解剖病理流程自动化技术:综述

IF 3.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Sabrina Ciancia;Lorenzo Vannozzi;Aliria Poliziani;Lorena Guachi-Guachi;Denise Amram;Dario Lunni;Alessandra Zucca;Marco Bellini;Luigi Spagnoli;Gian Andrea Pedrazzini;Andrea Cavazzana;Leonardo Ricotti
{"title":"解剖病理流程自动化技术:综述","authors":"Sabrina Ciancia;Lorenzo Vannozzi;Aliria Poliziani;Lorena Guachi-Guachi;Denise Amram;Dario Lunni;Alessandra Zucca;Marco Bellini;Luigi Spagnoli;Gian Andrea Pedrazzini;Andrea Cavazzana;Leonardo Ricotti","doi":"10.1109/TMRB.2024.3421611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the primary roles of an anatomic pathology laboratory (APL) is the identification of tissue abnormalities, which is crucial for diagnosing diseases and defining a suitable therapy. To date, a considerable number of human errors and artifacts affect the APL test cycle in all its phases (pre-analytical, intra-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical), mainly due to manual and non-standardized procedures. An extensive use of technologies (among which robotic ones) aimed at favoring laboratory automation procedures, would be key in decreasing these errors and their clinical consequences. However, several improvements in workflow, technology and standardization still need to occur. In this review, we discuss the current level of automation currently available in the APL histopathologic production workflow in all phases of the test cycle, highlighting the legal and ethical issues related to their adoption.","PeriodicalId":73318,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technologies for the Automation of Anatomic Pathology Processes: A Review\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Ciancia;Lorenzo Vannozzi;Aliria Poliziani;Lorena Guachi-Guachi;Denise Amram;Dario Lunni;Alessandra Zucca;Marco Bellini;Luigi Spagnoli;Gian Andrea Pedrazzini;Andrea Cavazzana;Leonardo Ricotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TMRB.2024.3421611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the primary roles of an anatomic pathology laboratory (APL) is the identification of tissue abnormalities, which is crucial for diagnosing diseases and defining a suitable therapy. To date, a considerable number of human errors and artifacts affect the APL test cycle in all its phases (pre-analytical, intra-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical), mainly due to manual and non-standardized procedures. An extensive use of technologies (among which robotic ones) aimed at favoring laboratory automation procedures, would be key in decreasing these errors and their clinical consequences. However, several improvements in workflow, technology and standardization still need to occur. In this review, we discuss the current level of automation currently available in the APL histopathologic production workflow in all phases of the test cycle, highlighting the legal and ethical issues related to their adoption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10579837/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10579837/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

解剖病理实验室(APL)的主要职责之一是鉴定组织异常,这对诊断疾病和确定合适的治疗方法至关重要。迄今为止,在解剖病理实验室检验周期的各个阶段(分析前、分析中、分析和分析后)都存在着相当多的人为错误和人为因素,这主要是由于人工操作和非标准化程序造成的。广泛使用旨在促进实验室自动化程序的技术(其中包括机器人技术),将是减少这些错误及其临床后果的关键。然而,在工作流程、技术和标准化方面仍有许多需要改进的地方。在这篇综述中,我们将讨论目前在 APL 组织病理学生产工作流程中检验周期各阶段的自动化水平,并强调与采用这些技术相关的法律和伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technologies for the Automation of Anatomic Pathology Processes: A Review
One of the primary roles of an anatomic pathology laboratory (APL) is the identification of tissue abnormalities, which is crucial for diagnosing diseases and defining a suitable therapy. To date, a considerable number of human errors and artifacts affect the APL test cycle in all its phases (pre-analytical, intra-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical), mainly due to manual and non-standardized procedures. An extensive use of technologies (among which robotic ones) aimed at favoring laboratory automation procedures, would be key in decreasing these errors and their clinical consequences. However, several improvements in workflow, technology and standardization still need to occur. In this review, we discuss the current level of automation currently available in the APL histopathologic production workflow in all phases of the test cycle, highlighting the legal and ethical issues related to their adoption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信