因果关系归因在人内和人际间对感知到不礼貌行为后改善人际关系的影响

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Jack Carson, Jeremy Mackey, Katherine Alexander, Charn McAllister, Michael Phillipich
{"title":"因果关系归因在人内和人际间对感知到不礼貌行为后改善人际关系的影响","authors":"Jack Carson,&nbsp;Jeremy Mackey,&nbsp;Katherine Alexander,&nbsp;Charn McAllister,&nbsp;Michael Phillipich","doi":"10.1111/joop.12537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Workplace incivility research has grown considerably over recent decades. However, this stream of research still has not adequately explained targets' attributions for experienced incivility or their potential positive responses to incivility. The present study longitudinally investigates the relationship between attributions for workplace incivility and relationship improvement responses with data from 1871 person-month observations. In contrast to expectations, we found targets' beliefs that their relationship with the uncivil coworker was the cause of the incivility (i.e., relational locus of causality) were negatively related to relationship improvement behaviours. The results also indicated that this negative relationship was attenuated by belief that the target had control over the cause of incivility (i.e., internal controllability) and task interdependence at the between-person level, and by belief that the uncivil coworker had control over the cause of incivility (i.e., external controllability) at the within-person level. Direct effects analysis indicated that internal and external controllability attributions for incivility had significant positive between-person effects on relationship improvement efforts. Frequency of interaction and task interdependence were both significant positive predictors of relationship improvement efforts at both the between- and within-person levels. Implications for research and future directions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"97 4","pages":"1736-1761"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.12537","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Within- and between-person effects of causal attributions on relationship improvement following perceived incivility\",\"authors\":\"Jack Carson,&nbsp;Jeremy Mackey,&nbsp;Katherine Alexander,&nbsp;Charn McAllister,&nbsp;Michael Phillipich\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joop.12537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Workplace incivility research has grown considerably over recent decades. However, this stream of research still has not adequately explained targets' attributions for experienced incivility or their potential positive responses to incivility. The present study longitudinally investigates the relationship between attributions for workplace incivility and relationship improvement responses with data from 1871 person-month observations. In contrast to expectations, we found targets' beliefs that their relationship with the uncivil coworker was the cause of the incivility (i.e., relational locus of causality) were negatively related to relationship improvement behaviours. The results also indicated that this negative relationship was attenuated by belief that the target had control over the cause of incivility (i.e., internal controllability) and task interdependence at the between-person level, and by belief that the uncivil coworker had control over the cause of incivility (i.e., external controllability) at the within-person level. Direct effects analysis indicated that internal and external controllability attributions for incivility had significant positive between-person effects on relationship improvement efforts. Frequency of interaction and task interdependence were both significant positive predictors of relationship improvement efforts at both the between- and within-person levels. Implications for research and future directions are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology\",\"volume\":\"97 4\",\"pages\":\"1736-1761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.12537\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12537\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12537","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,对工作场所不礼貌行为的研究有了长足的发展。然而,这些研究仍未充分解释目标对所经历的不礼貌行为的归因或他们对不礼貌行为的潜在积极反应。本研究利用 1871 人月的观察数据,纵向调查了工作场所不礼貌行为的归因与关系改善反应之间的关系。与预期不同的是,我们发现目标人物认为他们与不文明同事的关系是不文明行为的原因(即因果关系定位)与关系改善行为呈负相关。研究结果还表明,在人与人之间的层面上,这种负相关关系因认为目标对不文明行为的起因有控制权(即内部可控性)和任务相互依赖性而减弱;在人与人之间的层面上,这种负相关关系因认为不文明同事对不文明行为的起因有控制权(即外部可控性)而减弱。直接效应分析表明,不文明行为的内部和外部可控性归因对人际关系改善努力具有显著的正向影响。在人与人之间和人与人之间的层面上,互动频率和任务相互依赖性对改善关系的努力都有显著的正向预测作用。本文讨论了研究意义和未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Within- and between-person effects of causal attributions on relationship improvement following perceived incivility

Within- and between-person effects of causal attributions on relationship improvement following perceived incivility

Workplace incivility research has grown considerably over recent decades. However, this stream of research still has not adequately explained targets' attributions for experienced incivility or their potential positive responses to incivility. The present study longitudinally investigates the relationship between attributions for workplace incivility and relationship improvement responses with data from 1871 person-month observations. In contrast to expectations, we found targets' beliefs that their relationship with the uncivil coworker was the cause of the incivility (i.e., relational locus of causality) were negatively related to relationship improvement behaviours. The results also indicated that this negative relationship was attenuated by belief that the target had control over the cause of incivility (i.e., internal controllability) and task interdependence at the between-person level, and by belief that the uncivil coworker had control over the cause of incivility (i.e., external controllability) at the within-person level. Direct effects analysis indicated that internal and external controllability attributions for incivility had significant positive between-person effects on relationship improvement efforts. Frequency of interaction and task interdependence were both significant positive predictors of relationship improvement efforts at both the between- and within-person levels. Implications for research and future directions are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信