Ryan S. Pollard;David S. Hollinger;Iván E. Nail-Ulloa;Michael E. Zabala
{"title":"踝关节近未来关节角度估计的运动学方法","authors":"Ryan S. Pollard;David S. Hollinger;Iván E. Nail-Ulloa;Michael E. Zabala","doi":"10.1109/TMRB.2024.3408892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elevated runtimes of machine learning algorithms and neural networks make their inclusion in near-future joint angle estimation difficult. The purpose of this study was to develop simple, analytical models that prioritize historical joint kinematics when estimating near-future joint angles. Five kinematically-informed and extrapolation-based methods were developed for joint angle estimation at three near-future estimation horizons: \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} = 50$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms, 75 ms, and 100 ms. The estimation error and required runtimes of each prediction algorithm were evaluated on the sagittal-plane ankle angles of 24 individual subjects who performed three level-ground walking trials. Results showed that the kinematically-informed models had significantly faster estimation runtimes than Random Forest (RF) machine learning models trained and tested on identical datasets (kinematic models: \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{run}\\lt 0.62$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms, RF models: \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{run}\\gt 8.19$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms for all estimation horizons). The RF models exhibited significantly lower prediction errors than the kinematic models for estimation horizons of \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} = 75$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms and 100 ms, but no significance was found between the top-performing kinematic model and RF models for a \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} = 50$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms. These results indicate that a kinematically-informed approach to joint angle estimation can serve as a simple alternative to complex machine learning models for very near-future applications (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} \\leq 50$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms) while serving as a comparison baseline for more distant estimation horizons (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} \\geq 75$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n ms).","PeriodicalId":73318,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics","volume":"6 3","pages":"1125-1134"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Kinematically Informed Approach to Near-Future Joint Angle Estimation at the Ankle\",\"authors\":\"Ryan S. Pollard;David S. Hollinger;Iván E. Nail-Ulloa;Michael E. Zabala\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TMRB.2024.3408892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Elevated runtimes of machine learning algorithms and neural networks make their inclusion in near-future joint angle estimation difficult. The purpose of this study was to develop simple, analytical models that prioritize historical joint kinematics when estimating near-future joint angles. Five kinematically-informed and extrapolation-based methods were developed for joint angle estimation at three near-future estimation horizons: \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} = 50$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n ms, 75 ms, and 100 ms. The estimation error and required runtimes of each prediction algorithm were evaluated on the sagittal-plane ankle angles of 24 individual subjects who performed three level-ground walking trials. Results showed that the kinematically-informed models had significantly faster estimation runtimes than Random Forest (RF) machine learning models trained and tested on identical datasets (kinematic models: \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{run}\\\\lt 0.62$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n ms, RF models: \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{run}\\\\gt 8.19$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n ms for all estimation horizons). The RF models exhibited significantly lower prediction errors than the kinematic models for estimation horizons of \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} = 75$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n ms and 100 ms, but no significance was found between the top-performing kinematic model and RF models for a \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} = 50$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n ms. These results indicate that a kinematically-informed approach to joint angle estimation can serve as a simple alternative to complex machine learning models for very near-future applications (\\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} \\\\leq 50$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n ms) while serving as a comparison baseline for more distant estimation horizons (\\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$t_{pred} \\\\geq 75$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n ms).\",\"PeriodicalId\":73318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"1125-1134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10547217/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10547217/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
机器学习算法和神经网络的运行时间较长,因此很难将其纳入近未来关节角度估算中。本研究旨在开发简单的分析模型,在估算近未来关节角度时优先考虑历史关节运动学。研究开发了五种以运动学为基础的外推法,用于在三个近未来估计视角下估计关节角度:$t_{pred} = 50$ ms、75 ms 和 100 ms。对 24 名受试者进行了三次平地行走试验,评估了每种预测算法的估计误差和所需运行时间。结果表明,在相同的数据集上训练和测试的运动学模型的估计运行时间明显快于随机森林(RF)机器学习模型(运动学模型:$t_{run}\lt 0.62$ms,RF模型:$t_{run}\gt 8.19$ms,适用于所有估计范围)。射频模型在 $t_{pred} = 75$ ms 和 $t_{pred} = 100 ms 时的预测误差明显低于运动学模型,但在 $t_{pred} = 50$ ms 时,表现最好的运动学模型与射频模型之间没有显著差异。这些结果表明,在非常接近未来的应用中($t_{pred} \leq 50$ms),以运动学为基础的关节角度估计方法可以作为复杂机器学习模型的简单替代方法,同时也可以作为更远估计范围($t_{pred} \geq 75$ms)的比较基线。
A Kinematically Informed Approach to Near-Future Joint Angle Estimation at the Ankle
Elevated runtimes of machine learning algorithms and neural networks make their inclusion in near-future joint angle estimation difficult. The purpose of this study was to develop simple, analytical models that prioritize historical joint kinematics when estimating near-future joint angles. Five kinematically-informed and extrapolation-based methods were developed for joint angle estimation at three near-future estimation horizons:
$t_{pred} = 50$
ms, 75 ms, and 100 ms. The estimation error and required runtimes of each prediction algorithm were evaluated on the sagittal-plane ankle angles of 24 individual subjects who performed three level-ground walking trials. Results showed that the kinematically-informed models had significantly faster estimation runtimes than Random Forest (RF) machine learning models trained and tested on identical datasets (kinematic models:
$t_{run}\lt 0.62$
ms, RF models:
$t_{run}\gt 8.19$
ms for all estimation horizons). The RF models exhibited significantly lower prediction errors than the kinematic models for estimation horizons of
$t_{pred} = 75$
ms and 100 ms, but no significance was found between the top-performing kinematic model and RF models for a
$t_{pred} = 50$
ms. These results indicate that a kinematically-informed approach to joint angle estimation can serve as a simple alternative to complex machine learning models for very near-future applications (
$t_{pred} \leq 50$
ms) while serving as a comparison baseline for more distant estimation horizons (
$t_{pred} \geq 75$
ms).