setbacks as evidence of inability. As such, mindsets affect students' learning, resilience and personal development. There is little empirical evidence, however, regarding how medical students perceive mindsets and the fundamental determinants of mindset formation, especially in non-Western contexts. This study investigated medical students' mindsets and perceptions of mindset formation with the aim of broadening the cross-cultural understanding of self-theories.

Methods: Using a convergent mixed-methods approach at a medical school in China, the authors conducted a survey and four focus groups with medical students in first to third years. Quantitatively, we used the Dweck Mindset Scale to describe medical students' mindsets in the domains of intelligence and talent. Qualitatively, we analysed focus group data using a grounded theory approach to develop a descriptive model.

Results: Survey results included 464 responses for quantitative analysis. Multivariable regression found that Year 3 students had more fixed mindsets for intelligence and talent (p < 0.05) compared with Year 1 students. Rural students reported a more mixed mindset for intelligence compared to urban students (p < 0.05). Qualitative analysis of focus group data yielded four major categories: beliefs about mindsets, conceptualization of mindsets, achievement motivation and source of mindset formation. We developed a Mindset Basis Model to depict connections among the factors students perceived to influence mindset formation-intra- and interindividual factors; contextual factors; and micro-, meso- and macro-system factors-and students' motivation regarding achievement.

Conclusion: The study describes medical students' mindsets for the domains of intelligence and talent and explores how they conceptualised these mindsets. The findings indicate that factors influencing mindsets do not operate in isolation but through intricate interactions among multilevel factors embedded within a context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信