支架实时适应性的影响:支持职前数学教师的模拟评估技能

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Michael Nickl , Daniel Sommerhoff , Anika Radkowitsch , Sina A. Huber , Elisabeth Bauer , Stefan Ufer , Jan L. Plass , Tina Seidel
{"title":"支架实时适应性的影响:支持职前数学教师的模拟评估技能","authors":"Michael Nickl ,&nbsp;Daniel Sommerhoff ,&nbsp;Anika Radkowitsch ,&nbsp;Sina A. Huber ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Bauer ,&nbsp;Stefan Ufer ,&nbsp;Jan L. Plass ,&nbsp;Tina Seidel","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Scaffolding pre-service teachers' assessment process in video-based simulations can enhance their acquisition and refinement of assessment skills, for example, needed for accurate judgments of students' mathematical proof skills. Adapting this scaffolding to learners’ individual learning processes, for example, based on text data during the assessment process, brings potential for increased learning gains.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of adaptive scaffolding based on real-time process data, specifically targeting pre-service mathematics teachers' assessment skills regarding students’ mathematical proof skills in geometry.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>Participants were 245 pre-service teachers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a pre- and post-test, participants completed a video-based simulation to measure their assessment skills regarding students’ mathematical proof skills. During the intervention, participants were randomly assigned to complete the video-based simulation (i) without scaffolding, (ii) with non-adaptive scaffolding, or (iii) with adaptive scaffolding.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We did not find significant benefits of adaptive scaffolding in enhancing pre-service teachers’ judgment accuracy, aligning with prior research. For an in-depth analysis, we developed and applied a scheme to systematically validate design decisions for adaptive support. This scheme focuses on the selection and measurement of the source of adaptation and the employed support mechanisms. Applying this scheme pointed towards effects of adaptive scaffolding during the assessment process.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlights the need for proximal measures to describe learning in short interventions, explores the intricacies of adaptive scaffolding, such as overlapping with design-loop adaptivity or the accuracy of automated coding, and provides a scheme for an in-depth evaluation of the adaptivity of scaffolding.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 101994"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095947522400121X/pdfft?md5=40d09b163a1974882965d59fd9c5f975&pid=1-s2.0-S095947522400121X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of real-time adaptivity of scaffolding: Supporting pre-service mathematics teachers’ assessment skills in simulations\",\"authors\":\"Michael Nickl ,&nbsp;Daniel Sommerhoff ,&nbsp;Anika Radkowitsch ,&nbsp;Sina A. Huber ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Bauer ,&nbsp;Stefan Ufer ,&nbsp;Jan L. Plass ,&nbsp;Tina Seidel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Scaffolding pre-service teachers' assessment process in video-based simulations can enhance their acquisition and refinement of assessment skills, for example, needed for accurate judgments of students' mathematical proof skills. Adapting this scaffolding to learners’ individual learning processes, for example, based on text data during the assessment process, brings potential for increased learning gains.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of adaptive scaffolding based on real-time process data, specifically targeting pre-service mathematics teachers' assessment skills regarding students’ mathematical proof skills in geometry.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>Participants were 245 pre-service teachers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a pre- and post-test, participants completed a video-based simulation to measure their assessment skills regarding students’ mathematical proof skills. During the intervention, participants were randomly assigned to complete the video-based simulation (i) without scaffolding, (ii) with non-adaptive scaffolding, or (iii) with adaptive scaffolding.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We did not find significant benefits of adaptive scaffolding in enhancing pre-service teachers’ judgment accuracy, aligning with prior research. For an in-depth analysis, we developed and applied a scheme to systematically validate design decisions for adaptive support. This scheme focuses on the selection and measurement of the source of adaptation and the employed support mechanisms. Applying this scheme pointed towards effects of adaptive scaffolding during the assessment process.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlights the need for proximal measures to describe learning in short interventions, explores the intricacies of adaptive scaffolding, such as overlapping with design-loop adaptivity or the accuracy of automated coding, and provides a scheme for an in-depth evaluation of the adaptivity of scaffolding.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101994\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095947522400121X/pdfft?md5=40d09b163a1974882965d59fd9c5f975&pid=1-s2.0-S095947522400121X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095947522400121X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095947522400121X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在基于视频的模拟教学中,为职前教师的评估过程提供支架,可以提高他们掌握和完善评估技能的能力,例如,准确判断学生的数学证明技能。在本研究中,我们调查了基于实时过程数据的自适应支架的有效性,特别是针对职前数学教师在几何中对学生数学证明技能的评估技能。方法在前测和后测中,参与者完成了基于视频的模拟,以测量他们对学生数学证明技能的评估技能。在干预过程中,参与者被随机分配完成视频模拟:(i) 无支架;(ii) 非适应性支架;或 (iii) 适应性支架。结果我们没有发现适应性支架在提高职前教师判断准确性方面有显著优势,这与之前的研究结果一致。为了进行深入分析,我们开发并应用了一个方案来系统地验证自适应支持的设计决策。该方案重点关注适应性来源和所采用的支持机制的选择和测量。结论 本研究强调了对描述短期干预中学习情况的近端测量的需求,探索了自适应支架的复杂性,如与设计环适应性的重叠或自动编码的准确性,并为深入评估支架的适应性提供了一个方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of real-time adaptivity of scaffolding: Supporting pre-service mathematics teachers’ assessment skills in simulations

Background

Scaffolding pre-service teachers' assessment process in video-based simulations can enhance their acquisition and refinement of assessment skills, for example, needed for accurate judgments of students' mathematical proof skills. Adapting this scaffolding to learners’ individual learning processes, for example, based on text data during the assessment process, brings potential for increased learning gains.

Aims

In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of adaptive scaffolding based on real-time process data, specifically targeting pre-service mathematics teachers' assessment skills regarding students’ mathematical proof skills in geometry.

Sample

Participants were 245 pre-service teachers.

Methods

In a pre- and post-test, participants completed a video-based simulation to measure their assessment skills regarding students’ mathematical proof skills. During the intervention, participants were randomly assigned to complete the video-based simulation (i) without scaffolding, (ii) with non-adaptive scaffolding, or (iii) with adaptive scaffolding.

Results

We did not find significant benefits of adaptive scaffolding in enhancing pre-service teachers’ judgment accuracy, aligning with prior research. For an in-depth analysis, we developed and applied a scheme to systematically validate design decisions for adaptive support. This scheme focuses on the selection and measurement of the source of adaptation and the employed support mechanisms. Applying this scheme pointed towards effects of adaptive scaffolding during the assessment process.

Conclusions

This study highlights the need for proximal measures to describe learning in short interventions, explores the intricacies of adaptive scaffolding, such as overlapping with design-loop adaptivity or the accuracy of automated coding, and provides a scheme for an in-depth evaluation of the adaptivity of scaffolding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信