{"title":"在工程数学中使用评分标准的设计原则","authors":"Anita L. Campbell;Pragashni Padayachee","doi":"10.1109/TE.2023.3329761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contribution: This concept article shows how the mathematical competencies research framework (MCRF) can guide the design of rubrics to assess engineering mathematics tasks. Practical guidance is given for engineering mathematics educators wanting to create effective rubrics that support student learning and promote academic success. Background: The authors argue that including some rubric-assessed tasks can help students cope better with mathematically challenging concepts. By making explicit the mathematical competencies needed, students may make better use of mathematics concepts outside of mathematics classes. Research Question: What are the design principles for using rubrics to develop mathematical competencies in a way that enables engineering students to voice their values? Methodology: Literature on rubric design was combined with the MCRF and engineering graduate attributes to design rubric principles for tasks involving mathematics competencies. Findings: A general rubric is presented, aligned to six mathematical competencies, with an example of a task and rubric for analyzing ac circuits with complex impedance on GeoGebra. By giving room for students to voice what they value, the rubric design helps to address the challenge of inclusion.","PeriodicalId":55011,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Education","volume":"67 4","pages":"499-507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design Principles for Using Rubrics in Engineering Mathematics\",\"authors\":\"Anita L. Campbell;Pragashni Padayachee\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TE.2023.3329761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contribution: This concept article shows how the mathematical competencies research framework (MCRF) can guide the design of rubrics to assess engineering mathematics tasks. Practical guidance is given for engineering mathematics educators wanting to create effective rubrics that support student learning and promote academic success. Background: The authors argue that including some rubric-assessed tasks can help students cope better with mathematically challenging concepts. By making explicit the mathematical competencies needed, students may make better use of mathematics concepts outside of mathematics classes. Research Question: What are the design principles for using rubrics to develop mathematical competencies in a way that enables engineering students to voice their values? Methodology: Literature on rubric design was combined with the MCRF and engineering graduate attributes to design rubric principles for tasks involving mathematics competencies. Findings: A general rubric is presented, aligned to six mathematical competencies, with an example of a task and rubric for analyzing ac circuits with complex impedance on GeoGebra. By giving room for students to voice what they value, the rubric design helps to address the challenge of inclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Education\",\"volume\":\"67 4\",\"pages\":\"499-507\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10339269/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10339269/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Design Principles for Using Rubrics in Engineering Mathematics
Contribution: This concept article shows how the mathematical competencies research framework (MCRF) can guide the design of rubrics to assess engineering mathematics tasks. Practical guidance is given for engineering mathematics educators wanting to create effective rubrics that support student learning and promote academic success. Background: The authors argue that including some rubric-assessed tasks can help students cope better with mathematically challenging concepts. By making explicit the mathematical competencies needed, students may make better use of mathematics concepts outside of mathematics classes. Research Question: What are the design principles for using rubrics to develop mathematical competencies in a way that enables engineering students to voice their values? Methodology: Literature on rubric design was combined with the MCRF and engineering graduate attributes to design rubric principles for tasks involving mathematics competencies. Findings: A general rubric is presented, aligned to six mathematical competencies, with an example of a task and rubric for analyzing ac circuits with complex impedance on GeoGebra. By giving room for students to voice what they value, the rubric design helps to address the challenge of inclusion.
期刊介绍:
The IEEE Transactions on Education (ToE) publishes significant and original scholarly contributions to education in electrical and electronics engineering, computer engineering, computer science, and other fields within the scope of interest of IEEE. Contributions must address discovery, integration, and/or application of knowledge in education in these fields. Articles must support contributions and assertions with compelling evidence and provide explicit, transparent descriptions of the processes through which the evidence is collected, analyzed, and interpreted. While characteristics of compelling evidence cannot be described to address every conceivable situation, generally assessment of the work being reported must go beyond student self-report and attitudinal data.