荷兰公众对肉类税收属性的偏好:离散选择实验

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Veerle E. Siegerink , Joyce Delnoij , Francisco Alpizar
{"title":"荷兰公众对肉类税收属性的偏好:离散选择实验","authors":"Veerle E. Siegerink ,&nbsp;Joyce Delnoij ,&nbsp;Francisco Alpizar","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To stay within global environmental boundaries, the food system requires significant changes. In this context, a tax on meat products is frequently proposed as a policy measure to stimulate a dietary shift away from meat products. Understanding public preferences for the design of such a tax may serve as a starting point for increasing its political feasibility. Our paper explores public preferences for meat tax attributes among inhabitants of the Netherlands, the most livestock-intensive country in Europe. Using a discrete choice experiment, we estimate relative preferences for the following tax design attributes: (i) use of tax revenues; (ii) products under taxation; and (iii) joint efforts by other countries. Our results indicate that Dutch people significantly prefer a meat tax that exempts poultry or organic products, is implemented in a joint effort with several other EU countries, and earmarks revenues for specific purposes, with the preference for using revenues to reduce the value-added tax on fruits and vegetables being the strongest. We find significant heterogeneity in these preferences, which we explore using a latent class logit model. While the classes do not exhibit highly distinct socio-economic profiles, they are characterized by a combination of factors such as gender, income levels, and education. Our results may inform ongoing discussions about meat taxation in the Netherlands and contribute to further research on meat tax preferences in other countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 102675"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224000861/pdfft?md5=383b0390cd6de3eef9746169fb13b7b6&pid=1-s2.0-S0306919224000861-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public preferences for meat tax attributes in The Netherlands: A discrete choice experiment\",\"authors\":\"Veerle E. Siegerink ,&nbsp;Joyce Delnoij ,&nbsp;Francisco Alpizar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To stay within global environmental boundaries, the food system requires significant changes. In this context, a tax on meat products is frequently proposed as a policy measure to stimulate a dietary shift away from meat products. Understanding public preferences for the design of such a tax may serve as a starting point for increasing its political feasibility. Our paper explores public preferences for meat tax attributes among inhabitants of the Netherlands, the most livestock-intensive country in Europe. Using a discrete choice experiment, we estimate relative preferences for the following tax design attributes: (i) use of tax revenues; (ii) products under taxation; and (iii) joint efforts by other countries. Our results indicate that Dutch people significantly prefer a meat tax that exempts poultry or organic products, is implemented in a joint effort with several other EU countries, and earmarks revenues for specific purposes, with the preference for using revenues to reduce the value-added tax on fruits and vegetables being the strongest. We find significant heterogeneity in these preferences, which we explore using a latent class logit model. While the classes do not exhibit highly distinct socio-economic profiles, they are characterized by a combination of factors such as gender, income levels, and education. Our results may inform ongoing discussions about meat taxation in the Netherlands and contribute to further research on meat tax preferences in other countries.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Policy\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102675\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224000861/pdfft?md5=383b0390cd6de3eef9746169fb13b7b6&pid=1-s2.0-S0306919224000861-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224000861\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224000861","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要想保持在全球环境界限之内,粮食系统就必须进行重大变革。在这种情况下,人们经常提议对肉类产品征税,以此作为刺激人们在饮食上远离肉类产品的政策措施。了解公众对此类税收设计的偏好可能是提高其政治可行性的一个起点。荷兰是欧洲牲畜最密集的国家,我们的论文探讨了荷兰居民对肉类税收属性的公众偏好。通过离散选择实验,我们估算了以下税收设计属性的相对偏好:(i) 税收收入的使用;(ii) 征税产品;(iii) 与其他国家的共同努力。我们的结果表明,荷兰人更倾向于免征家禽或有机产品的肉类税、与其他几个欧盟国家联合实施的肉类税,以及将税收指定用于特定用途的肉类税,而将税收用于降低水果和蔬菜增值税的倾向性最强。我们发现这些偏好具有显著的异质性,并利用潜类 logit 模型对此进行了探讨。虽然这些类别并没有表现出高度不同的社会经济特征,但它们是由性别、收入水平和教育程度等因素组合而成的。我们的研究结果可以为荷兰正在进行的肉类税收讨论提供参考,并有助于进一步研究其他国家的肉类税收偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public preferences for meat tax attributes in The Netherlands: A discrete choice experiment

To stay within global environmental boundaries, the food system requires significant changes. In this context, a tax on meat products is frequently proposed as a policy measure to stimulate a dietary shift away from meat products. Understanding public preferences for the design of such a tax may serve as a starting point for increasing its political feasibility. Our paper explores public preferences for meat tax attributes among inhabitants of the Netherlands, the most livestock-intensive country in Europe. Using a discrete choice experiment, we estimate relative preferences for the following tax design attributes: (i) use of tax revenues; (ii) products under taxation; and (iii) joint efforts by other countries. Our results indicate that Dutch people significantly prefer a meat tax that exempts poultry or organic products, is implemented in a joint effort with several other EU countries, and earmarks revenues for specific purposes, with the preference for using revenues to reduce the value-added tax on fruits and vegetables being the strongest. We find significant heterogeneity in these preferences, which we explore using a latent class logit model. While the classes do not exhibit highly distinct socio-economic profiles, they are characterized by a combination of factors such as gender, income levels, and education. Our results may inform ongoing discussions about meat taxation in the Netherlands and contribute to further research on meat tax preferences in other countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信